Was it though? Or was it to point to worldly ways and oppression at the time? Just throwing that out there .....Yes. It did mean that but it means something different now. And money was used as a metaphor for non-material gifts.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Was it though? Or was it to point to worldly ways and oppression at the time? Just throwing that out there .....Yes. It did mean that but it means something different now. And money was used as a metaphor for non-material gifts.
Well, it is. Mathematics is one of the few areas where such truths can actually exist. The ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter is always pi. No exceptions, no alternative opinions, it is just a fact. The problem is that in the world of human relations and thought, where religion falls, there are no such absolute truths, no matter how much some might argue there are.
True enough. There is also the question of what behaviour goes along with the POV
True enough. There is also the question of what behaviour goes along with the POV
You are sounding a lot like Amy-Jill Levine. She always says look for a parable's simplest explanation.Was it though? Or was it to point to worldly ways and oppression at the time? Just throwing that out there .....
True. I wasn’t factoring in bad-faith arguments, or those with intentions of power and greed and oppression.Thus we enter the domain of extremists ... and politicians, etc. It is said these need to be in government and with the business-government corruption it is all mixed up ...
Mike Johnson states the government needs to be a Christian success so there it is ...
"There are no such absolute truths, no matter how much some might argue there are"Well, it is. Mathematics is one of the few areas where such truths can actually exist. The ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter is always pi. No exceptions, no alternative opinions, it is just a fact. The problem is that in the world of human relations and thought, where religion falls, there are no such absolute truths, no matter how much some might argue there are.
EDIT: Actually, that might be conditional on having three spatial dimensions. Forget if pi holds in higher dimensions. But it is absolute for our universe.
Then as now. The only way out of the worldly ways, while in this world, is to place more value on growing the non-material gifts.Was it though? Or was it to point to worldly ways and oppression at the time? Just throwing that out there .....
You are sounding a lot like Amy-Jill Levine. She always says look for a parable's simplest explanation.
What about sharing the material gifts equitably?Then as now. The only way out of the worldly ways, while in this world, is to place more value on growing the non-material gifts.
Well then I wouldn't have presented the idea that the third servant was to be admired and the master was evil in my initial thoughts at the beginning of this thread ... It's not the popular thinking, but I intend to keep my thoughts open when presented with a good argument. So if a simple solution fits more....im trying to remain open to that. Jesus' explanations for the parable of the seeds and the parable of the sower are fairly simple for example.You are sounding a lot like Amy-Jill Levine. She always says look for a parable's simplest explanation.
I don't think Jesus was against wealth, just how it's used maybe?Then as now. The only way out of the worldly ways, while in this world, is to place more value on growing the non-material gifts.
"There are no such absolute truths, no matter how much some might argue there are"
How do you know that statement is true?
Who said it and what is the context? In mathematics there definitely are absolute truths. In some sciences, too. But in philosophy, theology, ethics, and such? No, not really. There's almost always a counterargument for any truth claim in those."There are no such absolute truths, no matter how much some might argue there are"
How do you know that statement is true?
Who said it and what is the context? In mathematics there definitely are absolute truths. In some sciences, too. But in philosophy, theology, ethics, and such? No, not really. There's almost always a counterargument for any truth claim in those.
You said it above!Who said it and what is the context? In mathematics there definitely are absolute truths. In some sciences, too. But in philosophy, theology, ethics, and such? No, not really. There's almost always a counterargument for any truth claim in those.
You said it above!
Good words, RabbiThe problem with the story is the assumption that we are supposed to innately know what to do without having been taught or discussing it, or before we’ve learned through trial and error. That’s not fair, or realistic. People who’ve been through many trials often end up with multiple talents.