TRUMP - Some people think......... How do you feel?

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Register Log in
The weaker force was always demonic ... in the light of blindness ... who could see otherwise (alternately would that be deposed wisdom ... Kant's Num'y*Noews incident? The phenomenal numb in O' us?

Recall it is just a word ... when applied to everything ... that's god ... and it goes around ... altering things according to biblical alteration or strange interpretations to add spice to an otherwise eternal situation ... could be boring ...

Furthermore changes of that sort terrorize great institutions when encountering a stream of cognizance about things to be learned ... so they don't and label them alien gods and this god's unknown side becomes nun other ... and Ra' habitual zed ... in Zaed fashion ... orally speaking as laid out flat ... the gods tend to be slack and drive labour ... here in NB we have conflict of interest between governing and labouring ... governors don't like to function as the latter ... causes panic and terror ...

It is like sexuality in the flighty form ... thus Eve 'n angels .. creeping across the land to befall men as dark story or occult myth! Tis sacred ...
 
Then there is this ... as extant proposition opposing extinction:
ex·tant
ˈekstənt,ekˈstant/
adjective
adjective: extant
  1. (especially of a document) still in existence; surviving.
    "the original manuscript is no longer extant"
    synonyms: still existing, in existence, existent, surviving, remaining, undestroyed
    "extant manuscripts"

Imagine this as intinction on the psyche as eliminated from the emotional realm ... abstract, or otherwise occult form?

Did many myths get burned and thus return as dark aspirations ... archetypes?

Thus stuck wouldn't accept such Passovers ... especially in an arid psyche ... it would require some whetting ...

Are great documents of the past simply gestalt forms? Can you make something of them? Is there a point or spot to halt? At which point the vessel is again dragged into the functions ...

Recall this all goes on in the mind of an unknown god ... the known gods have been known to screw up the process until getting beyond themselves ... thus the mindful missals ... they must be out for a bit for Eire 'n explicitly !
 
Last edited:
Such profound thoughts can cause a great stir called vert egos ... baffles some powers how it can occur without great whines and owls ... natural calls ... one cannot speak of them in AI surroundings ... could screw up the great code !

Or was it dark and formless to begin ... Robin Williams Ort cloud as orchestrated ... leading to orchestration of activities in the ephemeral psyche ...

O' to leave the surly bonds of earth ... a place of means poorly applied? Few conceive of the further out Ide-R's ... like respect and balance of the duality ... if you can only take things one way ... success!!!

One must fail to learn ... something to think about in reverse meditation ... alternate ways?
 
Last edited:
Some smartass on his last day at Twitter turned off Trump's personal account last night. Twitter had it back up in 11 minutes but, needless to say, that employee is being hailed as a hero by many. I can't endorse someone misusing their admin privileges for any reason, but it did get a chuckle out of me nonetheless. Doubt Trump will get any kind of lesson from it, though (like, start acting a sane human being when tweeting).

Trump Twitter account shut down by employee on last day of work
 
Mendalla said:
Some smartass on his last day at Twitter turned off Trump's personal account last night. Twitter had it back up in 11 minutes but, needless to say, that employee is being hailed as a hero by many. I can't endorse someone misusing their admin privileges for any reason, but it did get a chuckle out of me nonetheless. Doubt Trump will get any kind of lesson from it, though (like, start acting a sane human being when tweeting).

Trump Twitter account shut down by employee on last day of work
Click to expand...

Then according to the concept behind DSM ... does one have to have a psyche for it to be disturbed or is that when psyche is in negative space ... emotionally off the handle? How does this fit this situation @Mendalla ... as a passive active occupational Eris 'n incident? Slower thoughts impeding, or just I'm paedance ... arresting cognizance ...
 
Somebody misusing their admin priveleges to potentially save the world, @Mendalla? Would that be a good enough circumstance?

However, I think it's better that he keeps tweeting because then we have a better idea of what he thinks.

I read that Twitter employees have been warning about Trump for years. He has broken their rules several times - as has been pointed out by several users who pushed to have him banned (threatening NK by tweet is as bad as it gets) - so maybe the employee did follow guidelines, while the company had been cutting him slack - making exceptions for him - because he's Trump.
 
Kimmio said:
Somebody misusing their admin priveleges to potentially save the world, @Mendalla? Would that be a good enough circumstance?
Click to expand...

Save the world, my arse. It was making a political statement, pure and simple. If he had done the same thing to Obama, then you'd be whining and some right winger would be talking about saving the world. If the world had been at stake, maybe I'd agree with you, but it wasn't.
 
