What Do You See?

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Francis is a Globalist.
Globalists are convicted that this planet will be transformed into a great progressive utopia by bringing in a 'New World Order'.

I am not a Globalist.
I am convinced that the 'New World Order' will bring about the greatest tyranny that humanity has ever experienced.

God is opening the path wide to great deception ... I did not expect that!
How can you be so distrustful if the world were to find one voice?
 
How can you be so distrustful if the world were to find one voice?

A fully globalized world is not necessarily a good thing. SF is full of globalized futures where a rump government or governments are under the thumb of corporations. And a imagine a world government where a Trump or Erdogan gets power. At least with a federated system of nations holding the real power but working under an umbrella like the UN, the damage from a bad government can be contained.
 
A fully globalized world is not necessarily a good thing. SF is full of globalized futures where a rump government or governments are under the thumb of corporations. And a imagine a world government where a Trump or Erdogan gets power. At least with a federated system of nations holding the real power but working under an umbrella like the UN, the damage from a bad government can be contained.
Uhhh... yeaa, no kidding.
 
I see you deleted the video ... truth is stranger than fiction don't you find ... NWO leaders offering up mock human sacrifices at Bohemian Grove to a 40-foot owl (Moloch). Cremation of Care ... seems to be the order of the day.

was trying to find a better one , then got called away, but ya you got it
 
You can tell it's going to be a train wreck because it's about the "Illuminati" and blackbelt posted it. It's just what *kind* of train wreck will it be?

I first heard about the Illuminati through a card game of that name. Great fun but definitely makes it hard to take the thing seriously. I mean, when you're sitting around talking about the Gnomes of Zurich taking Fnord Motors from The Bavarian Illuminati, you tend to laugh more than you shudder.
 
You can tell it's going to be a train wreck because it's about the "Illuminati" and blackbelt posted it. It's just what *kind* of train wreck will it be?
Train wrecks often occur as a result of miscommunication:
On May 1, 1776, under the direction of the newly formed House of Rothschild ([along with] Wessely, Moses, Mendelssohn, and the bankers Itzig, Friedlander, and Meyer) who instigated the American Revolution to weaken Great Britain, Weishaupt founded the "Ancient Illuminated Seers of Bavaria" which became known as the "Order of the Illuminati". Weishaupt said that the name was derived from Luciferian teachings, and means, 'Holders of the Light.' In Latin, it means, the 'enlightened ones.' In layman's terms, it means 'to illuminate,' or 'to give light.' It refers to someone who is enlightened, spiritually and intellectually.
 
Francis is a Globalist.
Globalists are convicted that this planet will be transformed into a great progressive utopia by bringing in a 'New World Order'.

I am not a Globalist.
I am convinced that the 'New World Order' will bring about the greatest tyranny that humanity has ever experienced.

God is opening the path wide to great deception ... I did not expect that!
I just looked up the definition of Globalism and I see where you're coming from. Sorry, I wasn't thinking about this definition when I first read your post this afternoon. I do see, however, the world acting and thinking as one, but not on an ideology based on economics. I see our strength coming from the recognition and the respect of our differences, but any common ideology we may share must be based on goodwill towards everyone, despite our ideologies, religions, creed or our monetary status.
 
Train wrecks often occur as a result of miscommunication:
On May 1, 1776, under the direction of the newly formed House of Rothschild ([along with] Wessely, Moses, Mendelssohn, and the bankers Itzig, Friedlander, and Meyer) who instigated the American Revolution to weaken Great Britain, Weishaupt founded the "Ancient Illuminated Seers of Bavaria" which became known as the "Order of the Illuminati". Weishaupt said that the name was derived from Luciferian teachings, and means, 'Holders of the Light.' In Latin, it means, the 'enlightened ones.' In layman's terms, it means 'to illuminate,' or 'to give light.' It refers to someone who is enlightened, spiritually and intellectually.

Definitions can be detrimental if nt allowed flexibility as in rheology ... a creepy progress by the stoned ...
 
