Weak analogy because slaves have done nothing to deserve their fate. Besides, Paul opposes slavery in Philemon.The Bible also presents precedent for slavery. Does that mean slavery is moral?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weak analogy because slaves have done nothing to deserve their fate. Besides, Paul opposes slavery in Philemon.The Bible also presents precedent for slavery. Does that mean slavery is moral?
Weak analogy because slaves have done nothing to deserve their fate. Besides, Paul opposes slavery in Philemon.
Weak response, because it evades the issue, rather than answer the question.Weak analogy because slaves have done nothing to deserve their fate. Besides, Paul opposes slavery in Philemon.
In the Old Covenant - which we're no longer under. Jesus' teachings focused on love, mercy, and forgiveness. His actions and words emphasized the value of every human life and the importance of showing compassionHe would point out that the Bible provides precedent for the death penalty.
And Mathew opposes the death penalty inWeak analogy because slaves have done nothing to deserve their fate. Besides, Paul opposes slavery in Philemon.
Thus a govt has to decide what really is best for the whole country rather than a few. Those in power ( courts) should not be driven by others emotion but facts.Americans are well aware of that the death penalty does not seem to promote deterrence. For most Americans what TRUMPS that objection is execution as the just punishment for murder, closure for the victim's family, and cost effectiveness compared to life imprisonment.
Which contravenes international law, for which he has no say.U.S. border agents told to summarily deport migrants without granting asylum hearings under Trump edict
ANd show a total absence of grace or mercy....which I was led to believe are key concepts in ScriptureWeak response, because it evades the issue, rather than answer the question.
Probably the same thing he does now which is respect him, love him and focus on his merits.I wonder what he would do if Barron revealed he was gay?
In Canada the abolition of the death penalty in 1976, has not led to the increase of homicide rates. In fact they are 23% lower.
( Statistics Canada)
How does that connect with the death penalty becoming federal law now in the USA?Wyrdly enough, thank you, Freakonomics, a huge predictor in the rate of homicide is the status of abortion laws 15-20 years previous. Apparently, unwanted boys, in particular, become very angry in the target testosterone ranges (15-35 roughly).
But agreed, that death penalties don't correlate with decreased homicide rates. What does, again, curiously, is latitude. If it's cold more, suicide is more prevalent than where it's warm, where homicides dominate.
How does that connect with the death penalty becoming federal law now in the USA?
Decisively refuted by this article on Hermeneutics:And Mathew opposes the death penalty in
Mathew 5:38-50.
Are you relating to the theory that since abortion was legalized, that those who terminated their pregnancies contributed to the lower homicide rate because their unwanted children would likely have grown up to become murderers?I'm pointing out that co-incidence does not equal causation.
The decreased homicide rate in Canada had everything to do with increased access to abortion and less about the discontinued death penalty.
I disagree with this article but I could concede to only God having that authority.....not humans.Decisively refuted by this article on Hermeneutics:
![]()
Does Jesus condemn the death penalty in Matthew 5:38-39? If not, what did he mean?
In Matthew 5:38-39 Jesus says: Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy ...hermeneutics.stackexchange.com