Lo! Signs of the Apocalypse

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Delightful Life

M&M, Cascadian Lovers
Pronouns
She/Her/Her
genties & ladlemen

you've seen the signs -- 2 dollar wednesdays, shave and a haircut, 5 bits --

that something is not. quite. right. slightly offkilter.

let this be a thread as to what is not. quite. right. i'll begin with bambi:

 
Carnivorous birds ... some burds will consume anything ... why the Condor has a bad reputation as an all consuming thinker as a dark metaphor, or off colour angel! The Shadow pre-veils ... happened afore time!

If you've ever spent a 3 day weekend with a dark burd of that nature ... you might be looking for a break ... rapture of the other kind.

Suppose the really emotional Islamic men will get tired of what happens in heaven and want to return and re-order their religion ... then of course if stoicism is a fixed screw-up ... is change only in the abstract ... the imagination?

Epicureanism might be OK in limited nature ... and with free wiles can anything be limited? Appears to be something to pas thro ... just for the experience so we can test all things ... part of the theory of humanism unless you tend towards in-humanism and love bloodshed ... a Roman trait that god set in the spot we call a fabric of time ... damned spot, if you analyse the entire thing and don't deny anything or anybody in the vast body that is generally needy due to the free wiles of a few!

Lets just call it avarice due to the vast urge to control all things by people that do not believe in logic. Consider the range of irrationality and kerygma at high levels of society that tends toward anti-social behaviour... off-set story or tail of relief in heaven? Thus the ruagh winds bleu ID ... thanks to LG Kings theory on pneumatics or dispersed foulers ... sometimes spelt off as mnemonics to maintain chaos ... common folk shouldn't know! Thus meme anon or common things people don't know as they sit in chaotic confusion that is characteristic of kin etic theory of wee things all over the place ... in black and white!

Angels and demons? Once conjured ... does some logic prevail and one revisits what was done purely emotionally? Thus con-juga-Zion ... or the eastern pickling of the sun ... in pacifist old salt ... as such stories go round to take the points and edges off ... po' mudder earth ... a begrimed mire thing that allows for corollaries ...
 
How else would the infinite amuse itself without just observing the same old thing over and over ... constant rear*une ... as a bummer ... cause for ogre ring ... some one could look into mysteries! Carpenters do this in the bush with family trees ...
 
The Apocalypse will be. Whatever begins must end. The end of the material universe was seeded in its beginning, with its beginning. But if we are conscious of, and experience ourselves as, the beginningless and endless energy that we ultimately are, then we delight in our fleeting forms, and are not unduly perturbed by their inevitable end.

Energy can neither be created nor destroyed.
 
Things of incarnation ... appearing as isn't ... thus they weren't and possibly due to lyres ... this is all delusion?

Are authorities good at lyres ... Miss Representation?
 
Some species of deer have been known to eat meat...but poor bird!

Nature has its ways and they don't fit well with our notions of what is right or nice. Poor bird for sure, but deer gotta eat.
 
apocalypse from the greek for uncovering

the discovery that what one thought of 'as reality, ordinary, situation all normal' isn't

the HIDDEN WORLD (found in such things as the occult -- which means 'hidden' -- theosophy -- to larn aboot that HIDDEN WORLD, ye have to talk to Sekrit Masters -- gnosticism -- the One True Reality is hidden from us and we are caged in a False Reality, a Prison -- etc etc etc)

more evidence of the apocalypse

bacteria that EAT ELECTRONS -- yes, matter that EATS energy -- and apparently they LASSO their prey
 
Apocalypse:
From the Greek prefix apo- "away from; off; removed from" and the Greek verb calyptein: "to cover; to conceal," hence Apocalypse literally means "to reveal" or "to take out of hiding."

The apocalypse has already occurred ... it's over ... we are now living in the time after the apocalypse ... the truth is out ... it has been de-occulted ...

I think David Rockefeller sums it up best ....
WE ARE ON THE VERGE OF GLOBAL TRANSFORMATION. ALL WE NEED IS THE RIGHT MAJOR CRISIS AND THE NATIONS WILL ACCEPT THE NEW WORLD ORDER ...
pause for the cause ...9/11
"THE WORLD IS NOW MORE SOPHISTICATED AND PREPARED TO MARCH TOWARDS A WORLD GOVERNMENT. THE SUPRANATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY OF AN INTELLECTUAL ELITE AND WORLD BANKERS IS SURELY PREFERABLE TO THE NATIONAL AUTO-DETERMINATION PRACTICED IN PAST CENTURIES."

NAZI GERMANY ON TECHNOLOGICAL STERIODS
 
Apocalypse:
From the Greek prefix apo- "away from; off; removed from" and the Greek verb calyptein: "to cover; to conceal," hence Apocalypse literally means "to reveal" or "to take out of hiding."

