Frankly I went to the Christian Channel YT page a while back. Their own self-description made me sense that they were NOT an academically relevant channel at all (a truly academic or faith seeking understanding approach to Scripture would NOT use the KJV exclusively). So I have chosen not to watch any of their (I assume quite polemical) videos. The fact taht all the thumbnails are obviously AI generated does not help their case
I suggest Unsafe is actually weakening her arguments in this thread by using them
Well for starters there GordW ---I am not posting the Videos to make any arguments about anything -----
but not surprised of your having negative comments about the Channel and 
Videos --
The Videos Folks have a Lot of Truth in them following the Scriptures and the animation bring the Truth to life ----in my opinion ----so to make up your own mind you need to watch the Videos and decide for yourselves how you feel about the information they are spewing out ---research what they say as I do ------and read along with the Transcript that they provide for each video ----Good Spiritual Knowledge and History in these videos being presented ----Totally recommend them for those interested -----
and here is one that we all know about--After-the Flood -----Just posting some of the transcript for this Video ----the video you can see on the Christian Channel Youtube ----
What God Never Explained After the Flood
the Video and the transcript says ---
Genesis 8 describes the moment when Noah removed the covering of the ark and looked out. The face of the ground was dry.
This is Truth what the video says -above ---scripture here to prove it ----
Genesis 8 NIV
13 By the first day of the first month of Noah’s six hundred and first year, the water had dried up from the earth.
Noah then removed the covering from the ark and saw that the surface of the ground was dry.
Video says ----
-this is truth here in what is said -below -----there is no scripture on this
There is no description of bodies, no mention of submerged cities, lost civilizations, of the thousands, perhaps millions, who had perished.
Video says -----and Transcript says -------Noah built an altar and offered burnt offerings
Noah built an altar.He offered burnt offerings.
I say------- did Noah build and altar like the video says -----YEP ! -----Truth in the Video Folks -----
Genesis 8:20-11:9
20
And Noah builded an altar unto the Lord; and took of every clean beast, and of every clean fowl, and offered burnt offerings on the altar.
Video says -----
And then something extraordinary happened.
God spoke.For the first time since commanding the construction of the ark, the creator addressed the survivor.
And these words form what theologians call the Noah covenant, a pact not only with Noah but with all creation.In Genesis 9:es 8-17,
God establishes an unconditional promise. Never again would he destroy the earth with waters of a flood.
The sign of this covenant would be visible in the heavens. The rainbow.
I say ---did god speak to Noah and family as the video says ---YEP!
---More Truth Folks ----
Genesis 9 AMP
Covenant of the Rainbow
9
And God blessed Noah and his sons and said to them,
Never again would he destroy the earth with waters of a flood. The sign of this covenant would be visible in the heavens. The rainbow.
I say ------So What didn't God Explain after the Flood
Video and Transcript say ------
God did not explain---- He did not reveal the eternal destiny of those who died. He did not clarify whether the Nephilim, those beings mentioned in Genesis 6, born of the union between the sons of God and the daughters of men, had been completely exterminated or whether something of them remained----
I say -------YEP!
Truth here Folks ----God did not explain any of this in Scripture -----here ---
The Video goes into Noah being drunk and Ham finding him sleeping naked and gives why Canaan was cursed ---and not Ham ----the Bible again is not forthcoming in telling us the details of what had act occurred so we can only speculate and that is what the Video does ---it gives 3 interpretations that people have come up with ----
video states ---3 interpretations by people
Why? Jewish tradition preserved multiple explanations, and none of them are simple.
The Talmud in tractate Sanhedrin folio 70 presents two disturbing possibilities
The first attributed to Rabbi Shuel suggests that Ham castrated his own father. An act that would explain why Noah even while living another 350 years never fathered another son.
The second attributed to Rabbi Yokanan proposes something even darker that Ham sexually violated Noah while he was unconscious.
But there is a
third interpretation that has gained strength among modern scholars based on a careful analysis of the Hebrew expression.
The phrase to uncover nakedness gala erva appears repeatedly in the book of Leviticus 18.
And there its meaning is unequivocal. It does not simply mean to see someone naked. It is a euphemism for illicit sexual relations.
Leviticus 18:8 is explicit The nakedness of thy father's wife shalt thou not uncover.
Leviticus 18:8 AMP
8 You shall not uncover the nakedness of your father’s wife; it is your father’s nakedness.
From Google ----So Video as well as Google is only speculating on the curse of Canaan -----Folks -----
In Genesis 9, Noah curses Canaan, Scholars propose three main theories: Canaan may have directly participated in the transgression, Ham was already blessed by God so Noah shifted the curse, or it served to disinherit an unlawful lineage.
Three primary explanations are debated by theologians and biblical scholars:
Direct Complicity: Some scholars suggest that Canaan was also present and actively involved in the disrespectful or abusive act against his grandfather. [
1,
2]
Divine Precedence: In Genesis 9:1, God had already blessed Ham and his other sons. Because an overarching divine blessing had already been given to Ham, Noah may have bypassed cursing him directly and directed the judgment toward his offspring. [
1]
The "Mother" Theory: Many modern scholars (and traditions in Jewish literature) interpret Ham's act of seeing his father's nakedness as a euphemism for a sexual transgression, such as incest with Noah's wife (Ham's mother). Under this interpretation, Canaan was the product of this illicit union, which resulted in his disinheritance. [
1,
2,
3]
So my view is ------
I say ---as you can see FOLKS all the Videos are doing is taking Scripture ---truth and putting animation to it -----so the people who are feeding negative vibes about these videos are not wanting to view and obtain bible knowledge and Bible History that these videos are Displaying using Scripture --
Believe me if these Videos were not adhering to Scripture I wouldn't be watching them ----I check out and research what is being said -----
For instance they give a reference as to their information on Noah's nakedness --I read their speculation==
Bergsma, J. & Hahn, S. — “Noah’s Nakedness and the Curse of Canaan” (Journal of Biblical Literature)
You can read it here =====
Noah's Nakedness and the Curse on Canaan (Genesis 9:20-27)
