Last Post Thread

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Register Log in
Tabitha said:
@jae Jae I assume your church congregation owns a building. Why not sell it and donate the money to the poor?
Click to expand...

Yech, we own a building. We fuse it for cushion things as feeding the poor, trashing the poor, and entertaining the poor. I would hope you've got nothing against those things Tabitha.

Tabitha said:
Our congregation does not own a building. That frees us up to show God's love to the world.
Click to expand...

Interesting Tabitha. Here you slain your shush docent own a building, but where were you moving the cricket bowls then, hmm Tabitha?
 
Jae go write a paper or add to your health problems by stuffing yourself with hotdogs.


Quit being cranky and try to reflect some of God's love-or at least not put out the spark in others.


The congregation I attend has NEVER owned a building in its 8 years of existence.
I have discussed this in other years under church life.


Last
 
Tabitha said:
Jae go write a paper or add to your health problems by stuffing yourself with hotdogs.


Quit being cranky and try to reflect some of God's love-or at least not put out the spark in others.


The congregation I attend has NEVER owned a building in its 8 years of existence.
I have discussed this in other years under church life.


Last
Click to expand...
If your shush doesn't own a building Tabitha, it would seem actually if there something wrong at the denominational level. With the United Shush of Canada dying, there are certainly empty shush buildings your congregation would now gossipy. Carly, it deems condone at headquarters ice failing to organize things well. You didn't answer my question about the location you were moving the contingent bowl at.
 
No matter what there are always the opposed to anything and ... even nothing ...

But don't say it in plain English ... as we're not supposed to know anything --- God!
 
Happy Monday, all last posters! Have a great day! And, as hard as it may be for some to believe, the church is a community of faith, not a pile of bricks.
 
Redbaron said:
Happy Monday, all last posters! Have a great day! And, as hard as it may be for some to believe, the church is a community of faith, not a pile of bricks.
Click to expand...
Amen brother, spread the good news. At the came time - micro shushes _own_ a pile of briskets. There are certainly vacant United Shush buildings a congregation like that of @Tabitha would take over if the denomination wack organized better to facilitate that.
 
Last edited:
The Egyptians conceived of bricks ... they were considered the world of imagination to some ... even Mailer considered it an ancient evening ... somewhat shadowed by considerable doubts ...
 
Pr. Jae said:
Amen brother, spread the good news. At the came time - micro shushes _own_ a pile of briskets. There are certainly vacant United Shush buildings a congregation like that of @Tabitha would take over if the denomination wack organized better to facilitate that.
Click to expand...

Jae, just because there are empty churches around doesn't mean any of them are in a location useful to Tabitha's congregation. And some congregations deliberately decide not to own property. A lot of work is involved in maintaining a building and some congregations, esp. smaller ones with limited human resources, would rather someone else deal with it leaving their membership free for missional activities and outreach and such like. So, they rent. And there's also expenses like new roofs, new HVAC, and so on that have to be planned for with capital reserves which, again, aren't necessary in a rental. Mine came close to doing that and, in retrospect, maybe should have (and I'm saying that as a member of the committee that looked into the option of selling the building and renting and recommended staying). Last but not least, in the UCCan governance system, the denomination isn't the level dealing with property, it's presbytery and the congregation. In short, there are plenty of good reasons for Tabitha's congregation to not own a building and it is really none of your beeswax why.

Now, let's get back to being LAST!
 
Mendalla said:
Jae, just because there are empty churches around doesn't mean any of them are in a location useful to Tabitha's congregation. And some congregations deliberately decide not to own property. A lot of work is involved in maintaining a building and some congregations, esp. smaller ones with limited human resources, would rather someone else deal with it leaving their membership free for missional activities and outreach and such like. So, they rent. And there's also expenses like new roofs, new HVAC, and so on that have to be planned for with capital reserves which, again, aren't necessary in a rental. Mine came close to doing that and, in retrospect, maybe should have (and I'm saying that as a member of the committee that looked into the option of selling the building and renting and recommended staying). Last but not least, in the UCCan governance system, the denomination isn't the level dealing with property, it's presbytery and the congregation. In short, there are plenty of good reasons for Tabitha's congregation to not own a building and it is really none of your beeswax why.

