So suck it up; there's no defending it.
Suck what up? I quite enjoy being both white and Christian.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So suck it up; there's no defending it.
Suck up the fact that your particular demographic elected the wyrdest, least competent american president. ever.
White Christian. "Your" demographic, and mine, even though we weren't eligible to vote.
We are responsible.
So say I.
You were pretty eager to defend him before he started showing his true colours.
That's quite impossible for some of us on both accounts.
I'm not saying individuals are responsible for this boondoggle, but Christianity clearly didn't help people see the evil in this person. I'd argue that Christianity, and the conditioning to believe the unbelievable, helps Trump and his spokespeople convince Christians of lies they want to believe, right from "Obama is a Muslim Kenyan" to "the travel ban will keep Americans safe".White Christian. "Your" demographic, and mine, even though we weren't eligible to vote.
We are responsible.
I'm not saying individuals are responsible for this boondoggle, but Christianity clearly didn't help people see the evil in this person. I'd argue that Christianity, and the conditioning to believe the unbelievable, helps Trump and his spokespeople convince Christians of lies they want to believe, right from "Obama is a Muslim Kenyan" to "the travel ban will keep Americans safe".
And when I point out the lies, it's easy for Christians to dismiss me because I'm an atheist. Other Christians who can see the lies need to be more outspoken. Yes, there are some voices. We need more.
"the travel ban will keep Americans safe".
And when I point out the lies, it's easy for Christians to dismiss me because I'm an atheist.
This is something I was hoping I'd never have to write: Facts are not dependent on where you read them.The travel ban is a part of keeping America safe , Obama did somewhat similar with the same 7 countries , depending on which news media outlet you watch or read, Trump's decision seems driven in large part by partisan politics.
This is something I was hoping I'd never have to write: Facts are not dependent on where you read them.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...mparing-trumps-and-obamas-immigration-restri/
If you only read the words of liars, you could be convinced that the policies are "somewhat similar". They are not. Obama's directive was narrower and in response to Bowling Green, which the Trump team has twice referred to as a "massacre", when it was really a simple arrest - not even a single piece of fruit was massacred that day.
Trump's ban is stranding good people, separating families, preventing students from getting to universities, and hurting businesses. The 7 countries it lists are responsible for 0 terrorism-related deaths in the United States. Most of the 9/11 hijackers came from Saudi Arabia, which is not on the list.
This ban only serves to impress bigots who want fewer brown Muslims around. That's all it does. There is already vetting of refugees. This is a political move that is being struck down because it's illegal. It is not a legal move that is being struck down by politics, as Donald Trump and the conservative blogosphere would have you believe.
Try this sentence again.like I said , somewhat similar, what is interesting is that the same 7 countries were chosen by both parties, the problem with America is that the nation is divided, so you dont get a clear picture of whats truly going on by simply watching the news, there all bias, clearly the democrats are freaking out that Liberal's are in and the bias attacks will not stop.
Try this sentence again.