Meanwhile in Canada

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

at best and gives them a bare majority that could easily fall apart given it is predicated on Conservative MPs magically becoming Liberals. Which they are not. This is likely dissatisfaction with Poilievre combined with some kind of personal agenda, not a total change of political heart.
I'm opposed to MPs crossing the floor directly to the governing party because:
  • It betrays voters who elected them under one banner.
  • It rewards opportunism with instant power and perks.
  • It lets governments gain majorities without elections.
I think it would be better if switchers sat as independents with no immediate caucus jump.

Independence for conviction is consistency; crossing for power advantage is not.
 
Hasn't Canada only had one Federal Coalition Government and that one was in 1917 during WW1?
Who's going to cross the floor right now, and be forever known as the one who gave the Liberals the majority?
 
Otherwise known as an election. It's going to be hard to force an early one but there will be one eventually.


This Liberal strategy of poaching Conservatives is going to bite them on the ass eventually, would be my guess. It's a stopgap to get them through to the next election at best and gives them a bare majority that could easily fall apart given it is predicated on Conservative MPs magically becoming Liberals. Which they are not. This is likely dissatisfaction with Poilievre combined with some kind of personal agenda, not a total change of political heart. And even if they are "Liberals" now, when we get to that next election, there's a good chance their ridings could go back to the Conservatives. After all, the electors in those ridings didn't vote Liberal.

There is a rumor that in many places ... authority is attempting tyrannically to oppose the populaces desires for balance! Power is a toxic potion!
 
Not likely here. We have riots and large scale protests from time to time but haven't really had a full-blown uprising since Riel, I don't think. And I haven't seen much evidence that people are pissed off enough at the Liberals to even protest noisily.

The entire thing will be laid to rest ... mostly as a dead society without any care whatsoever! Wipe-out ... like a song ... sad but true humans are desperate enemies against themselves and everything ... how to get beyond one'self ? Das ole ... a very dark absorptive item ...
 
Recall that humanity is the only species that supports insanity and irrational activity against its own collective ... a conjugation?

It may create a very large word as God ... these can extent into the up-there! By change a large black hole ...
 
  • Alberta's Bill 14, the Justice Statutes Amendment Act, received royal assent on December 12, 2025, removing prior restrictions on citizen-initiated referendums that conflicted with the Constitution, thus allowing sovereignty questions to proceed.
  • The Alberta Prosperity Project, a non-profit advocating for provincial independence, resubmitted its referendum question—"Do you agree that the Province of Alberta should cease to be part of Canada to become an independent state?"—with signature collection starting late January 2026 to trigger a vote.
 
My prediction is that an "independent" Alberta likely ends up as part of the USA within a generation or less, maybe as little as a decade. Or comes crawling back to Canada, but that's less likely IMHO. They would be even more resource dependent than they are now making them a desirable and likely easy takeover target for Washington. And my sense of the Alberta independence movement is that joining the US would really not be seen as a bad outcome for them.

Quebec, OTOH, would not fare well in the USA. Their nationalist aspirations, socialist leaning, and attempts to become a French-speaking secular state wouldn't fly with a lot of the US, including/especially MAGA. So likely they become independent, stay independent, and lean strongly towards Europe rather than the USA.

I'm opposed to MPs crossing the floor directly to the governing party because:
  • It betrays voters who elected them under one banner.
  • It rewards opportunism with instant power and perks.
  • It lets governments gain majorities without elections.
I think it would be better if switchers sat as independents with no immediate caucus jump.
Oh, I agree very much. That's why I suggested this "jump" likely won't last past the next election when their ridings probably go back to the Conservatives. Not sure much can be done though under current circumstances. My suggestion would be legislating that an MP switching parties triggers a recall vote except we don't have those federally yet.
 
I think we'll see a minority Conservative government next cycle, assuming that the party can get their s**t together and find an electable leader.
They're too full of right wing nut jobs. The Liberals shifted right to fill the gap left by the shrinking moderate Conservative wing.
 
