Luke 6: A Verse (or Two) at a Time

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Now I want to write a story from his point of view. "How some dude named Jesus and a bunch of Pharisees f***ed up my life".
The story has a favorable outcome for the man. I just think a different approach to the poor guy would have given him more dignity. But who knows? Maybe he didn't mind being an object lesson for the Pharisees
 
One thing that makes me uncomfortable about this story is that Jesus is using the man with the withered hand to make a point. What if the man would have preferred privacy for his interaction with Jesus and his healing?
;A better example of this issue is the public exposure of Jesus' healing of the woman with the menstrual bleeding problem (Mark 5:25-34). She realizes that anyone she touches is made "unclean." So to avoid public humiliation, she sneaks up behind Jesus, thinking, "I can be healed if I can just touch His garment, unnoticed." But Jesus senses that healing power has gone out of Him and embarrasses her by asking, "Who touched me?" The mere fact that God heals her is a tacit refutation of the validity of Jewish menstrual taboos.
We might say the man should just be grateful for the healing he received. But this reminds me of food bank users who sometimes say the whole experience of having to take whatever they can get is demeaning.
Jesus would be within His rights to ask him and the woman with menstrual bleeding problem, "Would you rather be denied your healing or let me make my teaching point through your healing? It's the height of hubris to demand that God heal you on your own terms.
 
He gets physically healed. But what about his social and emotional state? How are those affected?
There's a biblical story about ten lepers who are healed and only one returns to say thank you. I wonder why this is?

Perhaps the man with the withered hand is grateful.
 
There's a biblical story about ten lepers who are healed and only one returns to say thank you. I wonder why this is?

Perhaps the man with the withered hand is grateful.
"Perhaps?" Who wouldn't be? The 9 lepers were grateful for their healing. They just lacked the courtesy
to express their gratitude to Jesus.
 
"Perhaps?" Who wouldn't be? The 9 lepers were grateful for their healing. They just lacked the courtesy
to express their gratitude to Jesus.
Nowhere in the text (Luke 17: 12-19) does it say the other 9 lepers were grateful. Gratitude would certainly be a reasonable response but the text does not specify this.
 
Nowhere in the text (Luke 17: 12-19) does it say the other 9 lepers were grateful. Gratitude would certainly be a reasonable response but the text does not specify this.
It goes without saying that the 9 lepers were grateful for the fact that they would no longer be shunned by Jewish society. But gratitude is only virtuous when it is expressed to the benefactor.

One neglected issue raised by the healing of the man with the withered hand is Jesus' application of His Messianic secret policy when He has the chance to heal Jews privately. This issue will be developed in my next post.
 
Getting back to today's verse, Jesus asked the man to get up and stand in the middle. So he got up and stood there.

Have we been overlooking the willingness of the man with the withered hand to do Jesus's bidding? Is this an important aspect of the story?

So many ways to look at these things.
 
Getting back to today's verse, Jesus asked the man to get up and stand in the middle. So he got up and stood there.

Have we been overlooking the willingness of the man with the withered hand to do Jesus's bidding? Is this an important aspect of the story?
Defy Jesus' request and forfeit healing. The invalid in John 5 has languished by the healing Pool of Bethzatha for a long time without bothering to ask for help in getting to the pool. So Jesus asks him, "Do you even want to be healed (5:6)?"
 
Getting back to today's verse, Jesus asked the man to get up and stand in the middle. So he got up and stood there.

Have we been overlooking the willingness of the man with the withered hand to do Jesus's bidding? Is this an important aspect of the story?

So many ways to look at these things.
This is showing---- Faith in Action -----This is what James speaks of when He says Faith without action is dead faith ----Saving Faith that you get from hearing the Word always requires a Positive Response ---Through Grace --Healing was there for the man ---and by his action of going to the area where Jesus (who is our Healer still today ) he was healed --

Saving Faith will propel you into action -----Faith is your title deed --your guarantee to having what Grace makes available to you -----
 
Defy Jesus' request and forfeit healing. The invalid in John 5 has languished by the healing Pool of Bethzatha for a long time without bothering to ask for help in getting to the pool. So Jesus asks him, "Do you even want to be healed (5:6)?"
This is interesting, IMO.....was it called the healing pool before he went in?
Had others been healed in this pool before?
 
Are there other requests by Jesus we defy and other things we forfeit?
Very personal question I know.

The Jesus way is to persist in asking even when you have real issues with petitionary prayer:

"Keep on asking and you shall receive (Luke 11:7)."
"You do not have because you do not ask. You ask and do not receive because you ask wrongly, to spend what you get on your pleasures."
"But the doubter, being double-minded and unstable in every way, must not expect to receive anything from the Lord (1:7)."

It's admittedly hard to pray with believing faith when you have a track record of perceived failure in petitionary prayer.
 
The Jesus way is to persist in asking even when you have real issues with petitionary prayer:

"Keep on asking and you shall receive (Luke 11:7)."
"You do not have because you do not ask. You ask and do not receive because you ask wrongly, to spend what you get on your pleasures."
"But the doubter, being double-minded and unstable in every way, must not expect to receive anything from the Lord (1:7)."

It's admittedly hard to pray with believing faith when you have a track record of perceived failure in petitionary prayer.
There is an interesting parable about a woman persisting with her pleas to an unjust judge.(Luke 18: 1-8)
 
There is an interesting parable about a woman persisting with her pleas to an unjust judge.(Luke 18: 1-8)
Yes. And together with the Parable of the Persistent Friend at Midnight (Luke 11:5-8), we have one of many examples of Jesus' sexually parallel parables, 2 parables making a similar point, one of which features a man and the other of which features a woman.
 
Nowhere in the text (Luke 17: 12-19) does it say the other 9 lepers were grateful. Gratitude would certainly be a reasonable response but the text does not specify this.
The nine who did not come back were Jews who did exactly what Jesus told them to do, go to the temple. The tenth, The Samaritan, was not allowed to go to the temple, so he went back to Jesus. He should not have been surprised by the nine not coming back.
 
Hey everybody! Here is Luke 6: 9

We come to the heart of the dispute Jesus was having with the Pharisees about Sabbath observance. He doesn't need many words to express his point of view.

Here is a nice paraphrase from The Message

Remember the Sabbath to keep it holy.

This is the fourth commandment given by God to Moses at Mt Sinai. There are 8 Shall Nots and only two positive commandments. The other positive one is to honor thy mother and thy father.

The people are to labor for six days and rest on the seventh. In Exodus 35, Moses emphasizes the importance of not doing any work on the Sabbath. The penalty for doing so will be severe.


it is not hard to imagine the Pharisees wanting to make sure the people have this right. Other ritual observances are outlined in the Torah but only the Sabbath appears in the Ten Commandments.

Jesus advocates for keeping the spirit of the Law.
 
So protocol creeps into the insecure and indeterminate ... as a way to make things uniformly obscure in high story so there will be a place for truth to hide ... thus down there ... in hies torah as bull, Canon to be melt dead ... Amelda? And it got old fast! Like prop a ganda with a gues furst! Editorial AD's ... spectacularism?

These too are dark and must be torched ... carry a means of spark ... be a bit flinty, bite jaimes ... it follws there is a reaaction in reality ... only in the abstract does it get lost in th'ad ark .. none stuff that's up there ... stay calm but don't stop it! Still waters ... Stills & Gnash?
 
Back
Top