Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This brings us back to the pouring out of the spirit in the last days causing sons & daughters to prophesy ...What if one can already see that the seeds are for a poisonous fruit?
How does one reconcile being anti-war and appeal to peace with excusing war profiteering - the buying and selling and manufacturing of the machinery for war. As necessary to 'gainful' employment?With that also being true of peace. It appeals to many of us men as much as to women. I am about as anti-war as it gets even after a somewhat stereotypical "male" childhood of toy soldiers and war games.
Currently it is still a small group of male leaders who are holding us hostage to such games, started such "games" decades ago, and who have most influence in the arms race - including manufacturing and distribution.Though it is more men who actually do the fighting and who actually engage in acts of violence, war itself would be impossible without the collusion of an entire society. In this nuclear age it may be too dangerous to continue to uncritically accept the naive belief that war is an institution which appeals only to men and not to women.
It could be mainly women (and a changing of the old guard) who call an end to the arms race, and begin the work of scaling it back. And hopefully lots of men on their side, who would like to join that effort, too.Though it is more men who actually do the fighting and who actually engage in acts of violence, war itself would be impossible without the collusion of an entire society. In this nuclear age it may be too dangerous to continue to uncritically accept the naive belief that war is an institution which appeals only to men and not to women.
I realize that. But you understand the role - past and continuing - of patriarchy, right? You can't account for every individual in the history of men, or women, but we also can't ignore that there was and is an overarching, engrained, systemic male dominated establishment to consider. Men can - people of all genders but I think the key is more and more men allies who abandon the old establishment - and I hope increasingly will, call out and change the patriarchal establishment, too.With that also being true of peace. It appeals to many of us men as much as to women. I am about as anti-war as it gets even after a somewhat stereotypical "male" childhood of toy soldiers and war games.
Rough and tough guys like wars. And when people vote for the rough and tough guys they support their wars...then to turn around and call those signs of the end times and God’s plan, and pray for intervention...that doesn’t make sense. Nobody needs the thoughts and prayers by that point. They need people willing to change course and risk peace.
not sure why you post as such, the Greatest Gift this world has ever seen came by a WOMAN, who God uses , so much in Fact that God elevated her overall!
yes Kimmio, she was a woman
How does one reconcile being anti-war and appeal to peace with excusing war profiteering - the buying and selling and manufacturing of the machinery for war. As necessary to 'gainful' employment?
There is a plan ... Canada as a global exploiter in it's own right ...IOW, there needs to be a plan, not just a knee jerk response.
It could be mainly women (and a changing of the old guard) who call an end to the arms race, and begin the work of scaling it back. And hopefully lots of men on their side, who would like to join that effort, too.
We are already at the beginning of a new era of leadership where the balance is evening out, and more women are interested - in doing things differently.
There is a plan ... Canada as a global exploiter in it's own right ...
Abolishing patriarchy is about changing the way the world operates, not about abandoning men.
I'm not sure how people can build tanks in good faith. However, they are legal jobs. Too bad there can't be a quick transition to building something helpful and non-violent, and job openings for them to put their skills to use on that.If you're referring to my comments on General Dynamics, I have never "excused" it. I would prefer we not have an arms industry at all. I am, however, however suggesting that if the government forces an end to the contract, which is something I would support, the government has a responsibility to help any workers displaced beyond simply pogey. It is not as simple as slapping a retroactive boycott on the Saudis and walking away feeling good about it. The workers took legal jobs in good faith and should not be punished for it. IOW, there needs to be a plan, not just a knee jerk response. All of which could have been avoided if a ban on arms exports to the Saudis had been imposed years ago as it should have been. That way, the contract would never have been signed.