TRUMP - Some people think......... How do you feel?

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Register Log in
Jae said:
No. I'm stating that it's possible to redeem Creation without over regulating businesses.
Click to expand...
Just now it is business that regulates us. Whatever our profession we are all subordinate to the law of money.

Those who endorse and bless capitalism in the name of God revealed in Jesus Christ by the Holy Spirit are in for a rude awakening.

Trump or Clinton makes no difference. The structures of capitalism will press arrogantly forward until the appointed day. Blessed are those who turn from the multiplicity of ways to prefer one way. This is the way of human being at home in the natural order; creature in creation.

We are called to vacate the ideologies of liberal democracy under the sign of globalizing capital as Israel was called to vacate the oppressive Egyptian economy.

George
 
revsdd said:
I'm still working on how calling Clinton a "crooked old hag" fits your stated goal of seeing both candidates as children of God and seeing the good in them. "Crooked" is perhaps arguable, but "old hag" seems merely pejorative and not in keeping with your stated plan.

Anyway, going with your post and applying it to both candidates the choice is between

(1) a crooked old hag and

(2) an even older guy who's promoted xenophobia and racism and violence, who has criticized former prisoners of war and attacked a family who lost a son on active combat duty, who has revelled in his ability to avoid paying taxes, who has admitted committing sexual assualt and is now trying to bully into silence women who have come forward to confirm that he did what he said he did, who has threatened to ban an entire religion from entering the US, who has presided over several bankruptcies, who has verbally attacked several women, who has openly mused about using nuclear weapons and encouraged other countries to build their own nuclear weapons, who has openly admired Vladimir Putin and encouraged Russia to hack into the Democratic Party's emails.

I think both parties could and should have done better, but ... well ... that's the choice.
Click to expand...

But you're neutral, right revsdd? No. You're bias is showing... again.

"Crooked old hag" is an apt descriptor for Hillary Clinton.

"Crooked" is easy to know about. It's all over the news these days. Both she and her family's foundation - crooked.

"old" - She's 69. That's old enough to be counted as old imho.

"hag" - She's a homely, malicious woman.

As for seeing the imago Dei in her, I continue to believe that it's important to see that in everyone. I have tried to see it in her, I really have, and I have failed. Probably the fault lies within me, I've admitted on WC2 to being a broken person, but I have yet to see the imago Dei in Clinton. At this point I honestly can't think of a kind word to say on her behalf. I believe she has done great wrong, and I pray that she will be brought to justice.
 
Jae said:
But you're neutral, right revsdd? No. You're bias is showing... again.

"Crooked old hag" is an apt descriptor for Hillary Clinton.

"Crooked" is easy to know about. It's all over the news these days. Both she and her family's foundation - crooked.

"old" - She's 69. That's old enough to be counted as old imho.

"hag" - She's a homely, malicious woman.

As for seeing the imago Dei in her, I continue to believe that it's important to see that in everyone. I have tried to see it in her, I really have, and I have failed. Probably the fault lies within me, I've admitted on WC2 to being a broken person, but I have yet to see the imago Dei in Clinton. At this point I honestly can't think of a kind word to say on her behalf. I believe she has done great wrong, and I pray that she will be brought to justice.
Click to expand...
Unfortunately, this is typical of what a Trump supporter sounds like.
 
Jae said:
But you're neutral, right revsdd? No. You're bias is showing... again.

"Crooked old hag" is an apt descriptor for Hillary Clinton.

"Crooked" is easy to know about. It's all over the news these days. Both she and her family's foundation - crooked.

"old" - She's 69. That's old enough to be counted as old imho.

"hag" - She's a homely, malicious woman.

As for seeing the imago Dei in her, I continue to believe that it's important to see that in everyone. I have tried to see it in her, I really have, and I have failed. Probably the fault lies within me, I've admitted on WC2 to being a broken person, but I have yet to see the imago Dei in Clinton. At this point I honestly can't think of a kind word to say on her behalf. I believe she has done great wrong, and I pray that she will be brought to justice.
Click to expand...

