TRUMP - Some people think......... How do you feel?

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Register Log in
Goes like as wiz Jinn-ism? The spirit of doing what's desired w/o clues ... these swell in heated arid arias ... on the steppes?

In Georgia it happened while swinging on the porche ... in NFLD it is known as a stoop for how things go down there ...
 
Blackbelt, the memo is written by the GOP, to bolster their argument. There is another memo from the Democrats with more info which would complete the picture, but they won't consider releasing that.

Also, the FISA warrant wasn't signed by Rosenstein - he just applied for a continuation of an existing FISA warrant for surveillance on Carter Page, who is profoundly stupid. Rosenstein can not approve such a warrant, and a warrant was already in place. A judge approved the warrant. Rosenstein did agree with the request for the continuation, and a judge approved it.

This bit is being left out to make Rosenstein look biased and set up his firing. Which will set up the removal of Mueller.

Your hero here is a shill, and he uses part truths to make things look obvious, when they are anything but. Every little thing the Democrats or their supporters do wrong is magnified and played for your enjoyment. Everything the GOP or the administration does is downplayed or ignored. Plus, even if I agreed with him, he is f***ing annoying. How do you listen to this crap?

You are, once again, being completely played. There is more to this than you are receiving in your echo chamber. I know you think everything I say is wrong because I'm an atheist, but listen to others around here. You are being used. The people using you are trying to convince you that everyone else is being used. It's projection. They bolster lies and omissions with part truths or mistakes in order to make you mad at who you already suspected were the bad guys, and it's working.
 
"who is profoundly stupid"


Is this probable in a realm dedicated to emotional reposes? Tis overlooked by a searing prickle ...
 
chansen said:
Blackbelt, the memo is written by the GOP, to bolster their argument. There is another memo from the Democrats with more info which would complete the picture, but they won't consider releasing that.
Click to expand...

I mentioned the memo upthread in post 7508 when I said,

revjohn said:
That memo which many want declassified is running into a snag as there is concern that the memo be declassified without the source material it quotes also being declassified. That seems fair since the memo at best interprets other documents. Everyone should be allowed to see the source material so they can draw their own conclusions.
Click to expand...

Since the vote went along party lines it seems that all that was released was the memo written by Nunes which references source material that is still conveniently classified.

At this point the memo makes a claim and refuses to provide the actual proof for the claim.

It is a partisan attack on the Special Counsel investigating the Trump/Russia Collusion event at worst and a smoke screen at best.

The President said he wanted to meet with the Special Prosecutor and would testify under oath (a redundancy that only impressed folk who were not aware that any information passed on to the FBI proven to be untruthful is already subject to penalties under law). Of course only if his lawyers would allow it. His lawyers responded by saying, in essence, "Like hell you will."

Which is something lawyers are prone to say to clients whose mouth moves faster than their brains can think.

Sort of like when Trump was asked almost a year ago about why he fired Comey and he responded,

Donald Trump said:
When I decided to do it I said to myself, I said you know this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made up story its an excuse by the Democrats for having lost an election.
Click to expand...

So, Trump talking to himself about himself comes to the conclusion that he is going to fire Comey and it doesn't matter because there is nothing to the notion that the Trump campaign or Trump himself colluded with Russia.

Which is great but not really his purview. Not to mention it conflicts with the fact that initially nobody on the Trump Campaign team admitted to meeting any Russian nationals until confronted with transcripts of intercepted conversations had with known Russian nationals who were identified as spies. Flynn fired for allegedly lying to Pence about not having met with Russians. Flynn subsequently plead guilty to lying to the FBI about contact with Russia, Manafort and Gates were charged but have elected to plead not guilty, Papadopoulos has plead guilty to lying to the FBI about contact with Russia. Sessions who had recollection problems earlier in front of Senate then admitted when shown evidence that oh yeah he met with Russians and had been in meetings where contact with Russia had been discussed. Sessions spends a day with the Special Counsel's team and apparently Trump knew nothing about that and has not talked with Sessions about it.

Genius Donnie Jr's story about meeting with Russians about adoptions was not about adopting children but dirt on Clinton.

Knowing all that I say to myself, I say, you know how Trump is always saying there was no collusion? And before I can finish the part of my brain which thinks Shakespeare is pretty brilliant says, "None profess their innocence so loudly as the guilty." Then we both go hmmm and I say to myself. You raise and interesting point.

If I was in the President's shoes and I thought that an investigation about me and my campaign team could be potentially damaging I think to myself.

What would be the most damaging?

That the truth get out or that I be seen trying to prevent the truth from getting out?

If the truth is damaging then the only way to solve that is to disarm the weapon and confess the truth.

If being seen trying to prevent the truth from getting our is more damaging then I make sure I don't do anything which can be interpreted as an attack on the process of uncovering the truth.

And, if there is no truth to collusion then the investigation will, in all likelihood, prove that to be the case.

Of course, if I am so paranoid as to believe that my enemies are with the various National Intelligence Services and that they have probably concocted a story to remove me from office I should probably do one of two things. 1) take off the tinfoil hat so that I can blend more easily in large crowds. 2) Seek Professional Help.

And on an unrelated point.

If I were the President and I was about to go into a room and say we need to be more united I'd consider whether or not that message would be best served by confessing the ways I have been dividing the country the entire year previous. Because you lead by example, not by setting a double standard.

The man may hold the office of President there is nothing about him which is Presidential and there is less about him that is manly.
 
Is this classical juws with all the ambiguous Jazzes attached ... god knows what's in their mind, love ...

Then many believe life is straight forward without warps (confusion vs infusion/diffusion) ... frenula lens may be required ... lighthouse things that may not be related to the WH Lies ...
 
