TRUMP - Some people think......... How do you feel?

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

It would likely improve the US war industry and thus improve industriousness there ... where there is little is opportunity for Moor (ups and downs as empirics vary)! The experiences of war are better when your isolated from effects ... then with great ability to push the cause ... almost religiously in some sects ... almost occult-ish!
 
yX0xaoZ.jpg


Made me laugh.
 
Is that shock, chocked or sheded persona as in the Shack when someone drifted off into the sub conscience ... a lesser tier of awareness? Mental folks adrift in an emotional dimension!
 
That won't happen. Very, very few people watch real wrestling. (It lacks audience appeal. So almost all real wrestling is amateur.) But pro wrestling has been grossly fake (and boring for a viewer with at least an average IQ) since the 1920s. So if Trump went into a wrestling match, you can bet it was play acting - for a payoff.
A boxing ring would put Trump into real trouble.
 
That won't happen. Very, very few people watch real wrestling. (It lacks audience appeal. So almost all real wrestling is amateur.) But pro wrestling has been grossly fake (and boring for a viewer with at least an average IQ) since the 1920s. So if Trump went into a wrestling match, you can bet it was play acting - for a payoff.
A boxing ring would put Trump into real trouble.

Jacob started it in a dream about entertaining the hosts of onlookers ... shadower's of the doings in dark and abstract sense?

Can cause crisis in the mental organ ... thus orgiastic and mind blow'n activity ... wind rift?
 
This is a great resource for following the Trump investigation timeline:

https://www.reddit.com/r/TrumpInvestigation/wiki/doc

Trump will have an answer ... goes something like: "someone else owns the responsibility, because they won't do it my way!"

Does his way lead to ends? ... one of the forms of ethics ... off the Wahl! Tis the God syndrome like ra Ha bitualation on the other side?

The tarry remnant of the past bitched into the earth .. in due time coming up as something of kohl, minor dot here ... a pot of where we hear: God give me a song to sing ... preferably a sad song as I look at our aggregate conscience ... nothing to it!

Or it amounts to nothing but a hill of beans ... lentil then and after OEster the ham goes on ... Pi soup as an irrational stir ... a sign of doings past ... something uprising from the mire dirt ... awesome !

The word said there would be a mysterious sign ... thus the pop up motive Asians Moe ... that gig I'D hurl ... that she conceived ... and poppe doubt! If you know a great deal of the aggregate possibilities of the scattered icons ...

Nun' say ... the boots keep walking ... verily Katty I's aye ... the doings continue to be Dunne ... a strange film! But with addition of C'est Fini an end and something to ponder for a long time about what it really meant to all the Johns ... common people being screwd by oligarchs ... whatever sects they belong to ... the shaft and the rod cometh!

Purple a' haze I awe because by example truth can't be told of imaginary things ... we just don't know where the abstracts are at ... or where we are going ... so it ain;t done yet ... the judge ponders eternally over mortals ... they're strange ...

When logos and logic departs there's nothing left but the love ... that nothing that will kill yah if'n there's no break of riff in tuit!
 
Reddit and quest ova EAns ... humanity can't tell truth, or extract a virtue ... they don't even question anything further everything "the ALL" of it must be augur'd ... the great carpenter Joe's eph as the dream maker providing to see out of the forest ... one tree at a time knotty laid-ease the stand-up form ... shadows to Plato ... an eternal Job ... learning Beta ... that second one ... together a deuce, or another Dei? De isis on the cake ... choch'n well rounded out as mother earth! Confusing men on all 4 corners ... thus earthy chaos ... go fig Ur ... Figaro!
 
Sure, because if you can't trust a wiki document by an anonymous person on reddit, what can you trust. :D
In spite of "wiki" appearing in the address, this isn't really a "wiki document." It's a thread linking to a wide variety of sources (from CNN to the Japan Times to the Moscow Times to Newsweek to the Wall Street Journal to the Daily Mail, and including Trump's own tweets, etc., etc.) giving information on the Trump investigation.
 
In spite of "wiki" appearing in the address, this isn't really a "wiki document." It's a thread linking to a wide variety of sources (from CNN to the Japan Times to the Moscow Times to Newsweek to the Wall Street Journal to the Daily Mail, and including Trump's own tweets, etc., etc.) giving information on the Trump investigation.


One has to put some Q'loos together out of the cesspool we live in false, false truths as double negative make positives ... lesser calculations to come up with any kind of product, proto typical sol ... evolves out of may .. when the husk blows? Nothing left but a thought .. can you believe the non-existence of such gossamer connections ?

