Ethiopian Bible Describes Where Souls Go After Death | The Truth About Sheol From the Book of Enoch--

[unsafe]

AI is very Smart --Folks ------the Ark ties the Old Testament with the New Testament ------one door for Salvation ----those who enter that door of Christ's Faith are saved -----



AI

Noah's Ark In biblical typology, it serves as a powerful metaphor for salvation, refuge, and divine deliverance. [1, 2, 3]

Many theologians point out fascinating parallels between the Ark and the concept of spiritual salvation: [1, 2]

The Single Door: Just as the Ark had only one entrance, theologically, there is considered to be one path to salvation.

The Divine Architect: God commanded the building of the vessel and personally "shut the door," securing those inside.

No Steering Mechanism: The Ark had no rudder or sail, meaning its passengers had to surrender completely to God's guidance and protection.

Sanctuary from Judgment: The Ark withstood the destructive waters, representing a shelter from spiritual destruction. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]

This ancient motif of the Ark as a place of rescue also echoes in the concept of the Church and acts as an early symbol of baptismal rebirth. [1, 2]

 

[Luce NDs]

AI or aye that's autonomous ... no questions asked ... so it cannot be enlarged upon under Wesleyan Theory ... that would go further than orthodox (established, hardened) and a squeak would escape ... small wines ... a wind in the willow ... whisper in the pine ...

Ayres, Eire, air thought breezing through ... circulation? Stagnant spots cause reduction ... thus alien wanderers ... bringing in fresh matter ... that we don't want to recirculate ... Kush, Isis, Wake, d' eathe ...

There are a vast bunch of other words to make it sacred ... hidden ... g Noe Sticks ... dashes of unseen light ... meant to be shared ... if excessively gathered they cause ignorance also ... share quietly by special expressions ... unknown word? Mysterious word ... curios!

 

[chansen]

ChatGPT: Did Noah's Ark really happen?


Whether Noah's Ark “really happened” depends a lot on whether you’re asking from a religious, historical, or scientific perspective.

Here’s the broad consensus from different viewpoints:

• Religious traditions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam) often treat the story as spiritually important, and some believers interpret it as a literal historical event.
• Most historians, archaeologists, and geologists do not think there was a worldwide flood that covered the entire Earth and wiped out all life except what was on one ark.
• There is no scientific evidence for a global flood occurring within human history. A flood large enough to cover mountains would leave unmistakable geological evidence worldwide, and that evidence has not been found.
• Many scholars think the story may preserve memories of large regional floods in the ancient Near East. Ancient Mesopotamian cultures had several flood stories, including the Epic of Gilgamesh, which contains a strikingly similar ark-and-flood narrative.

Some reasons scientists are skeptical of a literal global flood:

• The amount of water required is physically implausible.
• Ice cores, tree rings, and sediment layers show continuous histories that don’t match a recent worldwide catastrophe.
• Modern genetics and biodiversity don’t fit the idea that all animals descended from pairs on a single boat a few thousand years ago.

At the same time, many religious believers see the story as conveying theological truths — about judgment, mercy, covenant, or human morality — rather than as a scientific account.

So the short answer is:

• Literal global flood: not supported by mainstream science or archaeology.
• Possible basis in a real regional flood: plausible and widely discussed.
• Religious meaning: deeply important to billions of people regardless of historicity.

I absolutely hate AI, but if that's what you believe, then here you go.

 

[Mendalla]

Good summary, really. Fits with how I see the place of the story. It's a myth, meaning a story that is spiritually or culturally important, but not literally, empirically true.

 

[chansen]

And I'm fine with that as well. If you see "truths" in the story, great. If you enjoy the symbolism, fantastic. If you think you need a 6:1 length:width ratio for a raft, okay, that's hardly necessary, but whatever. But if you say the story happened and everyone else who has not found a shred of evidence in favour of it is wrong, then you're gonna get pushback from those who value evidence.

 

[chansen]

What unsafe isn't showing, is what AI engine she is using and what her prompts are. I made sure to show mine. AI will go where you lead it, so if your prompt assumes Noah had an Ark and God went all genocidal, then it will start with that premise. I'm sure there are also Christian AI engines as well, that dispense with the outdated need for "evidence" and roll with the biblical accounts and certain interpretations of it that its masters prefer.

 

[Luce NDs]

What unsafe isn't showing, is what AI engine she is using and what her prompts are. I made sure to show mine. AI will go where you lead it, so if your prompt assumes Noah had an Ark and God went all genocidal, then it will start with that premise. I'm sure there are also Christian AI engines as well, that dispense with the outdated need for "evidence" and roll with the biblical accounts and certain interpretations of it that its masters prefer.

