WhyCzar
Connect The Dots
- Pronouns
- They/Them/Their
AI?Even when life feels dissociated or “out of it,” there’s a grounding truth
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AI?Even when life feels dissociated or “out of it,” there’s a grounding truth
The transcendent truths, Luce, endure, even if hidden under layers.Its because the winners gather power of physical wealth and give little value to any lessor virtue ... and thus thoughts sinks like crap ... i.e. how knowledge and associated stuff that is referred to as little value ends up down there in the heap ...
In such delinquency the bottom regularly falls out as fresh knowledge flows by the creature forming the bridge ... it may be transcalent in nature ... just passing in lumps ... some declare it transcendent as it may go up and down with the levels, layers and all such as stacked on the Levi? Really just a groove in the landscape ... here it is said some disposed of thought sinks in ... subtle?
No. Why do you ask?
Guess because the Yankee dollar has more value compared to the Canuck buckHowzit that Canadian whiskey costs less in the US than it does in Canada?
I recently purchased two 1.75 litre bottles Canadian Club in the US. at the price of 17.99 $US each.Guess because the Yankee dollar has more value compared to the Canuck buck
Sorry, WhyCzar, I honestly have no idea. Not only have I not been in Canada for years, I've never bought whiskey in my lifeCan you buy two 1.75 litre bottles of CC for 50 Cndn dollars in Canada?
Howzit Canada’s public funding for news media is substantially larger and more central than in the US?Howzit America has press freedom, but Canada has more press freedom?
Well, first off, we have no idea how realistic those are. A lot of the Alexander and Caesar ones are almost certainly idealized, even ones that are close to contemporary. Public art was more propaganda than realistic portraiture. Even the ones we have of old Aristotle seem suspiciously "generic philosopher" at times. But those were all people who were prominent in society and two of them, Alexander and Caesar, were men of power so natural subjects for public and private art.Howzit that there are realistic statues and busks of Aristotle, Alexander the great and Julius Ceasar but not of a realistic Jesus?
Because we followed the UK model and started a public radio network that then spawned a public television network. We have also, right or wrongly, believed that maintaining Canadian voices in the media is important to counteract the very loud voices coming from South of us. So you have things like subsidies for mailing Canadian magazines and targeted protection for Canadian media to ensure the US can't outcompete them. Unfortunately, that has also resulted in media concentration in a few hands (e.g. Bell owning CTV and the Globe as well as national wired and wireless communications networks).Howzit Canada’s public funding for news media is substantially larger and more central than in the US?
Those guys all existed.Howzit that there are realistic statues and busks of Aristotle, Alexander the great and Julius Ceasar but not of a realistic Jesus?
That's hardly a factor. Look how many Roman and Greek statues there are of mythological figures or semi-legendary figures. Even the busts we have of Homer owe more to traditions about him than any reality. And his existence is open to question as well given the nature of the texts (recorded oral traditions) attributed to him. Statues of Jesus appear once he becomes important. That's what matters more than his reality or lack thereof.Those guys all existed.
Because we have laws regulating the sale of alcohol, including provincial control of those sales. Can't speak to other provinces, but in Ontario, the distribution system is controlled by the government, including distribution to stores that have been licensed to sell booze. A distributor of a product is free to pull that product from distribution as long as they accept the loss of revenue incurred by doing so (which doesn't seem to be happening in this case since Canadians are apparently voting with pocketbook anyhow). This is an unusual case, though. Usually, you would only do that for a health and safety recall or similar.Howzit that provincial governments were allowed to pull legal imports from shelves and directly restrict consumer choice without consumer input?
Howzit that by restocking it later as a “gesture of good faith” in trade talks erases the original decision to treat ordinary buyers as secondary to political leverage?