Reading A N Whitehead ... as a mathematician he uses a profusion of negatives to make a point out of how something was made out of nothing without a deuce ... opposing pairs! With mellowing the little girl next door is blossoming ... but yea ... I'm to mellowed to do any thing other than aspire about the creative nonsense ... except on medium ... paper or cyber domains?
Once you get by the papa Ruse it is all satirical ... Justas a rub to wake sensations beyond the penne; the first five has a six'th? Then you observe thas Even not primed as it goes on the 8'n the process in ova ... thus agatheos ... an old Greek process (OEstr-ess) if you can gather some scattered commentary on the nature of God ... that's the WORD in antes (antique) form! Plato's head ache?

Had a minister tell me over dinner the other night that his great grandfather referred to his spouse as "relic" something gathered by beach combers ... explaining activity of Beeches ... if you can catch the hidden tree of logos, logic and all that buried in a fog of opinion, irrationalities and other under lying facts ... warped science in de light of what you can do with words sometimes considered rules when only roués ... like J'roue Salem ... the head of the heart ... it drives one into chaos ... from whence one has to gather some choice chits (archaic form of) bits and bites coming in quirk s and quarks of humanity and in human activities? Sadisms ... leading authors to compose sad songs to sing ... Jesus gives me a song ... few wish to understand ... as they believe it a golden ass that would love his siblings ... its just not in the present dark game ...

My daughter the biologist tells me aspens and beeches are often all one tree in a grove .. as a nature of ryzhomes ... but some studies deny the nature of nature and thus nature appears to be put down in some high imaginations ... abstracts?

Ever encounter a grove of bitching ... that happens with put down of flighty seed ... a casting performed by Jah Zus knows ... Hoos?
 
Last edited:
In spite of "wiki" appearing in the address, this isn't really a "wiki document." It's a thread linking to a wide variety of sources (from CNN to the Japan Times to the Moscow Times to Newsweek to the Wall Street Journal to the Daily Mail, and including Trump's own tweets, etc., etc.) giving information on the Trump investigation.

In fact it is a wiki document - a wiki document which, as you say, links to other sources.
 
In fact it is a wiki document - a wiki document which, as you say, links to other sources.
Yes, but what I'm saying is that the term "wiki document" often gets used pejoratively or sarcastically to suggest that a source isn't credible. An example of that is someone who wrote that "... if you can't trust a wiki document by an anonymous person on reddit, what can you trust." So when I say that "this isn't really a wiki document" what I mean is that it's more than what it sounds like, given the way "wiki documents" are often dismissed.
 
"Wiki" is simply crowd-sourced information. Only as good or as bad as the underlying information. I don't know about you, but often, before reading an article, I'll scroll to the bottom and check out the bibliography. A bunch of links to Breitbart articles would be a tip-off to serious amounts of bulls**t, for instance.
 
"Wiki" is simply crowd-sourced information. Only as good or as bad as the underlying information. I don't know about you, but often, before reading an article, I'll scroll to the bottom and check out the bibliography. A bunch of links to Breitbart articles would be a tip-off to serious amounts of bulls**t, for instance.

Then there are serious bibliographies ... for those reading foreign intelligence ... instead of common opinion! Dialexit ... and your out of here to view from a recessive condition ... like Moses when encountering God ... as strange word on the pile (mount)!

The far ankh ... angst .. and thus we are jerked around ... like so much beef that the oligarch can't accept as little supports ... hammer OI-dz, or AE-dz to the rodding and poking to see it there is anything or value in reality stories ...? Is that satyr 's on a stick as an old cooked goat to answer for the activity about Little Lam's Tories stickler's if myths and folk lure in not understood as beit'n ...
 
Yes, but what I'm saying is that the term "wiki document" often gets used pejoratively or sarcastically to suggest that a source isn't credible. An example of that is someone who wrote that "... if you can't trust a wiki document by an anonymous person on reddit, what can you trust." So when I say that "this isn't really a wiki document" what I mean is that it's more than what it sounds like, given the way "wiki documents" are often dismissed.

First you say that it isn't a wiki document... now you admit that it is... fascinating. :D

At any rate, in seeing how legit it is, the next thing to do would be checking out all its sources, and how well the wiki document summarizes or quotes from them.
 
Let's say Trump gets nailed with unquestionable evidence, and so is impeached. Let's say a Republican or a Democrat replaces him. Will that make the slightest difference in U.S. military aggression? Will it in any way reduce the power of the very wealthy to control government? Will it do anything to stop the transfer of wealth to the very rich?
It's pointless to focus on Trump.
 
Back
Top