Train wrecks often occur as a result of miscommunication:
On May 1, 1776, under the direction of the newly formed House of Rothschild ([along with] Wessely, Moses, Mendelssohn, and the bankers Itzig, Friedlander, and Meyer) who instigated the American Revolution to weaken Great Britain, Weishaupt founded the "Ancient Illuminated Seers of Bavaria" which became known as the "Order of the Illuminati". Weishaupt said that the name was derived from Luciferian teachings, and means, 'Holders of the Light.' In Latin, it means, the 'enlightened ones.' In layman's terms, it means 'to illuminate,' or 'to give light.' It refers to someone who is enlightened, spiritually and intellectually.

unfortunately not everyone can see
 
I just looked up the definition of Globalism and I see where you're coming from. Sorry, I wasn't thinking about this definition when I first read your post this afternoon. I do see, however, the world acting and thinking as one, but not on an ideology based on economics. I see our strength coming from the recognition and the respect of our differences, but any common ideology we may share must be based on goodwill towards everyone, despite our ideologies, religions, creed or our monetary status.

who said it will be based solely on economics? that would not be total
 
GordW ----your quote to airclean33 ----...I mean there are multiple authors (all of whom may well have been inspired by their experience of God). ANd so there are multiple, and not always consistent, versions of stories and events.

This is my view on your comment -----

You have every right to believe as you like but as far as interpretation of scriptures go without the Holy Spirit all are interpreting scripture through the natural mans lens ----their own intellect -----Scripture needs a Spiritual lens to see clearly what scripture is actually saying and to provide the true meaning ------and that lens is the Holy Spirit ------

The Holy Spirit As Teacher
1Corinthians 2:14 ------Twentieth Century New Testament

The merely intellectual man rejects the teaching of the Spirit of God; for to him it is mere folly; he cannot grasp it, because it is to be understood only by spiritual insight.

This is your own interpretation GordW in my opinion -----True there are multiple authors who wrote God's word -----but this statement you make is not true according to scripture ------all of whom may well have been inspired by their experience of God).-so are you making up your own ideas about how the scripture got written down in my view ----your interpreting scripture to suit your own thinking ------ so you are contradicting scripture GodW yourself -------cause scripture says in plain clear English -----in 2 Timothy 3:16 ---all scripture is God Breathed ----God inspired ----is inspired by Godθεόπνευστοςtheopneustos2315God-breathed, i.e. inspired by God from theos and pneó--http://biblehub.com/lexicon/2_timothy/3-16.htm---- --------

This is what God says about His word ---John 17:17 KJV--thy word is truth. ---so you say you interpret scripture different than I do ------well just how many ways can you interpret this scripture -----you don't have to be a rocket scientist or have a degree in theology to figure out what 4 simple words says ------the trick is to Believe it ------Truth here means ------Definition:truth, but not merely truth as spoken;---divine truth revealed to man, straight forwardness.

So again ----Belief is everything ----confusion of what Scripture is saying comes from Not having the Holy Spirit ------and scripture states this very plainly as well 1 Corinthians 14:33 KJV 33 For God is not the author of confusion,-----but then you state that there are two different accounts about the Flood ----- But is there really ?????? ----Just maybe they are connected when we view them with the right lens in-- place ----could that not be -------

All Ministers preaching the Gospel of Jesus Christ should have the Holy Spirit indwelling in them -----that should be mandatory as it should be for all who teach ministers to be ministers in my opinion ---- If the Minister does not believe in the indwelling of the Holy Spirit to preach God's word he should not be allowed to preach in my opinion -----as they are preaching another Gospel ---their own ---- not the one Directed by God ------



Seeing and Understanding God's side through the right lens -----


 
With multiple perspectives and experiences of mortals with the eternal ... why so many closed sols when strange and alien stuff pops up ... Jack?

Perhaps institutional effect?
 
You have every right to believe as you like but as far as interpretation of scriptures go without the Holy Spirit all are interpreting scripture through the natural mans lens ----their own intellect -----Scripture needs a Spiritual lens to see clearly what scripture is actually saying and to provide the true meaning ------and that lens is the Holy Spirit ------

(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)
 
Interestingly enough, though, the "correct" lens leads one to believe exactly as do blackbelt and unsafe. What if you two disagree on something? Who has the "wrong" lens in that case?
 
Back
Top