Netflix & Streaming Services

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Netflix is changing the broadcasting game in favour of the consumer. The real luxury now is having cable. That costs at least 5 times more than Netflix, assuming you already have an Internet connection. In Toronto, an increasingly popular option is an indoor antenna and a Netflix account.
 
I assume that you do not have cable, either, Jae? I have Netflix because I refuse to pay the ransom to Rogers that they demand so that I can watch Jeopardy twice or thrice a week.
Cable is expensive. You're right about that one Bette. I don't have it either. In the good old days one could access television programming using rabbit ears.
 
Cable is expensive. You're right about that one Bette. I don't have it either. In the good old days one could access television programming using rabbit ears.

You still can. It's just that it's digital rabbit ears now :D.

http://freetoronto.tv/

Personally, I'll take Netflix over cable if push comes to shove but if you aren't even paying for cable, then NF is equally optional, though it is only 7.99 on top of your Internet connection (but you do need decent high-speed like cable or Fibe to really use it properly).
 
You still can. It's just that it's digital rabbit ears now :D.

http://freetoronto.tv/

Personally, I'll take Netflix over cable if push comes to shove but if you aren't even paying for cable, then NF is equally optional, though it is only 7.99 on top of your Internet connection (but you do need decent high-speed like cable or Fibe to really use it properly).
Thank you Mendalla. I will certainly give that some prayer filled thought.
 
FYI, Jae, my wife's cousin in Richmond Hill gets all his TV via an antenna (for network programming that is broadcast in the TO area, including most US networks out of Buffalo) or streaming and downloading (for cable or other non-broadcast fare). He has never had cable in his current house (though he may have NF, I forget).
 
FYI, Jae, my wife's cousin in Richmond Hill gets all his TV via an antenna (for network programming that is broadcast in the TO area, including most US networks out of Buffalo) or streaming and downloading (for cable or other non-broadcast fare). He has never had cable in his current house (though he may have NF, I forget).
When the possibility of free TV return to Toronto? Any idea? I recall when Rogers was broadcasting that at such and such a date everyone would have to switch over to cable.
 
Rogers was marketing. Everyone had to switch to digital, and both Rogers and Bell's offerings are digital, but fee, over-the-air signals never went away. They did however, start broadcasting a digital signal in place of their analog signal (and in some areas, analog remained after that for CBC). If you were using an old antenna or rabbit ears, you had to get a digital setup box for your TV to get those new signals, that's all. New ones come with the digital receiver.
 
I've been watching another Netflix series - Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt.


Just started it last week. Three episodes in. I'm rather enjoying it.

It was apparently commissioned by NBC, but too "edgy" for them. One more example why networks are becoming irrelevant - they have to worry about offending viewers. Netflix doesn't, and it leads to better programming that actually takes chances and is more relevant.


For example, read the headline below the reporter at 0:24 in the trailer. You have to pause it quick:

Once again, let people be offended.
 
I had to change my rating for the show. I guess after the first episode I gave it 3 stars. I really enjoy the scenes away from the apartment much more. I've also been watching most of the episodes twice, once alone, and then with Chemguy. I always catch something new!
 
John Doyle in the Globe did a list of "7 series you should watch on Netflix" (and deliberately avoided the two five hundred pound gorilla of NF Originals, namely House of Cards and Orange is the New Black) and Kimmy Schmidt was high on the list. Not all are Netflix originals. Most are network or cable shows that are getting a second life on NF.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts...hould-be-watching-on-netflix/article23337490/
 
One of the most bizarre TV shows I've come across in ... well ... ever is Danger 5. It has a 1960s action show vibe but is supposed to be about a squad of Allied agents fighting weird Nazi plots and trying to KILL HITLER!!! And their boss has a bird head (a bald eagle, I think) and wears what appears to be Patrick McGoohan's outfit from The Prisoner.

The plots are completely off the wall (Nazis stealing major monuments to build a statue of Hitler, Nazi lizardmen based in the Antarctic attacking Europe with mind-controlled dinosaurs), the characters are outrageous, and the fx deliberately made to look like a low-budget series from the sixties but somehow it still manages to entertain ... barely. I'm 3 episodes in and it starting to get tiresome and formulaic. Then again, the shows it's parodying are tiresome and formulaic so...

Fun to watch once or twice but I'm not sure I'll get through season 1, let alone season 2 (which is set in the eighties and involves time travel).
 
One of the most bizarre TV shows I've come across in ... well ... ever is Danger 5. It has a 1960s action show vibe but is supposed to be about a squad of Allied agents fighting weird Nazi plots and trying to KILL HITLER!!! And their boss has a bird head (a bald eagle, I think) and wears what appears to be Patrick McGoohan's outfit from The Prisoner.

The plots are completely off the wall (Nazis stealing major monuments to build a statue of Hitler, Nazi lizardmen based in the Antarctic attacking Europe with mind-controlled dinosaurs), the characters are outrageous, and the fx deliberately made to look like a low-budget series from the sixties but somehow it still manages to entertain ... barely. I'm 3 episodes in and it starting to get tiresome and formulaic. Then again, the shows it's parodying are tiresome and formulaic so...

Fun to watch once or twice but I'm not sure I'll get through season 1, let alone season 2 (which is set in the eighties and involves time travel).

PS. One caution about Danger 5: if you find heavy drinking and smoking, blatant drug use, and sexual innuendo that includes suggestions of BDSM offensive, then you probably want to watch something else.
 
just asked YOungestSon about it. He said he had heard it was funny but odd. sounds about the same as you posted.
 
Anyone else given Grace and Frankie a whirl? I'm into episode 3 and liking it so far. Stellar main cast of Jane Fonda, Lily Tomlin, Martin Sheen, and Sam Waterston. Basically two couples are thrown into chaos when the husbands, who are partners in a law firm, announce that they have been having a gay relationship for 20 years and are leaving their wives to marry each other. That forces the mis-matched wives (Grace, played by Fonda, and Frankie, played by Tomlin) into a sort of, kind of friendship. Their adult children get sucked along for the ride, providing a fairly good supporting cast (admittedly, the only one of them I have any knowledge of is former model Brooklyn Decker).

The nice thing is that there are no villains or heroes here. While the men initially come off as rather selfish for how they've handled things, their relationship is nicely portrayed and quite romantic while the women, who initially come off as stereotypes and rather self-centred themselves (Grace as a stressed out, high-living retired businesswoman, Frankie as a rather flaky, New Age-y flower child artist), warm up and develop as characters as they cope with the situation.
 
i was thinking of watching it, then watched "witness" which is all english subtitles...but, an interesting crime drama/
 
I'm really liking Frankie and Grace. I was up to episode 8, when my guy agreed to give it a whirl, so I'm back a bit, but he's liking it too. I like all the actors, and it is really quite a gentle thing. (I started Witness, but then quickly remembered how tired I get of subtitles; I don't know that dubbing is much worse.)
 
I'm really liking Frankie and Grace. I was up to episode 8, when my guy agreed to give it a whirl, so I'm back a bit, but he's liking it too. I like all the actors, and it is really quite a gentle thing. (I started Witness, but then quickly remembered how tired I get of subtitles; I don't know that dubbing is much worse.)

I just watched "The Earthquake" (episode 6 of Grace and Frankie) last night. I find it's getting funnier as time goes on and I've really enjoyed Tomlin's performances in the last couple episodes (Fonda, too). I do find the men (Sheen and Waterston) have taken a bit longer to settle into their roles, but Sam was great in "The Earthquake".
 
Back
Top