For the record, I am not arguing for abortion.
For the record, I am not arguing against it.
I am arguing against it being a matter of 'political' persuasion one way or the other.
Technology and science have given women unprecedented options and control over fertility since 1973.
Back then, single women had only recently gained nationwide access to birth control.
Now we have these incredibly effective contraceptive methods available.
The morning-after pill without a prescription - keep some in the medicine cabinet for 'emergencies'.
Smartphones send birth control reminders.
A matchstick-size implant gives no-hassle contraception for years at a time.
Surgical abortion has become safer, employing tools that use vacuum pressure rather than scraping.
Medication alternative: Ending a pregnancy with mifepristone and misoprostol.
Sit in the comfort of your home instead of doing it in a clinic or in a back alley.
For women today, there's even abortion by mail.
Images of coat hangers 'sometimes' used in illegal abortions many decades ago - no longer relevant.
Warnings that large numbers of women would die from unsafe abortions if Roe were overturned don't reflect the fact that abortion-related deaths - which numbered as high as 2,700 in 1930 - fell to under 200 a year by the mid-1960s thanks to the development of antibiotics and other medical advances.
To the extent that women can get and use misoprostol to end pregnancies at home, women even in states with bans would have a relatively safe option. It's available only by prescription in the U.S. but is available online from some countries where it is sold over the counter.
Changing the laws on a 'political' level will not put those 'genies back in the bottle'.