Actually, Jae, I've never used the word neutral to describe myself. I've said that I think they're both bad candidates and that I don't know who I'd vote for - quite possibly a third party candidate if I had a vote. I think it's sad that in a country of 320 million people, these two are the best they could come up with, and I'm not surprised that a poll I saw tonight suggested that 82% of Americans have been "disgusted" with this campaign. But I have to say - Donald Trump is a particularly despicable candidate (very likely the worst major party candidate for president in American history) and Hillary Clinton's use of the word "deplorables" to describe at least some of his supporters seems an apt one to me. Too bad she said she regretted using it. It was one of the few truly honest moments of the campaign.
 
Jae said:
But you're neutral, right revsdd? No. You're bias is showing... again.

"Crooked old hag" is an apt descriptor for Hillary Clinton.

"Crooked" is easy to know about. It's all over the news these days. Both she and her family's foundation - crooked.

"old" - She's 69. That's old enough to be counted as old imho.

"hag" - She's a homely, malicious woman.

How does that fit in with your Christian morals, @Jae?
Click to expand...
 
revsdd said:
Actually, Jae, I've never used the word neutral to describe myself. I've said that I think they're both bad candidates and that I don't know who I'd vote for - quite possibly a third party candidate if I had a vote. I think it's sad that in a country of 320 million people, these two are the best they could come up with, and I'm not surprised that a poll I saw tonight suggested that 82% of Americans have been "disgusted" with this campaign. But I have to say - Donald Trump is a particularly despicable candidate (very likely the worst major party candidate for president in American history) and Hillary Clinton's use of the word "deplorables" to describe at least some of his supporters seems an apt one to me. Too bad she said she regretted using it. It was one of the few truly honest moments of the campaign.
Click to expand...

Trump is particularly despicable you say... and yet the FBI investigations continue to swirl about Clinton.
 
Jae said:
Trump is particularly despicable you say... and yet the FBI investigations continue to swirl about Clinton.
Click to expand...

Trump is particularly despicable I say. Yes. Absolutely. Clinton was careless with emails. Trump has - well, read what I wrote above.

And isn't it convenient that a Republican - who happens to be head of the FBI - decides to make an issue of this a couple of weeks before an election, with even former Republican officials like former Bush Attorney General Alberto Gonzales saying his actions were improper. Joe Walsh - the former Republican congressman who said Americans should grab their muskets if Clinton wins - tweeted that Comey was wrong to do this. Newt Gingrich - a Trump supporter - has criticized Comey. Senator Chuck Grassley (Republican from Iowa and chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee) has said that Comey's actions are unfair to Clinton, to Congress and to the country. George Terwilleger - deputy attorney general under Bush - said Comey was wrong. John Dean - White House counsel under Richard Nixon - said Comey was wrong. Larry Thompson is another former deputy attorney general under Bush who said - Comey was wrong. Karl Rove has come out against Comey. And the list goes on.

It's very possible according to many experts (including Republicans) that Comey is the one who broke the law by blatantly interfering in an election campaign even though he has no evidence of wrongdoing on Clinton's part. At the very least he's tarnished the FBI by making it look like a partisan tool trying to help out the despicable Donald Trump.
 
Third man Theme evolves as a corruption due to the greater corruption of the present duo?

Could this cure the deuce' d thing in US polity ... extreme conspiracy roués ... on this side of virtue ... that's reality ... the balance of the well-rounded is out there ... abstract (i.e. imaginary #'s)?

Thus we work ourselves to 6's and Cepheid (7) as an icon leading to getting dressed out to the neins --- Eveitas Conspiracy on don't keep your distance when grasping ... especially regarding the unknown ... tis a gross space !
 
Jae said:
American Muslims standing strongly in support of Donald J. Trump...

Click to expand...
90 per cent of non muslims make up the terrorist list for the United States. Why are muslims in America even an issue for Donald Trump or any candidate for that matter? The issue should be addressing crime in the United States and gun control.
 
Waterfall said:
90 per cent of non muslims make up the terrorist list for the United States. Why are muslims in America even an issue for Donald Trump or any candidate for that matter? The issue should be addressing crime in the United States and gun control.
Click to expand...

The crooked old hag and her mainstream media have tried to make it seem like Trump hates Muslims. Maybe you should ask yourself as a Clinton-supporter why it's supposed to be an issue.
 
Problem is, the mouldy-wig-wearing ancient fart is on record as stating that he wishes to deport all Muslims; if that doesn't come across as hatred on the part of the groping old imbecile, I don't know what does.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top