![]()
PilgrimsProgress
FROM THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (NEJM)
Comes this excellent review of Norman Cousins' great book, HEAD FIRST, The Biology of HOPE. I have always said that the real title of this book should be
SPIRIT (PNEUMA) FIRST, The Biology of FAITH, HOPE & LOVE
Reading this book is what influenced me to scrap the word 'hypnotherapy' and replace it with the neo-logism, PNEUMA-therapy.
Here is the link to the review http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199004263221720
Head First: The biology of hope
By Norman Cousins. 368 pp. New York, E.P. Dutton, 1989. $19.95.
Norman Cousins' new book continues the story of the "obsession" he first reported in Anatomy of an Illness (New York: W.W. Norton, 1979): to demonstrate that emotion and mood affect biology directly. Cousins has set out to influence physicians, encouraging them to "put to work all the resources of spirit that can be translated into beneficial biochemical changes." The book interweaves many themes: Cousins' new career as adjunct professor at the UCLA School of Medicine, after 31 years spent as editor of the Saturday Review; his commitment to honoring individual experience while subjecting it to scientific scrutiny; his study of patients with melanoma; an account of the hypnotist, Franz Anton Mesmer; a study of the placebo effect; and Cousins' survey of images of the physician in literature. Perhaps the most suggestive aspect of the book is the scientific grounding it provides for the traditional values of the physician.
Cousins constantly attempts to bridge the cultures of journalism and medicine, aware that medically trained readers, schooled "to shun conclusions based on single experiences and to look for evidence based on numbers of cases," may prefer reasoning that moves "from the general to the particular" to the anecdotal method Cousins employs. "Writers seek out anecdotes as a way of making larger statements," he points out. "They tend to shun statistics, [which] obscure souls. If nothing is real to medical researchers except as it happens to a significant number of people, nothing is real to a writer save as it happens to a single person." This comfortable view begs the question, Can a single outcome define prudent policy for the many? What about the many head-first right-thinkers who go straight on to painful death? Possibly they die happier — but do they? Beware. To answer that question demands numbers — more than a single case.
Thus LGK ... would you say that OE Sus or Jesus is a scattered light ... a somewhat fractal or abstract image that is buried in real light or otherwise the sublime shadow? Pure hype to many who can't get below the emotional horizon?
I liked A Noe's book Out of our Heads as a hint of a multi etude nous variance from the one-way theme a step towards wakening us to eternal cognizance? Some say they experience this in a NDE, OBI or hypo nautical trip in the dark pool. Scott Peck claimed it a dangerous pilgrimage and one should go there with much assistance of you could end up disrupted or in chaos ... that's like it appears ... a temporary or temporal thing!
Now in the institutions in the east there is great hesitation and inhibition about studies of such things and they are very conservative about things that are not solidly institutionalized ... even if in Eire ...
Thanks for the hint on another book on what many consider mythical or out of the physical head containment. Sometimes one has to be sublime to get round the philosopher's stone ...
I'll take the plunge ... an immersion into the saliently isolated metaphors? They are outstanding but remain unseen ... code-X ... the unknown!