Some Thoughts on Thinking
It is not possible to make thinking known as itself. Thinking is that immediate activity of being which escapes description. Making it known involves me in a reduction. The process of thinking, thought, is presented as thoughts, the product of thinking. Product and process are as different as any polar pair.
Thinking flows as a continuous event in my awareness. It is directed now in this direction and now in that. It is not fixed. Nor can it be fixed. This is not to suggest that it is broken without hope of repair. My thinking is perfectly intact. Being intact means it is not liable to reduction of any sort. This is a given which is often forgotten.
We all think as the fact of our being human. That thinking is as automatic as our breathing. Our awareness of thinking gives rise to thoughts. There should be no confusion between the activity thinking and its production of thoughts. Thoughts are the reminder of thinking. They make known where thinking has been. But they cannot contain or reveal the thinking itself. No matter how minimal the gap between thinking and thought, they are forever and immutably distinct. Can this be proven?
The concern for proof is a refusal of being as itself. We wish to make a matter certain by establishing its proof. Thus we protect ourselves from the freedom which is resident in the activity, thinking. Being aware of thinking is too much sacrificed to being aware of thoughts. Thought is easily made to serve commodiously. It may be parleyed into the essential factors of power. It is the basic commodity of profit. Where the proof of one thought is extended to the claims of certainty it overrides a similar claim of another thought. These distinctions have no bearing on thinking.
We may say that all persons engage in thinking. We may not prove this. It is open to the acceptance of all. Each one need only consider personal experience to validate the claim. But the claim may not be imposed to bind another to its content.
Thinking is valid in its constitution of the basic singularity of being. Where there is thinking there is identity. This identity is the mark of evolution. Evolution conceived not as a progression of events but as the unfolding of potential.
The distinction is essential. Progress is motion in a direction open to an infinite possibility. The progress may be towards any undetermined but possible end. An unfolding potential is the realization of that which is already present in the fact of being. These are distinguished in the contrast of moving to or away from a centre.
Movement towards a centre may be accomplished from any point on a circumference. Movement from the centre is possible in any direction of the circumference. Movement to the centre tends to unification. Movement to the circumference, which extends infinitely outwards from the centre where the radius is defined as movement, tends to differentiation. Starting from a common centre, two points move proportionately further apart as they move from the centre. This identifies the modern dilemma.
Thus, I have the task of discovering that which is intrinsic to my being in the world. I am not oriented to becoming that which is not now available. I am not oriented to the future. The present is the place at which all that is possible already exists. At whatever point of the circumference and whatever the radius, I am irrevocably defined by my relation to the centre. That centre is my thinking, manifest here only as its memory. This is important for several reasons.
First it means that there is a completeness in me which may not be withheld by some external authority. There is no configuration of thought which may make any final claim on my thinking. It is this freedom which is negotiated away in the transaction of modern economy. Thoughts are valued in some hierarchical fashion. Bargaining is the process of accumulating a thought repertoire adequate to meet the challenge of another's similar though dissimilar thought repertoire.
Second, all of my relations are necessarily conditioned by a common relation to the centre. My consideration of any matter can not be finally determined by the particular point of view, location on the circumference at any given radius, without a final qualification by the centre. Each relation, then, is conditioned by the essential consideration of movement to or from the centre. A point moving to the centre is a thought consistent with my own thinking. A thought moving from the centre is a thought inconsistent with my thinking. All thinking is to or away from the centre. That is, all thinking is towards itself or away from itself.
Thinking towards itself is thinking consistent with itself. Thinking away from itself is thinking conditioned by some thought. Generally a thought projected into the future. Thus the thinking abandons itself as itself to seek itself in that which it may not possibly be.
This thinking is located in these present manifestations of thought. But the thinking itself is not resident. It passes through the form of thought to continue as itself on its way. That it continues does not imply an object to be realized at some future point in time. It is in itself the attainment of that which it seeks. Thinking is focussed on thinking.
Any thoughts on thinking...?
George