What Legacy Does Trump Leave?

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Register Log in
A
Mendalla said:
Poilievre is very aware of the Parliamentary rules and could and should have realized that calling your opponent a "whacko" repeatedly would not fly. There's a point to having rules of debate in the House of Commons and part of that is to avoid having the proceedings degenerate into this kind of juvenile name calling. He could have made his point without the insults. IOW, there is no gag order here. He broke rules in full awareness of those rules and the Speaker rightly imposed consquences. It has happened to many MPs, even occasionally government members and cabinet ministers, over the years and decades so this is not the Liberals "gagging" Poilievre. I, for one, want civil, thoughtful debate in the House, not this kind of playground BS.

(PS. it also would not fly in a lot of organized debates, not just parliamentary ones, and the consequences for doing so and not obeying the speakers request to apologize or retract them would be similar)
Click to expand...
Absolutely, one Marjorie Taylor Green is enough in the world.
 
NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh was the last party leader to be expelled from the House in 2020 after he refused to apologize and withdraw comments calling Bloc MP Alain Therrien racist.

A search of House of Commons transcripts dating back to 2001 shows the word “wacko” has been uttered by Liberal, NDP and Conservative MPs in nine previous instances. But in each case, the qualifier was not directed at a specific individual, whereas Poilievre used it to qualify Trudeau.
 
F
WhyCzar said:
NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh was the last party leader to be expelled from the House in 2020 after he refused to apologize and withdraw comments calling Bloc MP Alain Therrien racist.

A search of House of Commons transcripts dating back to 2001 shows the word “wacko” has been uttered by Liberal, NDP and Conservative MPs in nine previous instances. But in each case, the qualifier was not directed at a specific individual, whereas Poilievre used it to qualify Trudeau.
Click to expand...
FYI, there is a thread to discuss Poilievre.
 
All is trumped ... there is a mule among us!

PS: Did you see the news of the swamp donkey wondering in Fredericton? What's a swamp donkey? That's a Moos'g (MU's g?) question! Gamma is gritæ*cal!

"Ca" being the spirit and "L" being de Laam, or delight ... ambiguine? The guans on ... some say goons! Intellect always backs down ...
 
There is some very disturbing information coming from this interview

I saw an interview with the man who interviewed trump. Apparently there is a transcript of the two sessions he did with trump.

How Far Would Trump Go?
 
Brutality is the watchword ... and speaking of such things puts the fear of such God-Loving man (Don 've auld) in the hearts of those without conscience!

That's alternate virtue ... and neither virtue can be observed because of the great shadow ... an idle monster? He is about to get busy like some Canons of the past ... the thump is distant and quiet ... incarnate?

Makes no sense does it ... but that's the ideal ... the commoners are not to know so lie to them! It is a profuse power ...
 
It is said he will not accept another election if it is not honest!

How does this get laid out in the alternate universe? Imagine alternate virtues as in the definition of contempt ... sort of an internal conflicting sentient?

All is lost in the chaos ... Nietzsche (man named after the darkness of Nacht)! Some places known as Elvira as viral, a dark templar instance in the mine 've that man excavating the past? Such is said to be quest ion able and thus deionized ... thus the plasma of psyche as chez took off ...

Don't look as is ... a mule! Enigmatic ... all may be lost because of vast unknowns ... das ole! Then if the populace didn't wish to ... they didn't ... and the light went out as dah Laam! Fuzzy escape ...
 
What kind of voters do you figure elected Trump the blind emotional, or the wide Ide intellectual sort?

The answer seems evident ... but not as either extreme would SAE it ... thus SAE'd ism ... in humane! The SAE Ra was once Sarah and led Abraeham as a darker personality type ... he fell out of the auto OHM eists of the mountains ... what a dew'd character ... causing back ground chuckles in the hidden resources of psyche! Emotional people react to Herr ... as UR 'd!

Futures are made up as we go ... folly? Sure thing ...
 
What is the purpose of a witness?
  • Is it to sway the jury?
  • Alternately is it a post activity that those up front believe is prejudiced as it follows them for some time?
The latent situation is often later after the former has stooped to get an advantage over the lesser folk that are considered demos ...

This happens as we pass through a domain where "not knowing" is popular as the con science rests in a dark space! Hypo for the idea of trauma and mesmerizing what was not WOKE at the time of the activity!

There was a news article a short while ago about unconscious dreams in which folk were dissonant in the night ... that's Eris! Cerulean (deep blue, etc.) Azu'R phoque ... sealed in a jar of a different nature ... vast potential as a rub after the rendering down! Literary scatter for the puzzling ...

Imagine sleeping in the halls of floating justice ... the flush is upon us! Like the pure mechanics of "AI" ... aye? Sight unseen ... the cover needs to be lifted ... many say to leave the lid on it ... lol, or perhaps lil -ith? ("ith" is defined as a small item in some definitions; like a bow son, and the whine ensues from the fiddling with ocher earth!) Imagine unthinkable topics ... stuff done without clues ... is that alter to mindful? Wood containments ... Magi forest! Green stuff ... chemerae? Chez Marie ... carrion?

Thus vultures and committees ... wakes????? Imagine the bending of wings ...
 
Last edited:
Yeesh, I wouldn't be interested if I were an American unless there was an agreement to only turn on the mike for the one answering the question and the other ( or others if RFK is there) waits his turn.
Otherwise it becomes nonsensical and incoherent ranting.
 
jimkenney12 said:
Interesting, especially if neither end up on the ballot.
Click to expand...
You think there is a chance of that happening? Biden is basically a shoo-in, being a sitting president with no serious internal opposition now that Kennedy has gone third-party. And Trump seems set as well. It's looking like even a conviction can't stop him given that he basically owns the RNC now, who would be the ones to decide if he can still stand for the nomination. Maybe one of them will die or get serious ill before the party conventions but I'm not holding my breath.
 
Incoherence and chaos is desired by the powers ... so the populace remains in the dark!

What could brighten them up ... a sort of WOKE process? Not this slow aching drag ...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top