The apocalypse has already occurred ... it's over ... we are now living in the time after the apocalypse ... the truth is out ... it has been de-occulted ...

I think David Rockefeller sums it up best ....
WE ARE ON THE VERGE OF GLOBAL TRANSFORMATION. ALL WE NEED IS THE RIGHT MAJOR CRISIS AND THE NATIONS WILL ACCEPT THE NEW WORLD ORDER ...
pause for the cause ...9/11
"THE WORLD IS NOW MORE SOPHISTICATED AND PREPARED TO MARCH TOWARDS A WORLD GOVERNMENT. THE SUPRANATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY OF AN INTELLECTUAL ELITE AND WORLD BANKERS IS SURELY PREFERABLE TO THE NATIONAL AUTO-DETERMINATION PRACTICED IN PAST CENTURIES."

NAZI GERMANY ON TECHNOLOGICAL STERIODS
Not this s**t again. We went through this last year with Blackbelt. Guess how that went?

Here is his attempt. At least he gave us a jpg:
david_rockefeller_on_the_verge_of_new_world_order.jpg

FALSE.

Want to know what David Rockefeller actually said? I know you don't care about the truth, but here it is anyway:
Forward this to 4:25 to get to the bit you think you're quoting.

The real quote:
"This present window of opportunity which during a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built will not be open for too long. Already there are powerful forces at work that threaten to destroy all of our hopes and efforts."


Here it is on a debunking site:
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/de...sis-and-the-nations-will-accept-the-nwo.1741/
 
Canadians Sued The Bank Of Canada & Won. Mainstream Media & Government Blacks Out Story




http://www.collective-evolution.com...mainstream-media-government-blacks-out-story/



he plaintiffs state that the defendants (officials) are unwittingly and/or wittingly, in varying degrees, knowledge and intent engaged in a conspiracy, along with the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), Financial Stability Forum (FSF), International Monetary Fund (IMF) to render impotent the Bank of Canada Act as well as Canadian sovereignty over financial, monetary, and socio-economic policy, and bypass the sovereign rule of Canada through its parliament by means of the banking and financial systems


The truth is, The Bank of Canada used to issue debt free loans to the government, which meant that the nation would go into debt to private banking institutions. When that changed, private bankers/corporations essentially gained control and ownership of the country.


---------------------

"Give me control of a nation's money, and
I care not who makes her laws"


Mayer Amschel Rothschild



 
Oh FFS. collective-evolution.com is yet another wingnut conspiracy site. Look what else you can find there:

http://www.collective-evolution.com/2015/02/06/gardasil-9-is-this-new-vaccine-licensed-to-kill/

Apparently, this HPV vaccine is "licensed to kill". And what crack reporter found this out? Well, according to her bio at the bottom, she is "super passionate about what toxic chemicals are doing to us and the planet."

That's....super.

As for the article, it seems they did not win. This is the best summary I've read of what happened, from Reddit:

It's been pointed out, but Canadians did not sue the Bank of Canada and win. They actually lost. Their suit was thrown out for having no basis in law that a court could adjudicate. This means there wasn't even the possibility that they could win their suit as the Court didn't even have a real issue to address. As part of that dismissal, the adjudicator also concluded they should not be entitled to amend their pleadings and try to come up with something that might theoretically form the basis for a claim.

The "Canadians" appealed the dismissal and lost. The Federal Court upheld the dismissal and agreed that the claim did not constitute a proper claim or one addressing an issue courts could review. The "Canadians" therefore lost their appeal and the case remains dismissed.

The Federal Court did disagree with the adjudicator, however, about the right to amend the claim to something that wasn't wacky and fake. It found there wasn't a basis in law to prevent the amendment, and so the "Canadians" could try again. If they try again and still can't come up with a real basis for a lawsuit then the dismissal would stand.

Essentially both Courts said it isn't a real lawsuit but the law doesn't prevent the "Canadians" from changing the law suit to something else and trying again.

It's the equivalent of a 75lbs 4'6" eighteen year old trying out for the Olympic hockey team and not making the team but being told he can always try again in four years. Theoretically he might make it then, but only if he comes back a completely different person who is suddenly 6'2" and 210lbs.
So, they were tossed out, then this "win" is them being allowed to come back and try again.

The "mainstream media" are not covering this story because there is no story. Some nutcases tried to sue the BoC, got it all wrong, and that's it. There is nothing to cover. If that analysis is wrong, then explain why. I just don't care to go chasing your conspiracies any more, because they have no credibility in the first place, and I'm never going to change your mind.
 
