TRUMP - Some people think......... How do you feel?

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Register Log in
Some of those refugees, by the way, may well come from the southwest US where underground water reservoirs have been used up. The do not refill with rain because they're too deep.
 
Graeme Decarie said:
Dyer is very, very qualified, indeed in his first field, which is military history. And I think all his projections on the military (war) results of climate change are bang on - and they are already happening. Starvation is spreading in Africa, for example. And all of the projected models of the day have NOT proven false. As well, he spent a great deal of his research for that book in consulting with recognized experts in the study of climate change. The U.S. military takes seriously enough that it has a whole department of top scientists studying the implications of climate change.
And among the projections that are holding up is that world food supply has flattened. And it has done so despite a rapidly growing population.
We haven't been able to handle 80 million refugees. What will we do when it hits 800,000,000 million - soon?
And quoting Revelations is not a useful way to help millions of the starving.
It's true, of course, that rivers in places like BC are fed by melting ice and snow caps on mountains. So what's going to happen when those ice and snow caps are all melted.
It's not hard to find out. Just check out some of the shrinking rivers of China, and the damage that has cause to food production.
Click to expand...

Alas if we were blind tuits ... would it help erase the thoughts o' vite ... that thing bearing down on us ... explicates, derived from explicitly beyond us and why intelligence is described as out there ...? A fault only of overly emotion people in spirited sense ... thus the great schism, an Eire crack ... it follows ... as is!
 
Pontifex Geronimo 13 said:
He can't bring down Trump. He's the leak.
Click to expand...

Causes weeps in the bar elle ...

And thus lies on lies flow ... real life if you imagine different ... that could describe a virtue of out-of-here ... and thus it ghosts ... like Her-nan-do! That's bre'd ... often well consumed in communion ... essence you'll E? There the sol thingy rests ... between the dark lie NDs ...
 
Kimmio said:
Trump has offered to testify under oath about Comey. I think he should.
Click to expand...

I heard that.

Part of me thinks that would be particularly disasterous for Trump and possibly his presidency. Which is why Republicans are going to block calling him.

I mean, the guy sends his staff out to talk about the Supreme Court Challenge (on the failed Travel Bans) which have lost because Trump repeatedly calls them Travel Bans and in so doing proves that they are unconstitutional.

White House Staff know they cannot refer to restrictions as a ban and they hold the fort until Twitter in Chief decides to call it what it is not caring what anybody thinks of it, it is a Travel Ban. The man is his own worst enemy.

For him to take and oath and appear before any kind of investigation would be self-injurious and I don't think he has sufficient ability to comprehend that.

So, it would be entertaining if nothing else.

It would force Republicans to make some very difficult choices which would, no doubt, reverse their fortunes in mid-terms. Either they swallow Trumps crap and pretend there is nothing to see. Which they can pretend to do as long as Trump keeps his mouth shut (temporarily at least) or they are forced to take action which they are clearly hoping to avoid.

I also don't think swearing an oath means anything to Trump. Given the record he has for other breach of contract why wouldn't he hold anything else that compelled him to honesty in contempt?
 
revjohn said:
I heard that.

Part of me thinks that would be particularly disasterous for Trump and possibly his presidency. Which is why Republicans are going to block calling him.

I mean, the guy sends his staff out to talk about the Supreme Court Challenge (on the failed Travel Bans) which have lost because Trump repeatedly calls them Travel Bans and in so doing proves that they are unconstitutional.

White House Staff know they cannot refer to restrictions as a ban and they hold the fort until Twitter in Chief decides to call it what it is not caring what anybody thinks of it, it is a Travel Ban. The man is his own worst enemy.

For him to take and oath and appear before any kind of investigation would be self-injurious and I don't think he has sufficient ability to comprehend that.

So, it would be entertaining if nothing else.

It would force Republicans to make some very difficult choices which would, no doubt, reverse their fortunes in mid-terms. Either they swallow Trumps crap and pretend there is nothing to see. Which they can pretend to do as long as Trump keeps his mouth shut (temporarily at least) or they are forced to take action which they are clearly hoping to avoid.

I also don't think swearing an oath means anything to Trump. Given the record he has for other breach of contract why wouldn't he hold anything else that compelled him to honesty in contempt?
Click to expand...

Are you labelling this a comprehension AL challenge? Perhaps just a slipped thought ... into the unknowing ... sometimes referred to as sub con science or conscious for short!
 
Tis why oily garchs (form of fissure) despise thin king m'n as dark ... the Shadow spreads as the great I am Eric an smear ... kind've spoof? Purple thing ...
 
revjohn said:
Part of me thinks that would be particularly disasterous for Trump and possibly his presidency. Which is why Republicans are going to block calling him.
Click to expand...


He may well be deposed by Robert Mueller as part of his investigation. Mueller, as I understand it, has the authority to require that. The Republicans couldn't block that and it would be under oath.

If I'm right about Trump being a "pathological liar" (again - that's a psychological condition and not a character flaw) then he could very easily testify under oath and tell all sorts of lies while totally believing that he's telling the truth.
 
revsdd said:

He may well be deposed by Robert Mueller as part of his investigation. Mueller, as I understand it, has the authority to require that. The Republicans couldn't block that and it would be under oath.

If I'm right about Trump being a "pathological liar" (again - that's a psychological condition and not a character flaw) then he could very easily testify under oath and tell all sorts of lies while totally believing that he's telling the truth.
Click to expand...

Tis common in Greek myth ... hom moe being common as Johns (yahannah) to the Greek god essence ... that's Chi the "X" as mystery in Robert Louis Stevenson's book on buried stuffings ... thus that handling of thoughts ... isolated things in the land of real lyres ... virtue out of here ... virtu'allah dark as Mo Ham'ed in script ... fore running to King James ... he too lost it ... hybrid virtue of reality! Tis incarnate ... like psyche ... many say it is only an essence compared to existence ...

Pure semantics as seen as Seminole ... aboriginal like me thoughts ... ancient of dais ...
 
The problem is not Trump. The problem is the moral collapse of the United States. It is an empire in the oldest and ugliest sense of that word. And it cannot maintain an empire, not matter how many people it kills.
The churches could be useful here if they were to put our world into the context of Jesus' teaching. But there's not chance of that. (I don't see what Canadian planes bombing Iraq and Libya have to do with with the teaching of Jesus. I don't see what the whole idea of capitalism has to do with the teaching of Jesus. Did Jesus say somewhere there is a blessing in competing to make more money than others? When Muslims kill Christians, we are quick enough to pray for the dead. Do we pray for the Muslims we have killed in the millions? Or for the ones we are now deliberately starving to death?
The churches, evangelicals in particular, have become obsessed with getting into heaven. We can murder, starve whole countries, dreadfully abuse peoples as, for example, Canada's mining companies do - and it's okay. So long as you say you believe, you're in.
We abuse much of the world. We do much too little for our own society. We accept the dominance of the very wealthy whose Christian endeavor begins and ends with building churches named after themselves.

There are very few Christians today who run any risk of being crucified.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top