revsdd
Well-Known Member
Nature is based on survival of the fittest, not on survival of the kindest.
On a macro level, as far as evolutionary biology and process is concerned, that's correct. On a micro level, however, there are many species in which the strong have been known to help the weak and injured to survive. Such behaviour has been seen in animals as diverse as dolphins and ants. Wolves have been known to bring food to sick and injured members of the pack. Rats have been known to do the same thing. There have been inter-species examples of what appear to be acts of kindness or altruism. We all know stories of dolphins helping drowning humans - and sometimes even defending them against sharks (dolphins and whales being among the few creatures that even great white sharks tend to shy away from.) There's at least one video taken I believe at the Dublin Zoo where an orangutan very gently rescues a baby bird from drowning. Coco the gorilla had a pet kitten she cared for meticulously. Whether that behaviour is motivated by what humans would call "kindness" or "altruism" or even less likely "morality" is open to question, but I think we need to be careful about taking the macro level concept of survival of the fittest and assuming that's a law of nature on the micro level.
In "The Voice of the Coyote," J. Frank Dobie spoke of the potential for abuse of the survival of the fittest concept: "The fang and claw conception of life in the wild has been overemphasized by a society devoted to propagating the philosophy of greed under the guise of free enterprise."