Thanks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But I don't think I'll be in a new relationship ever again, specifically one that involves sex. I don't want to. It's not worth it.
I certainly have met no perfect person along the way. I have met some who are doing their best to be their best.Character matters to me as well. But nobody's perfect.
I certainly have met no perfect person along the way. I have met some who are doing their best to be their best.
I guess what I am asking is if we can leave aside the porn that everyone agrees is "sinful" in my UU sense that it does not respect the inherent worth and dignity of the women in front of the camera and look at what porn might not be sinful. Is there acceptable "porn"? What would be the criteria? Can visual media porn, big studio or indie, ever fit that criteria or is it something that would probably only fit written material?
Or are we going the so-con route and saying you can't ever write/create stories that explicitly explore human sexuality without somehow exploiting or degrading someone; that it is all "sinful"?
Literary Erotica is 'published written works' that place sex acts at the center of the story?
I would not call for censorship of the 'writing' or 'reading ' of such material. I would caution against indoctrination of it as 'harmless'.
At least, in heterosexual porn, it's most often the men in front of the camera who are disrespecting the women in front of the camera...and it's the producers, the people who market it...and ultimately the viewers, who are disrespecting the women by proxy. But it's the men in front of the camera actually committing the disrespectful acts while the women pretend to enjoy it.Lest we forget the inherent worth and dignity of the 'men' in front of the camera. Is that respected?
Literary Erotica is 'published written works' that place sex acts at the center of the story?
I would not call for censorship of the 'writing' or 'reading ' of such material. I would caution against indoctrination of it as 'harmless'.
At least, in heterosexual porn, it's most often the men in front of the camera who are disrespecting the women in front of the camera...and it's the producers, the people who market it...and ultimately the viewers, who are disrespecting the women by proxy. But it's the men in front of the camera actually committing the disrespectful acts while the women pretend to enjoy it.
Yes. If they are letting degrading videos go to market and letting the male actors behave that way. If they are just competing with the male producers in a male driven market it's the same thing.@Kimmio Laughterlove , do you extend that to the rare (but increasingly common) scenario of women being the directors/producers/etc? They are doing hetero, not just lesbian.
But it's the men in front of the camera actually committing the disrespectful acts while the women pretend to enjoy it.
fightthenewdrug.org
...the bulk of the industry is exploitative. It doesn't surprise me that 5 men spoke out about it. In heterosexual porn where women are often disrespected and degraded on camera, it's by men. No doubt several of them were taken advantage of in the industry too, especially over money - still, it's the depictions and real actions that are perpetuated by men.To put an end to the “macho” and “dominant” facade that so many people in our society buy from the porn industry’s portrayal of men, we’ve assembled personal accounts from five former male porn stars who have since left the industry and have spoken out against the heartbreaking circumstances that pushed them into doing porn.
*READER DISCRETION ADVISED. Many may find the following accounts to be graphic, disturbing, and/or triggering.*
![]()
5 Male Ex-Performers Share What It's Really Like to Do Porn
The men in porn appear as though they are dominant and in control, but behind the scenes, they are often victims of the same harsh conditions and harmful situations as female performers.fightthenewdrug.org
Yes. If they are letting degrading videos go to market and letting the male actors behave that way. If they are just competing with the male producers in a male driven market it's the same thing.
I know. One of my ex's fantasy loves named Nina somebody - a porn star from the 80s-90s was doing that. And Candida Royale (her name suggests not much changed)...but I think it's pretty much the same with fancier/ prettier sets, maybe they take longer to get to the degrading "money shot". They were indoctrinated by the male dominated industry and how things work in that world.But are they? In the interviews I have seen with female porn producers, they usually suggest that they are trying to do it differently, trying to get away from the male-focussed approach.
en.m.wikipedia.org
Keep In Mind this is just one Pornhub ...Oh, FFS. Sex for money has always been available. "Public health crisis of the digital age"?
