Wondercafe2 Election Night Special 2016

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Register Log in
Jae said:
My guess is that if Clinton wins (which is probable), Trump and his supporters will protest in some way.
Click to expand...


Sounds like church ... the men rant and psyche and Sophie are gentle and quiet ... just observing how opinionated their men folk are. Just silent old haggis ...or haggid as the shuffling of "s" and "ð" sometimes occurs in emotional chaos ... a'm'n thingy! Honour thy mother folk ... the big, little, skinny and fhat! (as chi puts a lid on it in church).

Thus they wend own ... and the rest is history! To interpret such chaos ... one may require to know several tongues ... 2 - 3 according to the Acts as presented ... interpretations may vary and thus requires some compromise unlike business and polity (pure extremism)! There some women begin to act unmindful and noisy ... as god speaks in the tongues of men and thinks like a broad-based sill ... wide foundations?

The function of the gaps is varied too ...
 
Last edited:
Jae said:
My guess is that if Clinton wins (which is probable), Trump and his supporters will protest in some way.
Click to expand...

It depends how badly she wins. If she has a big, clear margin, they will look like asses if they do more than grumble. If it is a wire-thin margin, then I fully expect to hear a tirade about rigged elections and court challenges (and maybe the latter will even happen, though I don't that's certain).

Now, if Trump happens to win, I imagine Clinton will concede gracefully but if it is very close and there is any sign his supporters have been playing vigilante poll protector, then maybe some kind of protest or challenge.
 
Mendalla said:
It depends how badly she wins. If she has a big, clear margin, they will look like asses if they do more than grumble. If it is a wire-thin margin, then I fully expect to hear a tirade about rigged elections and court challenges (and maybe the latter will even happen, though I don't that's certain).

Now, if Trump happens to win, I imagine Clinton will concede gracefully but if it is very close and there is any sign his supporters have been playing vigilante poll protector, then maybe some kind of protest or challenge.
Click to expand...

I don't think it will be a, "tirade." Trump has a responsibility to the movement that's formed around him to act if he feels that the election's unfair.
 
revsdd said:
Trump's campaign has already filed a lawsuit in Nevada over alleged voting irregularities.
Click to expand...
At least one voting station stayed open past the posted closing. That said, the voting station is supposed to stay open until everyone who arrived in line on time is allowed to vote. That's a requirement.

The "irregularity" they are worried about is that people were not prevented from voting because of a long line.

When too many people who have valid identification are allowed to vote is a problem for you, you have issues.
 
Nevada's Republican Party chairman, Michael McDonald, told a Trump audience in Reno on Saturday that polling locations were kept open late so that a "certain group" could vote.

"Last night, in Clark County, they kept a poll open 'til 10 o'clock at night so a certain group could vote," McDonald said in introductory remarks at a Trump rally. "The polls are supposed to close at 7. This was kept open until 10. Yeah, you feel free right now? You think this is a free and easy election? That's why it's important."

Clark County, which includes the suburbs of Las Vegas, has a large Hispanic population and could figure prominently in who wins the White House.
Click to expand...

CwwpqjuVQAA23wL.jpg:large


Aaaand, Trump's motion to separate the ballots that were cast after the official close was just predictably denied:
https://twitter.com/kurteichenwald/status/796078477401321474

The concern now is that Trump will launch multiple bogus motions that have no standing, just so he can point to their dismissals as "evidence" that the election is rigged.

The best line about this I've read is that you just can't trust riggers.
 
One of those motions just got shut down, fairly quickly, by a Nevada judge.
 
It'll be interesting to see how much damage Trump has done to down ballot races. Fasten your seat belt, folks, here we go....
 
Jeeze ... no chance of something Nous this quick ... even from a feisty mind prone to vehemence !

That'd be a passionate tongue with a large hol'lo behind it ... causing a ringing in all within range! Reciprocal ego?
 
BetteTheRed said:
I think people have forgotten that things usually die more with a whimper than a bang.

The coming of peace will be noticed in the rear-view mirror of history. "s**t, no-one's killed anyone in a month."
Click to expand...


There are those almost dead from the US Sniping ... needs a bird g'un-wild ... something to distract the killers ...
 
BetteTheRed said:
I think people have forgotten that things usually die more with a whimper than a bang.

The coming of peace will be noticed in the rear-view mirror of history. "s**t, no-one's killed anyone in a month."
Click to expand...

Peace? My feeling is that it depends on who gets elected. Trump will bring about peace. I believe WWIII will occur under the presidency of Clinton.
 
And what might WW3 look like?

I'm not disagreeing with Graeme's pessimistic view of the future of western-type democracy, but I'm not sure who'd really disagree enough with whom to go to anything like a "world" war. I foresee lots (more) people murdered in drone type events in unstable parts of the world; I see no "world" appetite for conventional "us against them" war.

I mean, Drumpf seems to, realistically, like that silly little man in Russia, and the Chinese are too pragmatic to war, and Hilary has no taste for official war, so from where, between where, how?

I wish you'd spend a bit of time thinking about the crap you post, jae.
 
BetteTheRed said:
And what might WW3 look like?

I'm not disagreeing with Graeme's pessimistic view of the future of western-type democracy, but I'm not sure who'd really disagree enough with whom to go to anything like a "world" war. I foresee lots (more) people murdered in drone type events in unstable parts of the world; I see no "world" appetite for conventional "us against them" war.

I mean, Drumpf seems to, realistically, like that silly little man in Russia, and the Chinese are too pragmatic to war, and Hilary has no taste for official war, so from where, between where, how?

I wish you'd spend a bit of time thinking about the crap you post, jae.
Click to expand...

Seems Russia's getting prepared Bette. http://truthfeed.com/if-hillary-clinton-wins-its-war-vladimir-putin/29667/
 
#CBCNewsworld just reported @realDonaldTrump as saying that if he doesn't win, running was a waste of time. :D
 
Jae said:
Peace? My feeling is that it depends on who gets elected. Trump will bring about peace. I believe WWIII will occur under the presidency of Clinton.
Click to expand...

Please explain. Intelligently.

To quote Bette:

BetteTheRed said:
I wish you'd spend a bit of time thinking about the crap you post, jae.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top