I'm thinking there's one truth in his meaning? Otherwise, what is truth?And how do we know the Holy Spirit says the same thing to everyone?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm thinking there's one truth in his meaning? Otherwise, what is truth?And how do we know the Holy Spirit says the same thing to everyone?
I'm not the host of this BPoTW but go for it!It might be good to read how Jesus' explanation for the two parables he did explain, lines up with the story.
Or many truths?I'm thinking there's one truth in his meaning?
But then as I asked above, what is truth....does it change?Or many truths?
It might be good to read how Jesus' explanation for the two parables he did explain, lines up with the story.
This is a great discussion you are hosting here @jimkenney12 and we haven't even considered these questions yet!This is how I intend to use the story, pointing to the master knowing his slaves and how much trust he could have in them. I will invite listeners to consider how they make decisions to trust and how they can live to earn the trust of others.
It could be the Spirit is guiding us to different aspects of truth. Say in this parable, leading us to consider different facets of the story. Perhaps it depends on what we need to hear or what we have to offer others?But then as I asked above, what is truth....does it change?
Polarity management if you will. Is this still a thing? It was big in organizational theory before I retired. It basically posits that two sides of an argument can both be right. It's kind of counterintuitive. The goal is not compromise but making room for all.
Yes. It did mean that but it means something different now. And money was used as a metaphor for non-material gifts.I think it's at least good to remember that talent means a unit of money.
Pi as an example of absolute truth?Pi is said to be irrational by some and yet has its purpose ... especially forming circles ... an initial line may be required ...
Yes. It did mean that but it means something different now. And money was used as a metaphor for non-material gifts.
As long as you don't go far with that. I mean, you have a segment who would use that to argue that Holocaust deniers and other hatemongers have a legitimate argument.It basically posits that two sides of an argument can both be right.
Pi as an example of absolute truth?
A very plausible explanation but not the only one.Yes. It did mean that but it means something different now. And money was used as a metaphor for non-material gifts.
Well, it is. Mathematics is one of the few areas where such truths can actually exist. The ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter is always pi. No exceptions, no alternative opinions, it is just a fact. The problem is that in the world of human relations and thought, where religion falls, there are no such absolute truths, no matter how much some might argue there are.Pi as an example of absolute truth?
As long as you don't go far with that. I mean, you have a segment who would use that to argue that Holocaust deniers and other hatemongers have a legitimate argument.
True enough. There is also the question of what behaviour goes along with the POVAs long as you don't go far with that. I mean, you have a segment who would use that to argue that Holocaust deniers and other hatemongers have a legitimate argument.