Can they not test for immunity and infectiousness?They could have had a cold then and be infectious with SARS-CoV-2 now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can they not test for immunity and infectiousness?They could have had a cold then and be infectious with SARS-CoV-2 now.
An antibody test won't show if someone is infectious. With what we know right now, a PCR test doesn't even do that well. A PCR test shows if the virus is present. We assume an infectious period for so many days after a positive test.Can they not test for immunity and infectiousness?
They need to test regardless...to separate the common cold cases from the covid cases, figure out who’s had it but didn’t know it and is not infectious anymore, and those more likely to be asymptomatic carriers.
But not for months on end. The damage is going to be massive and ongoing. Just think of the landfills alone right now. The kids not playing with other kids, not getting hugs, not learning to share. The fear and paranoia about human contact. The economic fallout, the domestic violence, the suicide...etc. That’s not caring. So that’s why I am saying don’t just swallow whole everything the experts say. Experts can exploit situations, too. It’s not like experts have never exploited a crisis for political and authoritarian purposes before...or manipulated stats for a certain angle.
For war. To keep the people nice and oppressed and heads down. This will cause the "greatest depression". Do you remember what happened after the last one? Oh, and people will be good and used to authoritarianism and believing whatever they're fed. And Trump and the U.K. are already using war powers to compel manufacturers to make what they want - they did that in WW2 with not just weapons, but vehicles, early "computers" (punch card machines IBM made for the Nazis) medical supplies and so on. And there's already economic, supply chain, and cyber wars going on. Sure call me stupid and paranoid because I don't think lab techs and doctors of epidemiology have the whole picture.Things are bad enough without catastrophizing. It won't last for months and months.
I'm still waiting for an answer about how the authorities will use this. What exactly is the hidden purpose of using these draconian measures?
Right, but we're also underestimating how many have it, particularly in low risk populations. Number of deaths is still pretty similar.![]()
Why we're overestimating the mortality rate for COVID-19
A lack of adequate testing for COVID-19 means only a proportion of cases are being counted in official statistics - making it seem deadlier than it is.www.weforum.org
But in low risk populations it's just a bad cold. It's the death rate that's the most important number - the death rate and the icu rate.Right, but we're also underestimating how many have it, particularly in low risk populations. Number of deaths is still pretty similar.
Draconian is an adjective meaning great severity, that derives from Draco, an Athenian law scribe under whom small offenses had heavy punishments (Draconian laws).What exactly is the hidden purpose of using these draconian measures?
But sorry I guess @ChemGal knows more than the person who wrote that article I posted.
After a point, they are. Does anyone have in mind what that point is or are you prepared to just believe whatever you are told and live this way in the long term?I know what draconian means @Ritafee. My purpose in using that word was to respond to you and Kimmio who seem to think these measures are an overreaction.
I do indeed think these measures are an over reaction. But then I have always been opposed to Draconian measures for any reason.My purpose in using that word was to respond to you and Kimmio who seem to think these measures are an overreaction.
After a point, they are. Does anyone have in mind what that point is or are you prepared to just believe whatever you are told and live this way in the long term?
I wouldn't. You don't know much about world affairs.I would say moreso than the person making conclusions from it here.