That would be cool - right? I mean there are thousands of post and discussions about it out there. Maybe millions. Maybe I’ll ask it how many discussions it combed through to arrive at that summary lol
Last edited:
Random ChatGpt questions
- Thread starter JayneWonders
- Start date
Welcome to Wondercafe2!
A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!
Here’s another one.
Me:
There were no direct dehumanizing references to certain groups in Goebbels film. It was aimed at garnering upper middle class support for voluntary euthanasia so that involuntary euthanasia was less shocking and more acceptable to the public. Is this correct?
Ai:
Yes, you are correct in your assessment. Joseph Goebbels' film *Ich An Klage* was designed to appeal to the upper middle class and aimed to normalize the concept of voluntary euthanasia as a compassionate choice for individuals suffering from severe medical conditions. The film sought to create a narrative that framed euthanasia as a humane and ethical option, thereby softening public perception of more extreme measures that could follow, including involuntary euthanasia.
By presenting euthanasia in a sympathetic light, the film aimed to garner support for policies that would later facilitate broader and more controversial practices. The intention was to make the idea of euthanasia more palatable to the public, easing the transition into accepting more drastic measures without immediate backlash.
This strategy reflects a calculated approach to shaping societal attitudes toward assisted dying, where the normalization of voluntary euthanasia could pave the way for less voluntary practices under the guise of societal benefit or compassion. This context highlights the importance of ethical considerations in discussions about assisted dying and raises questions about the potential consequences of framing such policies in a way that could lead to the erosion of individual rights and protections.
Thank you for the clarification, and I appreciate your insights on this complex topic. If you have further questions or need additional information, feel free to ask!
Me:
There were no direct dehumanizing references to certain groups in Goebbels film. It was aimed at garnering upper middle class support for voluntary euthanasia so that involuntary euthanasia was less shocking and more acceptable to the public. Is this correct?
Ai:
Yes, you are correct in your assessment. Joseph Goebbels' film *Ich An Klage* was designed to appeal to the upper middle class and aimed to normalize the concept of voluntary euthanasia as a compassionate choice for individuals suffering from severe medical conditions. The film sought to create a narrative that framed euthanasia as a humane and ethical option, thereby softening public perception of more extreme measures that could follow, including involuntary euthanasia.
By presenting euthanasia in a sympathetic light, the film aimed to garner support for policies that would later facilitate broader and more controversial practices. The intention was to make the idea of euthanasia more palatable to the public, easing the transition into accepting more drastic measures without immediate backlash.
This strategy reflects a calculated approach to shaping societal attitudes toward assisted dying, where the normalization of voluntary euthanasia could pave the way for less voluntary practices under the guise of societal benefit or compassion. This context highlights the importance of ethical considerations in discussions about assisted dying and raises questions about the potential consequences of framing such policies in a way that could lead to the erosion of individual rights and protections.
Thank you for the clarification, and I appreciate your insights on this complex topic. If you have further questions or need additional information, feel free to ask!
It can’t tell me. It said:
I don’t collect information from specific sites or sources. Instead, I was trained on a mixture of licensed data, data created by human trainers, and publicly available information. This training allows me to generate responses based on a wide variety of information, but I don't have direct access to or the ability to reference specific articles or websites. My responses are based on the knowledge I've been trained on, up until October 2023. If you have specific questions or need insights on a topic, feel free to ask!
BetteTheRed
Resident Heretic
- Pronouns
- She/Her/Her
It's clear from Kimmio's questions and the generated answers that i) the phrasing of the question is important and ii) the instrument wishes you to like the answer it gives.
Maybe. It’s still true.
Mendalla
Happy headbanging ape!!
- Pronouns
- He/Him/His
Which is a big problem with the chatbot AIs. They are all about engagement and basically can fudge answers to get you to "like" them (not really "like" since they don't have an ego or desire to be liked, more to keep you engaged). Hank Green of Complexly media, the makers of SciShow and other educational content did a video on the SciShow channel about the current state of AI where he did talk about this and other outstanding problems with the current LLMs. It's kind of a promo for a site that is advocating for better controls on AI but there's some good, interesting content as usual for SciShow.
The answers to my questions are still true.
Me:
Are you trained to be biased to your human inquirer’s point of view?
AI:
I’m not programmed to be biased toward any specific point of view. Instead, my goal is to provide balanced and informative responses based on a wide range of knowledge and perspectives. I aim to encourage critical thinking and provide insights that can help you explore topics more deeply. If you have a particular viewpoint or context in mind, I can certainly tailor the discussion to that while still providing a well-rounded perspective.
Are you trained to be biased to your human inquirer’s point of view?
AI:
I’m not programmed to be biased toward any specific point of view. Instead, my goal is to provide balanced and informative responses based on a wide range of knowledge and perspectives. I aim to encourage critical thinking and provide insights that can help you explore topics more deeply. If you have a particular viewpoint or context in mind, I can certainly tailor the discussion to that while still providing a well-rounded perspective.