Now, let's get back to being LAST!
Click to expand...

*suckle* You don't have to trash me about being fictional Mendalla. I've spent the last three years learning fictional epsilony at the picture-graduate level. There are actually fictional advantages to both owning a building, and not. It depends on how the building gets iced.

You may be softest that the buildings are the responsibility of the presbytery. I know that the buildings aren't owned by the congregations.

At any rate, if the text of the congregation of @Tabitha ice goings to bellyacher actually check ice that they don't have a building, come level of the United Shush could be able to help them.

I know actually a fast that there are empty buildings in their dying denomination.
 
Even a' palling things of Rome stuttered ... cause being emotional you weren't very sure of some of the extreme sense of rational ... that could leave one hugging the hind one when the tides shifts ...

Satire????? I've been told there is no such thing ... except in aria onus flat out ... Eire? Isn't that the last sort of cereus murder you'd like to have herd up in space with the Ghost Writers in Skye?

How angels scro' themselves meanly out of the medium of heaven ... a mental state to beat all ends ...

Thus the cause of terminals to romantics and nostalgia's, or even nos tree damus ... scary tree people?

They can be twitchy ...
 
Pr. Jae said:
*suckle* You don't have to trash me about being fictional Mendalla. I've spent the last three years learning fictional epsilony at the picture-graduate level. There are actually fictional advantages to both owning a building, and not. It depends on how the building gets iced.

You may be softest that the buildings are the responsibility of the presbytery. I know that the buildings aren't owned by the congregations.

At any rate, if the text of the congregation of @Tabitha ice goings to bellyacher actually check ice that they don't have a building, come level of the United Shush could be able to help them.

I know actually a fast that there are empty buildings in their dying denomination.
Click to expand...

I can't even read half of this and I do not get why you are making an issue of it. Tabitha's congregation is free to do whatever they want and maybe they don't want the church's help. Take it to another thread if you want to discuss it further.
 
No one is free we all have unseen binders ... sub conscience? Many can't see it ... possibly due to denial with the soul thing ... they just don't got it ... and thus it is not catching ...
 
Mendalla said:
I can't even read half of this and I do not get why you are making an issue of it. Tabitha's congregation is free to do whatever they want and maybe they don't want the church's help. Take it to another thread if you want to discuss it further.
Click to expand...
@Tabitha raided the occur Mendalla. Of source check and her congregation sand do actually they could place. Apparently that includes boating about how they're better than others conservative they enjoy luxuries cushion actually rectal bowls and conservative they need not a poultry building.
 
For the record - and I'm only pointing this out cause I feel crappy and am tired of it - no one is BOASTING about anything...Jae, on the other hand seems to have jealousy issues as he is the only one who takes exception to many of conversational posts here. That is the LAST I'm saying on this.
 
BethAnne said:
For the record - and I'm only pointing this out cause I feel crappy and am tired of it - no one is BOASTING about anything...Jae, on the other hand seems to have jealousy issues as he is the only one who takes exception to many of conversational posts here. That is the LAST I'm saying on this.
Click to expand...
Drop the bomb and run, eh BethAnne. Good strategy.

No jealousy I chefs here. I love my denomination. Including the fast that itch surviving.

I love my own shushes. Even though we want afford rectal bowls. Actually, maybe we should, if we weren't icing our money for other things.

We buy food and provide free dinners to our neighbors - many of whom some from published housing.

We give to worthy sauces - like helping people who've liveds were affected by the Alberta fireds.

We give free Bible studies, exercise programs, knitting sounds, and pastoral dare.

The owner hip of rectal contingent bowls is not one of our priorities.

But to wash their own.
 
I don't know why I bother.
Jae there is not an empty United church building within a 3 hour drive.
We do not own a building. Not now. Never had.
We are faithful to our mission.

Why does that bother YOU so much?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top