Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But how is that different from a significant percentage of people in any church's pews? People are quite happy with the "comfort the afflicted" side of the equation moreso than the "afflict the comfortable" side. I saw a UU minister go down because the congregation didn't like her overall message and thrust of her ministry, which challenged the church in some serious ways (including calling it a church).You sound like the crowd in Isaiah, ch. 30, 'Speak to us smooth things, prophesy illusions.' IOW 'Don't upset my apple cart.'
How can a Minister Preach and explain with confidence and assurance and experience to people in the pews --This ---the peace that Jesus talked about beyond all human understanding is real and is consistently there when the Minister hasn't experienced such peace himself -----and by telling the people that this peace is available without having it personally is being hypocritical----as they are making the people believe that they themselves have this peace --
The Minister can't truly convey the calmness and tranquil feeling on the inside when all hell breaks loose on the outside or when extremely bad situations come upon the doorstep if he or she has not experienced this great peace --which can only come from relying totally on God who is the only person who can give us this type of peace -----
There is a story in 2 Kings of that peace that surpasses all human understanding and the woman who could have truly preached on this Peace because she had the peace herself ----
Read all yourselves -----
![]()
Bible Gateway passage: 2 Kings 4:18-37 - English Standard Version
Elisha Raises the Shunammite's Son - When the child had grown, he went out one day to his father among the reapers. And he said to his father, “Oh, my head, my head!” The father said to his servant, “Carry him to his mother.” And when he had lifted him and brought him to his mother, the child...www.biblegateway.com
2 Kings 4:18-37 ESV
Elisha Raises the Shunammite's Son
18 When the child had grown, he went out one day to his father among the reapers. 19 And he said to his father, “Oh, my head, my head!” The father said to his servant, “Carry him to his mother.”
20 And when he had lifted him and brought him to his mother, the child sat on her lap till noon, and then he died.
I say ----The normal reaction would be far from inner peace having this happen her son dying in her lap not knowing what happened to him ----but this lady had the Faith and Peace of God rooted and grounded in her inner Spirit and Her calm words were ------ALL Will Be Well ---as she trusted God and His servant to restore her son's life --she didn't pay attention to what her husband was saying about the Sabbath and noon ----She trusted God not man ---
verses
22 Then she called to her husband and said, “Send me one of the servants and one of the donkeys, that I may quickly go to the man of God and come back again.” 23 And he said, “Why will you go to him today? It is neither new moon nor Sabbath.” She said, “All is well.”
I say ----this is the real peace Jesus is ta;king about folks -----no situation not even death can move you from the peace of God -----which defies all human understanding ------
Or perhaps Mark misunderstood it?
With all due respect, your Princeton professor was mistaken. That approach to “evangelism” led to such things as rampant colonialism, robbery of land already occupied for thousands of years by others, and the Residential School system, among other historic evils. The way of “WE have the TRUTH! You poor blighters should just shut up and listen to us!” has produced much more of hell than heaven throughout history. The Gospel message is not as simplistic, nor as straightforward, as people like you and unsafe want it to be.UCCans like you and Jim Kenney illustrate the typical UCCan ploy of ignoring Jesus' well established self-understanding to simplistically invent a progressive Jesus to suit their denominational agenda. They have no basis for challenging the authenticity of Mark 10:45, which of course derives compelling support from other well established sayings of Jesus.
Lame attempts to find common ground among religions and build a spirituality based on parallelomania is scorned by historians of religion because this ploy distorts the distinctiveness of each religion and betrays a superficial grasp of them. Indeed, this thread displays profound ignorance of the actual biblical basis for an irenic perspective on other religions, an ignorance betrayed by the frequent disdain here for proof-texting that is required to demonstrate competence. As Bible text critic, B. F. Wescott famously said, "The simple Gospel is not so simple as the simple would have you suppose." My Princeton philosophy professor put the Christian's task succinctly: "Our job is not to make the Gospel relevant to society, but to make society
relevant to the Gospel."
Sort of reminds me of that old adage that spoke of the conflict between simplicity/complexity and complexity/simplicity as a reflective switch ... indicating that folks should look at things both ways!With all due respect, your Princeton professor was mistaken. That approach to “evangelism” led to such things as rampant colonialism, robbery of land already occupied for thousands of years by others, and the Residential School system, among other historic evils. The way of “WE have the TRUTH! You poor blighters should just shut up and listen to us!” has produced much more of hell than heaven throughout history. The Gospel message is not as simplistic, nor as straightforward, as people like you and unsafe want it to be.
The approach taken in the opening post, that of finding common ground and points of contact, will be much more productive of peace, goodwill, and justice, as well as reconciliation and peaceful coexistence, than the enculturated stance you seem to have adopted. Frankly, it seems you have more in common with the ‘Patriotic’ Republican terrorists than with people like Paul the Apostle.
To paraphrase a phrase from the Gospels, Christianity was made for the world, and not the world for Christianity. There’s a huge gap between those two perspectives. And a huge difference in the ways of being in the world between them.
LOL, your response sadly betrays your ignorance of what the spirituality of the Gospel actually entails--experientiall0y as well as doctrinally. SoWith all due respect, your Princeton professor was mistaken. That approach to “evangelism” led to such things as rampant colonialism, robbery of land already occupied for thousands of years by others, and the Residential School system, among other historic evils. The way of “WE have the TRUTH! You poor blighters should just shut up and listen to us!” has produced much more of hell than heaven throughout history. The Gospel message is not as simplistic, nor as straightforward, as people like you and unsafe want it to be.
It appears that the future of religion in general is uncertain. Check out this BBC article. I enjoyed it.
The Future of Religion
I'm mindful of the premise of American Gods. That all of the gods who have been worshipped in humanity's history still exist in the spiritual realm.
I don't see evidence, in history, in my personal spiritual journey, that suggests that there is ONE CORRECT version of ONE RELIGION. That strikes me, largely, as damned-fool-ism.
(And on a personal note, mystic and unsafe have persuaded me to train myself out of any use of the acronym "lol", as it's never laughing with you, always laughing at you.)
It comes up in Sandman to some degree, too. Gaiman loves mythology and it shows in his work time and time again.I'm mindful of the premise of American Gods.
Gaiman loves mythology and it shows in his work time and time again.