United With God

[Luce NDs]

The young Earth creationists I know see science and the Genesis accounts as different explanations as to the origin of things. They then say that where the explanations disagree, the accounts are correct and science is in error. They do not, however, conflate science with the accounts.

Do explanations X-Pan'd on the metaphor that is devils advocate to those believing satyrs are bad ... when they stretch the abstract side of the reflection as allegory?

 

[Luce NDs]

I read once that a young Earth could have just as likely have occurred because God can do anything. Seemed like a pretty frail argument to me.

So what does "conflate science with the accounts" actually mean? They, the young Earth creationists you know, do not combine science with the experience? Does this mean observation of the natural world leads to error?

Thus the dirt do fall-eth ... and the mire fractures, a fissure ... men can believe such far out entanglements of strange particulars that are ineffable ... womb-sh?

 

[Jaebius]

So what does "conflate science with the accounts" actually mean? They, the young Earth creationists you know, do not combine science with the experience? Does this mean observation of the natural world leads to error?

Thought I explained this fairly well Neo. Perhaps not. Let me try again.

They see the Genesis accounts of the Creation as being one explanation for the origin of things.

They see science as giving another explanation for the origin of things.

They say that whenever the Genesis accounts and science are in contradiction, the accounts are correct.

They do not say that the Genesis accounts give the scientific explanation for the origin of things.

 

[Luce NDs]

Metaphorical entanglements just to challenge the thinking and separate understanding from the hid e o'us?

 

[dreamerman]

Thought I explained this fairly well Neo. Perhaps not. Let me try again.

They see the Genesis accounts of the Creation as being one explanation for the origin of things.

They see science as giving another explanation for the origin of things.

They say that whenever the Genesis accounts and science are in contradiction, the accounts are correct.

They do not say that the Genesis accounts give the scientific explanation for the origin of things.

Sounds like semantics to me.

 

[Luce NDs]

Semite: an icon of things poorly defined ... then there is the iconoclast as one who would destroy the previous and primal affection!

 

[Neo]

Thought I explained this fairly well Neo. Perhaps not. Let me try again.

They see the Genesis accounts of the Creation as being one explanation for the origin of things.

They see science as giving another explanation for the origin of things.

They say that whenever the Genesis accounts and science are in contradiction, the accounts are correct.

They do not say that the Genesis accounts give the scientific explanation for the origin of things.

So they say whenever science contradicts what the Bible says then the Bible must be correct. It sounds like "they" have left their brains at the door.

What do "you" say about this? Do you believe that the Universe, and everything within the Universe, was created in six 24 hour days?

 

[Jaebius]

So they say whenever science contradicts what the Bible says then the Bible must be correct. It sounds like "they" have left their brains at the door.

What do "you" say about this? Do you believe that the Universe, and everything within the Universe, was created in six 24 hour days?

What is a day? To God a thousand years is like a day.

 

[Neo]

What is a day? To God a thousand years is like a day.

ok... do you believe that the Universe, and everything within the Universe, was created in six thousand years?

 

[Jaebius]

ok... do you believe that the Universe, and everything within the Universe, was created in six thousand years?

Not a literal six thousand years.

 

[Neo]

A metaphorical six thousand years?

 

[Jaebius]

A metaphorical six thousand years?

A long period of time. Indeed, I would say that God continues to create things to this day.

 

[Neo]

A long period of time. Indeed, I would say that God continues to create things to this day.

So you're not a young-earth creationist?

 

[GeoFee]

Truth= Science? Religion?

Light= Particle? Wave?

 

[Waterfall]

Darkness=ignorance

 

[paradox3]

A metaphorical six thousand years?

Or a mythological six thousand years?

 

[revsdd]

Or a mythological six thousand years?

Or a mythological and metaphorical six thousand years that also serves as an excellent analogy.

 

[Neo]

It's in all likelihood that the "Days of Genesis" were fashioned from the Hindu "Days of Brahma".

 

[Luce NDs]

What is a day? To God a thousand years is like a day.

You're beginning to sound like an indeterminate ... imaginary #!

 

[Luce NDs]

It's in all likelihood that the "Days of Genesis" were fashioned from the Hindu "Days of Brahma".

You mean with a good bit of Taurus? Golden bouel ... bow elle? Perhaps fore castle as ante mound!