@chansen .... well done oh good and faithful servant ! So good of you to take time away from your assistance to the state towards enforcing the abduction of innocent children whose misfortune it has been to be born to parents so deluded by their (religious) beliefs that they actually imagine they have a parental right to not submit underage of consent children to chemotherapy and vaccinations ... and at the same time so many parents being willfully ignorant of their parental duty to support emotionally, financially, and medically children of the state (of any age) in their custody to present as a different gender than they were born with ... So much apprehending to do ... and still time to police the dissidents with the good old debunking tactics ...

But anywho ... my original post went out by accident ... thought I had deleted it and was starting over but I guess I was editing instead of starting over ... I would have removed the quotes and put it as an interpretation (I just wasn't fast enough to meet your 15 minute timeframe) ...

So starting over with the benefit of the expert debunkers of theories ...which are in truth (something that I do CARE about deeply and intuitively) actual-in-your-face (no longer hidden) completed conspiracies and will lead to the enactment of the New World Order ... I personally, of my own free will, continue to resist the New Order ... sadly, to all intents and purposes, many souls have already lost their will to CARE (unwittingly I hope) and are following orders as fast as they can.

I still see the following quote (even as approved by @chansen) ...

"Already there are powerful forces at work that threaten to destroy all of our hopes and efforts."


... coming from a powerful force like Rockefeller ... as a warning threat ...

I will leave off the quotes and trust the resident de-bunker to decipher the meaning of these words alleged to be delivered by J.Edgar Hoover ...

The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists. The mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst. It rejects even the assumption that human creatures could espouse a philosophy which must ultimately destroy all that is good and decent.
 
Oh FFS. collective-evolution.com is yet another wingnut conspiracy site. Look what else you can find there:

http://www.collective-evolution.com/2015/02/06/gardasil-9-is-this-new-vaccine-licensed-to-kill/

Apparently, this HPV vaccine is "licensed to kill". And what crack reporter found this out? Well, according to her bio at the bottom, she is "super passionate about what toxic chemicals are doing to us and the planet."

That's....super.

As for the article, it seems they did not win. This is the best summary I've read of what happened, from Reddit:


So, they were tossed out, then this "win" is them being allowed to come back and try again.

The "mainstream media" are not covering this story because there is no story. Some nutcases tried to sue the BoC, got it all wrong, and that's it. There is nothing to cover. If that analysis is wrong, then explain why. I just don't care to go chasing your conspiracies any more, because they have no credibility in the first place, and I'm never going to change your mind.


so your saying the report is not true?
 
@chansen .... well done oh good and faithful servant ! So good of you to take time away from your assistance to the state towards enforcing the abduction of innocent children whose misfortune it has been to be born to parents so deluded by their (religious) beliefs that they actually imagine they have a parental right to not submit underage of consent children to chemotherapy and vaccinations ... and at the same time so many parents being willfully ignorant of their parental duty to support emotionally, financially, and medically children of the state (of any age) in their custody to present as a different gender than they were born with ... So much apprehending to do ... and still time to police the dissidents with the good old debunking tactics ...
Interesting hyperbole.

But anywho ... my original post went out by accident ... thought I had deleted it and was starting over but I guess I was editing instead of starting over ... I would have removed the quotes and put it as an interpretation (I just wasn't fast enough to meet your 15 minute timeframe) ...
Seriously? That's your excuse? At least Blackbelt owns his screwups, sorta. You're going to claim you were going to edit what is a fictitious quote that is commonly used on conspiracy sites, and massage it into an "interpretation"?

And when the 15 minute edit window collapsed, you didn't bother creating a new post, pointing out your own error?

Come on.

So starting over with the benefit of the expert debunkers of theories ...which are in truth (something that I do CARE about deeply and intuitively) actual-in-your-face (no longer hidden) completed conspiracies and will lead to the enactment of the New World Order ... I personally, of my own free will, continue to resist the New Order ... sadly, to all intents and purposes, many souls have already lost their will to CARE (unwittingly I hope) and are following orders as fast as they can.

I still see the following quote (even as approved by @chansen) ...

"Already there are powerful forces at work that threaten to destroy all of our hopes and efforts."


... coming from a powerful force like Rockefeller ... as a warning threat ...

I will leave off the quotes and trust the resident de-bunker to decipher the meaning of these words alleged to be delivered by J.Edgar Hoover ...

The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists. The mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst. It rejects even the assumption that human creatures could espouse a philosophy which must ultimately destroy all that is good and decent.
More scare tactics and quotes taken out of context.
 
so your saying the report is not true?
Read my post again. I explain it as I understand it, and I think I do so very clearly.

They did not win the case. They "won" a do-over. That is not a win. That's a loss, with the opportunity to probably lose again at a later date.

If I am wrong, I am inviting you to show me where I am wrong.
 
Back
Top