What Legacy Does Trump Leave?

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Register Log in
Recall there are winners involved ... and lost souls ...

If one is a winner; does he need to do all that is needed, aggressively, to win ... like lying, cheating, dispossessing and killing?

Is winning righteous in this perspective leaving the counter point ire 'd?

Are there alternate types of Christians that are below the winner's circle ... like in a horse race making Christianity into competition rather than ... well you know ... collaboration and agreement? That would likely be offensive to a bulk ... thus some depart the mass as essence ... like fire in the nose Arche.

So the discussion converts ... to someone up against the stone Wahl ... expect purple shades ... roué 'al? Like nightfall and violet sparkers ...
 
Waterfall said:
Yes I know, but we just disagree about Mystic way of posting...which is okay.
Click to expand...

I agree. In fact I believe being able to disagree respectfully is a good thing. I have zero tolerance for name calling and labeling. I'm sure you're not surprised. :)
 
They Try and Try --but yet another Blow to the Trump derangement Syndrome Team ----

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 Friday to limit the scope of obstruction charges that prosecutors have been using against Jan. 6 defendants, including Donald Trump. Norah O'Donnell anchored CBS News' special report on the decision.

President Donald Trump just got a massive U.S. Supreme Court victory following the CNN presidential debate (hosted by Jake Tapper and Dana Bash). On the other hand, the Democrat Party is in full-panic mode after President Joe Biden’s disastrous performance. Will Biden remain the 2024 Democrat presidential nominee going forward? The Sekulow team discusses the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in the Fischer/J6 case, the debate highlights, the election polls, possible candidates to replace Biden (Vice President Kamala Harris, former presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, California Governor Gavin Newsom, and former First Lady Michelle Obama), the SCOTUS decision overturning the Chevron case, which is a big blow to the Deep State, other ACLJ news – and much more.

 
So am I correct in assuming you did not watch the debate @unsafe? I asked you simple questions and was genuinely curious what you thought. I don't want to hear what others thought. I was curious about what you thought.

Have you ever taken time to watch and listen to what trump says? Or do you merely listen to pundits so you don't have to think critically?
 
unsafe said:
They Try and Try --but yet another Blow to the Trump derangement Syndrome Team ----

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 Friday to limit the scope of obstruction charges that prosecutors have been using against Jan. 6 defendants, including Donald Trump. Norah O'Donnell anchored CBS News' special report on the decision.

President Donald Trump just got a massive U.S. Supreme Court victory following the CNN presidential debate (hosted by Jake Tapper and Dana Bash). On the other hand, the Democrat Party is in full-panic mode after President Joe Biden’s disastrous performance. Will Biden remain the 2024 Democrat presidential nominee going forward? The Sekulow team discusses the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in the Fischer/J6 case, the debate highlights, the election polls, possible candidates to replace Biden (Vice President Kamala Harris, former presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, California Governor Gavin Newsom, and former First Lady Michelle Obama), the SCOTUS decision overturning the Chevron case, which is a big blow to the Deep State, other ACLJ news – and much more.

Click to expand...
Nancy Pelosi did not have to call in the troops, Trump himself has the authority to do so which is written within the Insurrection Act.
 
Waterfall said:
Nancy Pelosi did not have to call in the troops, Trump himself has the authority to do so which is written within the Insurrection Act.
Click to expand...

She not only didn't approve, she couldn't. It wasn't one of her powers.

I'm agreeing with you and highlighting that.
 
Since @unsafe believes that asking about the debate in the US Election Stuff thread is off topic, I'll ask here.

Unsafe, did you watch the debate?
 
How can a US election debate be off topic in a US election thread??? :unsure: Seems to me to be exactly what that thread is for. :giggle:
 
Mendalla said:
How can a US election debate be off topic in a US election thread??? :unsure: Seems to me to be exactly what that thread is for. :giggle:
Click to expand...

That's what I thought. Apparently unsafe would rather hurl insults than actually answer a simple question. That behaviour only makes her look bad and confirms for me that she is incapable of critical thinking.
 
Northwind said:
No. Just added evidence.
Click to expand...

Potentially all MS information given how little we know because of sacred sapiens ... those unseen folk ... overlooked or overseen in rough manner ...

Expect great missing factions ... deficiencies ... always something gone astray ... powers believe they all have it in hand when some have Thomas 'n doubts ... due to Gabriel and the dark matters ... ordinary folk see it is all astray ... holidays in iron ... ferrous heat?

Recall virtue is not that easy ... thus myths!
 
Yet another win for Trump -----OH MY the Dems must be furious ----- :ROFLMAO:

Supreme Court issues ruling on Trump immunity case: "Absolute win for Donald Trump"​


ABC News

If God wants trump in the White House again ----nothing will stop it -----:angel:

Try --try as they may ------
 
So you're in favour of a president who can do what they want @unsafe? That's a dictatorship or monarchy. That's not what the US founders wanted. They left a monarchy.......

Shame on you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top