If studies, as some folk defined epistemology, ontology and the simple ideal of ideals in themself; it is all about knowledge and the mystery of being aware or conscious. In some elaborations the very fact of understanding the problem is beyond the subject of the very process. Some folk take this a meta physic (beyond, above or around physics) and physical dominion is where we are located. In which case we cannot observe it because we are inside the enigma. It that a mind bender? I would take it to be so ... imagine the implications in that statement as prescient lines are warped.

A parallel, or metaphor might be represented by a violent storm of density variant ... or a disturbance in the harder ports of a tough idealism so as to simulate reflection in a dark transmitter/reflector as a focal point of no volume or weight because those qualities have vanished because of functions unimaginable ... like disruption of gravity and attraction so the unknown item gets beyond the aware field. Could this resemble a aberration of psyche (non-physical) dimension?

Sounds warped enough to suit my experiences with people having excess will and desire that distort knowledge ... hard to believe if the very idea of psyche is beyond us? Then in the agape sector of ultimacy allows for fringe personality development on that edge. Image a fringe effect in the state of heaven to allow a screw up in the air of that abstract. Would that be a side by side to reality of physical nature to allow a missing part as if something laid outside the matrix? Sounds to me like quantum math and irregular calculations of impossible points like Sq. Root of the negative function ... as logically something that just isn't or maybe incarnate in the manifest ... or without freight, baggage, etc. as the non-physical was highjacked producing a 'ole place like water with bubbles as it brews! Few can deal with the actuality of sudden spontaneous bubbles ...

Now reproject this as a violent broiling of gasses under huge gravity and the consequences are beyond our present knowledge ... like water at critical conditions. Would that not be hard, solid, tough enigma? Like the midnight portion of sun ... a smoking black body representing something unfathomable in plain words! Out of this erupts a subatomic plasma ... a bleed out of contrary nature. This fluid just cannot coexist in the dell or tunnel of mind in so many words! Thus expletive if the awareness in comprehensively strange ... unknown winds transiting the gap?

Now if the physical body is a mental construct would there be two irrational essences doing a dance; opposed ghosts in the heaven, one white streak one an unseen Black Band? It is sung that one has to go in a wine of sad muse ... like a great mouth in the night ...

Many dropping out of consciousness feel a sort of falling into the detestable chore as Celts cutting Peet ... done best with a shanty to mark time!

Some say beats me ... thus bun warming ... to form a red rider (carrier)! I carry us ... fiery bird ... or Pontiac, the indi*genous ... flashing down by the streams in the desert ... now a classic woman of gentile characteristics ... lessor spirit renting a cocked up leader?

Imagine the pile of words to a rain dance with that cat ... or a bun-neigh down the hole? French baguette ... Cyrillic haggis! Weird ... becoming familiar.

 

[Luce NDs]

Innate protoplasm ... while opposed is mitochondrial matter wrapped about altered NA's ... nucleic acids? Some are messenger denied by RFK as he believes like the winner to be perfection ... an inadequate idealism ... denied but relatively out of touch ... and the silent whine is keep the way clear in the fog ... penetrating slurry? Like poli' slick ...

 

[chansen]

@unsafe which AI engine, settings and what prompts are you using?

I tried "Chistian AI" and that's wild. You can choose AI answers from dozens of different Christian denominations. Which shows that Christian AI will give you whatever you ask for. It doesn't evaluate anything - it just spits out the sort of answer you want.

 

[Mendalla]

It doesn't evaluate anything - it just spits out the sort of answer you want.

In fact, there's studies showing that's how LLM AIs work in general when you ask them questions of a subjective nature. They will naturally give answers that please the asker. Which is why I tend to not trust them for searches related to opinion-type questions. Generate code? Sure, even if I want a human review before I will run it (there's a lot of discussion on Xenforo Community about actually using multiple AIs and then comparing so that they basically check each other's code). But ask them a question expecting a "right" answer? Nope. I'll still use a general search engine and even if I start by looking at the Gemini summary, I still look at search hits and the references embedded in the AI summary, too. I won't rely on an AI summary without knowing what's behind it.

 

[chansen]

How do you feel about an AI summary with unsafe behind it?

 

[Luce NDs]

How do you feel about an AI summary with unsafe behind it?

Indeterminate as a schism of body and soul ... scattered portions ... broken people when power is unconfined!