Luce NDs said:
Is this classical juws with all the ambiguous Jazzes attached ... god knows what's in their mind, love ...
Click to expand...

Not really sure what you intend to communicate.

Mindful that phonetically I find the sentence worrisome.

Worried about straying into classical anti-semitism. Could you please clarify?
 
Worriesome??????/ Hebejebeas?

Then there was the directive in the bible against graven images ... the first presses being based on wood cut reliefs that were reverse images ... and allow a lot of intelligence and free press to be distributed to the people ... even Trump puts the press down ...

If you demonize anything does it grow on the common folk stories?

Semitic at one time referred to iconic stuff as signs of the time ... these pass ... forgotten as ante Semitic ... the prior stuff! Tell me again about how chaos theory can be imposed on the pagans! Anything better than the heath Ann flowers ... heather? English monarchs worried about what rose up there ... and myths just are ... iconic! They often have little real meaning attached as the heathen don't really want to know ... by previous conditioning ...
 
Last edited:
So . . .You are the New Director of the FBI, handpicked by the President and you have gone on record to oppose the memo about which you have, grave concerns about material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo’s accuracy.

How long does it take

A) Fox to report the story
B) The president to find a new hand-picked Director of the FBI
C) Republicans to suggest you are part of the "deep-State" conspiracy to undermine the current Administration.
 
How long until this guy screams about it in front of a green screen?
QPl2NQK.png
 
Should one read into it beyond the dark cracks? The hu*mist about how little the pagans (common folks) know what's going on up there in high places ... it suppresses the virtue thingy! Required rough equality ... with minor differences allowed ... the divisive lion is cloudy .. somewhat foggy kitty ... where thoughts go when displaced, denied and eliminated ... they may come back in a type of subtle flash ... cathexis allegory as bloody boul ... Tour-Os?

I can't say straight forward because of all the lateral warpage ... lines are drawn ... some Druid Seer! Possibly Sami Aryan ... with some lisps ...
 
chansen said:
It Was Worse than You Think: The House Intelligence Meeting on the Nunes Memo
Click to expand...


Thanks for sharing the link. I followed links embedded in the article to the transcripts of the House Intelligence Committee meeting and was really quite surprised at the deliberate partisan manipulation.

Without wanting to bog down a Trump thread with UCCAN practices I can say that it is our practice, no matter which court is issuing a report for the wider Church that if there be participants in the committee responsible for the report who disagree with the conclusions of the report they are permitted the opportunity to provide letters of dissent which are always included in the final report.

The biggest and most memorable examples were the report prepared for General Council in 1988 and most recently the findings of the Conference Interview Board with respect to The Reverend Vosper. The dissent, while contained to a minority of members in both cases was still respected and honoured and included in the final reports even though it was obvious that divided opinion would make the larger discussion much more difficult.

That the Majority Chair promised the minority Chair that certain motions would be permitted it was very clear from the record of discussion involved that there was no chance that the motions put forward at the request of the minority chair would receive critical reflection and fair consideration. It was partisan political theatre and it reveals bad faith action on the part of the Majority Chair.
 
revjohn said:

Thanks for sharing the link. I followed links embedded in the article to the transcripts of the House Intelligence Committee meeting and was really quite surprised at the deliberate partisan manipulation.

Without wanting to bog down a Trump thread with UCCAN practices I can say that it is our practice, no matter which court is issuing a report for the wider Church that if there be participants in the committee responsible for the report who disagree with the conclusions of the report they are permitted the opportunity to provide letters of dissent which are always included in the final report.

The biggest and most memorable examples were the report prepared for General Council in 1988 and most recently the findings of the Conference Interview Board with respect to The Reverend Vosper. The dissent, while contained to a minority of members in both cases was still respected and honoured and included in the final reports even though it was obvious that divided opinion would make the larger discussion much more difficult.

That the Majority Chair promised the minority Chair that certain motions would be permitted it was very clear from the record of discussion involved that there was no chance that the motions put forward at the request of the minority chair would receive critical reflection and fair consideration. It was partisan political theatre and it reveals bad faith action on the part of the Majority Chair.
Click to expand...

Doesn't the larger boul take over and drive further info and intelligence on the matter underground? Thus caldrons ... from where explosions occur .. an icon of something gone ... wrong or otherwise! A hous divided can't see the otherside so the complexity of emotions vs intellect continues as enigma ...

But you're not supposed to speak socially about such things you might learn while there ... in the Shadows?
 
"On an appointed day Herod put on his royal robes, took his seat upon the throne, and made an oration to them. And the people shouted, “The voice of a god, and not of man!” Immediately an angel of the Lord smote him, because he did not give God the glory; and he was eaten by worms and died. But the word of God grew and multiplied." Acts

 
Solomon offers a fine example of the character manifest in Herod. A deal maker adept at the securing of political advantage. A user of God’s name in service to personal gain. Quite contrary to what God shows us in the words and deeds of Jesus.
 
GeoFee said:
Solomon offers a fine example of the character manifest in Herod. A deal maker adept at the securing of political advantage. A user of God’s name in service to personal gain. Quite contrary to what God shows us in the words and deeds of Jesus.
Click to expand...

As long as it is good for business ... and screw the people ... them's the demos ... the option is to Pi Su Nit ... and this happens in this stage of the dark game ... wait a bit ... one step at a time dear gi Zus ...
 


Read between the lines w/ Ryan. The release of the memo is not "intended" to halt the Mueller investigation. But if the release sheds light that the investigation is a fraud, s**t happens. If the police enter your yard chasing a rabid Pitbull and see 3 dead bodies on your back porch! Their legal right to enter your yard was not intended to discover dead bodies, but s**t happens.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top