Mendalla said:
Save the world, my arse. It was making a political statement, pure and simple. If he had done the same thing to Obama, then you'd be whining and some right winger would be talking about saving the world. If the world had been at stake, maybe I'd agree with you, but it wasn't.
Click to expand...
Actually, I think Trump's random tweeting foreign policy is dangerous and reckless oftentimes. His tweets threatening NK (a region where hundreds of millions live) was not within their guidelines. Neither has his racist name calling, been. But I think there's a strong argument for not conducting top level geopolitics and threatening countries on Twitter. Seems kinda unethical, no? Not the usual trolling. I think it's against their rules.

Obama never tweeted the way Trump does. It's not a partisan thing. Not the Twitter issue.
 
Kimmio said:
Actually, I think Trump's random tweeting foreign policy is dangerous and reckless oftentimes. His tweets threatening NK (a region where hundreds of millions live) was not within their guidelines. Neither has his racist name calling, been. But I think there's a strong argument for not conducting top level geopolitics and threatening countries on Twitter. Seems kinda unethical, no? Not the usual trolling. I think it's against their rules.

Obama never tweeted the way Trump does. It's not a partisan thing. Not the Twitter issue.
Click to expand...

It is against their rules, but given who he is, I don't think one employee on his last day is entitled to make that decision. I do think Twitter should act at some point but I also think the responsibility is not just theirs. He has people in his administration like John Kelly or Ivanka who should be working from that end to reign things in. If Twitter acts without some kind of support within the White House, he'll just raise a shitstorm some other way. In fact, keeping him on Twitter is probably safer than having him using other channels. No one really takes Twitter all that seriously anymore , partly because of his crap. Though, ironically, he may have saved Twitter by drawing attention to it. Prior to his use/abuse of it, they were looking unsuccessfully for a buyer.
 
Mendalla said:
It is against their rules, but given who he is, I don't think one employee on his last day is entitled to make that decision. I do think Twitter should act at some point but I also think the responsibility is not just theirs. He has people in his administration like John Kelly or Ivanka who should be working from that end to reign things in. If Twitter acts without some kind of support within the White House, he'll just raise a s**tstorm some other way. In fact, keeping him on Twitter is probably safer than having him using other channels. No one really takes Twitter all that seriously anymore , partly because of his crap. Though, ironically, he may have saved Twitter by drawing attention to it. Prior to his use/abuse of it, they were looking unsuccessfully for a buyer.
Click to expand...
I'm sure they knew they weren't entitled and/ or there is personal risk involved in that personal protest. If they didn't consider there might be consequences, they're pretty dumb. Is that non-violent civil disobedience? I agree it was a political move - because of the number of US citizens who are upset with Trump's use of Twitter and Twitter's refusal to do anything about (it's not easy for them - he's the Potus not a regular typical user) - but, as per Twitter's rules, and the employee's job - if they had suspended anyone else's account that might not have been misuse of admin privileges. They'd be doing their job. Is anyone but Trump upset about those lost 11 minutes of Tweet time?
 
Look. Trump is not the problem. He is a product of the problem.

The U.S., like Canada, is actually governed by top figures who are among the greediest and most stupid in the world. All of its wars have been fought to make the very rich ever richer. Their greedy. They have no sense of the consequences of what they are doing. They're steeped in corruption. And the news media, which they own, lie for them.

Bush was a murdering bastard. So was his father, especially in the unreported slaughter of 200,000 Maya in Guatemala. So was Obama. (And just about every president since 1945. American (and Canadian) big business, especially in mining, have a brutal and murderous history all over the world - as in Latin America and Africa. (But I'll bet you've never heard about that in our news media.)

The U.S. is collapsing out of the greed of its very wealthy, the corruption of its politicians, the delusions of its people. And much, much worse is to come.

And in the midst of all this, it remains determined on world conquest.

To say this is evil is putting mildly.But it certainly is true that we are facing an evil far, far worse that Hitler's Nazidom.

And we are not preparing for it at all. It is going to get much, much worse, more profoundly evil, and affect even greater parts of the world. Among other things, we are facing the almost certainly calamity of a billion refugees in this world within twenty years. I expect the only option we will use to deal with that is mass murder on the greatest scale ever seen.

And this comes from the world's leading Christian nation. And the churches are silent.

Almost everything about the churches in the U.S. (and Canada, and Britain, etc.) is wrong. We and they accept an economic system which is anti-Christian. Ditto for our social structures. Ditto for our addiction to war. Ditto for the greed of the most influential people in our Christian countries.

And there's not a peep out of Christians. Nor has there been a peep in the recent centuries of western brutality over most of the world. (In fact, we sent missionaries not to the abusers, but to the people they abuse.)

The Christian churches have ceased to have any relevance.
 
Thanks for your comments @Graeme Decarie. I agree. The fact that this president was even elected is a symptom of the larger problem. Your post makes me remember my social welfare history courses in university. It was scary that there would be a depression followed by a war. Prosperity would follow war. That pattern repeated itself more than once. As you know. It sure seemed to us in the class that greed ruled. Nothing since has changed this view.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top