My prediction is that an "independent" Alberta likely ends up as part of the USA within a generation or less, maybe as little as a decade. Or comes crawling back to Canada, but that's less likely IMHO. They would be even more resource dependent than they are now making them a desirable and likely easy takeover target for Washington. And my sense of the Alberta independence movement is that joining the US would really not be seen as a bad outcome for them.

Quebec, OTOH, would not fare well in the USA. Their nationalist aspirations, socialist leaning, and attempts to become a French-speaking secular state wouldn't fly with a lot of the US, including/especially MAGA. So likely they become independent, stay independent, and lean strongly towards Europe rather than the USA.


Oh, I agree very much. That's why I suggested this "jump" likely won't last past the next election when their ridings probably go back to the Conservatives. Not sure much can be done though under current circumstances. My suggestion would be legislating that an MP switching parties triggers a recall vote except we don't have those federally yet.

I tall points to more miasma ... i.e. extended chaos in the reasoning that rationality is boring ... thus departure from ordinary!
 
They're too full of right wing nut jobs. The Liberals shifted right to fill the gap left by the shrinking moderate Conservative wing.
Even still that just gives the right more momentum than it moves it to the centre. Because of the global rightward shift, what we needed is the things moving more left. Instead the NDP and Greens became more irrelevant, and they also have taken more neoliberal stances - which is a rightward shift from where they were.

I have no political party home right now. I voted Green, though.
 
In the midst of right and the remnant ... a medium that devoid because of what the other duo extracted for echo nominal process ...

Thus the idealism of nothing to bother them ... no worries or care because some pore soul lost it ... in the miasma of life.

Life is questionable? Like how does it occur ... by accident? I was told something of that sort ... thus a vast field of poor understanding that we must experience ... id'll pass!

In some domains nothing is taken more serious than just a Ra bit hole ... that gnawing sense ... Kennedy worms ...
 
Doug Ford just announced Billions to build a Vegas North?
‍♂️


 
Last edited:
I think Ford's focus on development is going to leave a legacy of problems for his successors to clean up. In many other areas, he's actually been not terrible, but on the development front he is so blatantly in the hip pocket of the developers it's sickening. So many of his government's actions have been targeted at expanding development and enriching the developers. Health and education are problem areas, too, but they have been Achilles heels of almost every provincial government from Harris onwards. This focus on development over all else is very much Ford's big thing and it doesn't seem to hurt him that much (though the opposition's weaknesses are part of the reason for that).
 
The thing left behind by developmental politicians ... may be that we develop ourselves out of existence ... and thus minimalization standards?

Imagine that dark spot in the midst of a circle ... ʘ ... sometimes known as bi labial click ... when the lights come on ... often far too latent ...
 
On the one hand, I am glad Canada is taking a role in this. I have a Ukrainian friend at work who is here because of the war. On the other, we are not exactly in the best of fiscal straits ourselves so I hope that's proportional to what the Europeans and Americans are putting up. We are really not in a position to do more than our realistic share.
 
Where has all the fiscality gone?

Into the hands of the ungrateful wealthy it appears ... recall they feel they did it all by themselves!

No respect whatsoever ... it happens!
 
Smedley Butler called it in 1935: “War is a racket.”

*WAR IS A RICH MAN'S GAME PAID FOR WITH POOR PEOPLE'S CHILDREN*

War against a foreign country only happens when the moneyed classes think they are going to profit from it. -George Orwell
 
There's another expression to the tune if you can extract a profit ... let us start a conflict. It appears in the demand that we need more competition and less cooperation ...

Many fight this concept because it resembles comprehension and thinking about knowledge ... that may present itself as something else again ... intellect? We can't have that as we follow love, desire and mindlessness without exception! So there it goes ... thought is out ... explaining mitochondrial matter, the mother of invention!

It is a narrow gate to get through and then a broad way is encountered ... MOG Y's like the Hobbit ... splits!
 
Back
Top