TRUMP - Some people think......... How do you feel?

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Register Log in
If you wanted to keep tabs on what wikileaks is putting out or has put out, H. A. Goodman follows it pretty closely. He was a Bernie supporter who ended up voting for Jill.
 
I haven't checked the news in the past few hours. But so far as I know, there is no evidence of Russian manipulation of the vote. To determine that - and the extent - would require a massive and very, v ery long study of the information. And the public would have to have access to the so called evidence.
 
Pontifex Geronimo 13 said:
http://dailycaller.com/2016/12/13/the-new-mccarthyites/

It’s always risky to talk about what “history will show.” But at the end of all the investigations, we are likely to see that President Obama’s interventions in this election carried far more weight than that of the Russians.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/12/13/the-new-mccarthyites/#ixzz4SksthsFT
Click to expand...
It's not that uncommon for sitting presidents to endorse a candidate during an election and it is perfectly legal.
 
I think that those who told us Hillary would win by large margins really thought she would - they did not factor in the power of the alt-right behind the scenes or that it would even be possible that enough people would actually vote for an obvious huckster. And that obvious huckster was not Hillary - but he won and there's something wrong with that.
 
Kimmio said:
I think that those who told us Hillary would win by large margins really thought she would - they did not factor in the power of the alt-right behind the scenes or that it would even be possible that enough people would actually vote for an obvious huckster. And that obvious huckster was not Hillary - but he won and there's something wrong with that.
Click to expand...

What there's something wrong with is Trump's not keeping his promise to appoint a special prosecutor to look into Clinton's situation.
 
Jae said:
What there's something wrong with is Trump's not keeping his promise to appoint a special prosecutor to look into Clinton's situation.
Click to expand...

I'd be guessing that Drumpf has discovered that he'd like to keep a few secrets of his own...
 
He's made it very clear that he's not interested, that it was electioneering. Besides, if he really wanted to, he could just wait until (if) he becomes the POTUS. But he doesn't want to. He's already got the GOP mainstream in an uproar. McCain and that turtle McConnell are making treason noises about Russian interference.
 
Waterfall said:
My concern is not to defend Clinton but rather to check facts:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/may/05/clinton-cash-bill-hillary-scandal-book

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/...er-corrects-7-or-8-inaccurate-passages-117946

Author of Clinton Cash admits No Evidence...5:26

Click to expand...

He does have evidence. That is what Clinton cash is about. Proving it is another thing. Since the book there have been a lot of developments. Pay to play wikileaks. How foundation money is being used. If she doesn't get a get out of jail free card, she is in big T.

Why didn't she sue his butt off? Because then in court, truth tends to come out.
 
Pontifex Geronimo 13 said:
He does have evidence. That is what Clinton cash is about. Proving it is another thing. Since the book there have been a lot of developments. Pay to play wikileaks. How foundation money is being used. If she doesn't get a get out of jail free card, she is in big T.

Why didn't she sue his butt off? Because then in court, truth tends to come out.
Click to expand...
He is speculating on a personal theory.
Why didn't she sue his butt off? I have no idea it would only be speculation as is your idea.
 
There's lots of questions about what Drumpf's foundation has been used for as well. Politics, these days, seems to be a mud-slinging activity.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top