Delightful Life
M&M, Cascadian Lovers
- Pronouns
- She/Her/Her
What do you think aboot it? What do you yourself get from it? Helpful? Not helpful? Blasphemous? Bueller?
#PlatinumAge
#PlatinumAge
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
onlinebibleinstitute.org
So classic Gnosticism. A lot of non-canonical Gospels hew that way to varying degrees. It is an interesting take but not an especially "Christian" one and there are definitely reasons it got sidelined when the canon was drawn up. The whole "the Creator is an evil fake god" alone was guaranteed to put it out of the mainstream. And it is arguably even more anti-Semitic than orthodox Christianity given the implication that the Jews follow this "fake god".Rejection of the Old Testament: Marcion outrightly rejected the Old Testament and its God. He viewed the material world, which he believed was created by the Demiurge, as intrinsically evil in opposition to the spiritual realm introduced by Jesus.
So classic Gnosticism.
I'll take The Gospel of Judas for 30 pieces of silver, Delightful.for some reason i am finding myself categorizing Christians who disgusted the body and its functions to be Gnostic; i don't know where that came fro.
The Gnostics certainly did see the physical universe as corrupt given it was created by the Demiurge. But not sure if other Christian traditions who think that way got it from them or if they all got it from schools of Greek philosophy that devalued the physical world and senses in favour of "ideas" and reason.some reason i am finding myself categorizing Christians who disgusted the body and its functions to be Gnostic; i don't know where that came fro.
There is no difference between the God of the OT and the NT. This one God has battled adversity since before our creation and during it. His is not the rebellious elohim or their followers which of course became mankind, but against adversity itself. It's kind of like trying to put a stop to cancer today.
There is no difference between the God of the OT and the NT. This one God has battled adversity since before our creation and during it. His is not the rebellious elohim or their followers which of course became mankind, but against adversity itself. It's kind of like trying to put a stop to cancer today.
He is the God of Creation so He is the God of everyone. Many just don't want to admit it, and throughout history the powers and principalities of the rebellious elohim have ruled all nations except one. You know, the small g gods.By that argument, the God represented by the Qu'ran is also the one god. The Abrahamic god - One Monotheistic god, Three Religions.
Which one haven't they ruled? To my eye human politics and governance are inevitably this.throughout history the powers and principalities of the rebellious elohim have ruled all nations except one
By that argument, the God represented by the Qu'ran is also the one god. The Abrahamic god - One Monotheistic god, Three Religions.
Which one haven't they ruled? To my eye human politics and governance are inevitably this.
The holy land..His only nation. But don't confuse it with the people. Chosen means those who follow His willl, not inhabit.Which one haven't they ruled?
The holy land..His only nation. But don't confuse it with the people. Chosen means those who follow His willl, not inhabit.