Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To be another hot smoky day.
Translate please, Jae
For the most part, I can figure it out...brain is fuzzy today due to the smoky air. And yes, that would be a great description for salmon.Translate BethAnne? Wow, I thought you were doing really well at understanding my gibberish. Anyway, I said - "Hot... smoky... that woulds wound goop devow edit allking outs almond," meaning...
Hot... smokey... that would sound good if you were talking about salmon.
For the most part, I can figure it out...brain is fuzzy today due to the smoky air. And yes, that would be a great description for salmon.
Paper has been wrapped up and sent to the printer. I have the rest of the weekend off now to watch the Stampede semi-finals and finals on TV![]()
Is it the Albertan taxpayers who end up paying the bill for the Stampede?
It is...they do still get provincial culture funds, sponsorship funds, raffle funds, etc.Doesn't the Stampede make money? There are buildings/grounds that are used for various things year round, but I would think the event itself is net-positive.
Same here, hanging out in the bedroom today.To be another hot smoky day.
True, with Jae's question though, the Stampede is bringing money in for Albertans, the taxpayers aren't covering the event.It is...they do still get provincial culture funds, sponsorship funds, raffle funds, etc.
Not like the Pan-Am games, no...however taxpayer money is still used.True, with Jae's question though, the Stampede is bringing money in for Albertans, the taxpayers aren't covering the event.
Not like the Pan-Am games, no...however taxpayer money is still used.
Strictly referring to taxpayers' contributions.BethAnne - Are you suggesting that the PanAm Games are going to earn profit for the city?
It would be interesting to know who makes what from the Pan Am games. Someone somewhere's making a mittful.
Strictly referring to taxpayers' contributions.
The Calgary Winter Games did (and I think Salt Lake City did, too) but they are the exception rather than the rule.
Come again Mendalla? As far as I know the one and only Olympics that actually made money was Atlanta.
Mindful of the financial disaster the Montreal Olympics became, OCO'88 parlayed its ability to generate television and sponsorship revenues and government support into what was ultimately a C$170 million surplus.[20] (The claim of a surplus has frequently been challenged as OCO'88 counted only its own revenues and expenses and did not include government funded facilities in its accounting.[78]) The surplus was turned into endowment funds split between Canada Olympic Park ($110 million) and CODA, which was reformed following the Games to manage the Olympic facilities with a trust fund that had subsequently grown to be worth over $200 million by 2013.[20] Consequently, all five of the primary facilities built for the 1988 Olympics remained operational in their original intended purpose 25 years after the Games concluded.[79]