I find it humbling to back away from such desire for power so as to observe and learn from under the trees ... a stroll in the garden of psyche to gather alternate blossoms? Ideal abstract ... vast escape ... there heh was ... incapsulated in great space ...

 

[unsafe]

YA ___YA __YA -----same old answers ---all the time ---when all else fails go after AI ---or the person posting God's word ---or the Bible itself ---all so funny and laughable -----

 

[unsafe]

Here is one from AI for nonbelievers ----

AI Overview




Religious texts often challenge comfort zones. Many passages provoke strong reactions in non-believers.

Concepts That Cause Friction

• Exclusivity: Claims that only one religion holds the truth.
• Moral Absolute: Strict codes that reject modern social norms.
• Eternal Judgment: Concepts of hell and permanent punishment.
• Human Depravity: Teachings that people are inherently flawed.
• Divine Sovereignty: The idea of a higher power demanding submission.

I say ---these make unbelievers squirm in their seats cause they hate Truth ------that is the real issue here Folks------ not AI ==


OH NO !!!!!!!NOT TRUTH _______

-------

---------

 

[Luce NDs]

It is said in paired "cynic" ... that the other side is always ridiculed until you ultimately gather!

When God's Word and man(kind) have an encounter ... which side will raise most rejection and not wish to go there?

If they go there ... might they learn something they didn't want to know? Thus a great gap until something of catastrophe in the heavens ... collapse?

How the word got laid out after the fallacy ... the lie about one line when it had 2 sides ... that propagated into multiples and so that's how will disperses in profound observation of the entire domain of multiple dimension plus enlightened (Christ) time ... as light years ...

They do dash by if you busy yourself with debate rather than discussion (said to be a point of this site) and there are those that cannot accept the extent of god's ways ... as they confine the ultimate as they believe they will benefit to the detriment of the lessor folk ... un Christian?

True Christianity seems to be out there a stretch and thus considerable stress as the gifts are not being shared. Reality seems to include a loss in efficacy and we ask about that place where the loss goes. It may incarnate as a loss of knowledge (psyche) and wisdom (sopher) indicating it is across a great divide ... reality is left gaping ... at the urge to be numbed to events ...

There is something subtle that picks up on that remnant in the hypothetical pool ... a shadowed identity! Abstract from the absolute perspective ... leaving the uncertain and indeterminate waiting to see the consequence ... the opposition doesn't believe in consequences ... una wakened? It seems there are always sleepers required to support the way out ... dreams (incarnate)!

Can we learn while out of the land of desire? OZ hum ... 4 degrees ... 10,000 shadows? Fears to get over so you can look into the alien? Resembles Moses and other MU's rising up to look over the foundations ... appreciate what systematically supports ... Christ Aline clarity ... a gem's tone singing from a classic dashing ... distant swirl ... the ultimate sad song? Just look at the it in reality ... the spirit I mean ... is severe and doesn't want to be here as degraded by soul of winning emotions ... the gambler? What if the drive reverses in a mental reflection ... dependant on presence of mind ... unlikely in vast emotional ravings ... rants and all the resistance to I and E ... i.e. a pseudo force of gentility? God said that power would fade ... like that sense of monster in the room ... as the infinite closes in a a shrink ... sharp formations? Dunes 'ai ... shifting grits ... what the grind comes down to ... very fine particles ...

 

[Luce NDs]

Here is one from AI for nonbelievers ----

AI Overview




Religious texts often challenge comfort zones. Many passages provoke strong reactions in non-believers.

Concepts That Cause Friction

• Exclusivity: Claims that only one religion holds the truth.
• Moral Absolute: Strict codes that reject modern social norms.
• Eternal Judgment: Concepts of hell and permanent punishment.
• Human Depravity: Teachings that people are inherently flawed.
• Divine Sovereignty: The idea of a higher power demanding submission.

I say ---these make unbelievers squirm in their seats cause they hate Truth ------that is the real issue here Folks------ not AI ==


OH NO !!!!!!!NOT TRUTH _______

-------

---------View attachment 12513

Are you conscious of the depth you just presented or just the superficial side on the face of it ... a masque? Look at it from taking a pace away ... from the individual, autonomous "I" ... that quick reaction in a dash or the like ... yanked out?

That twitch and shimmer ... phantom?

 

[Luce NDs]

Will avarice cause the end of reality causing only the lesson to be learned ... out there on the fringe as Borderline Personality Disorder as one looks down ... with head bowed? Pride and prejudices consequence ... loss of the critical faction ... light thoughts take off ... in darkened forms ... letterman and hummers in dark robes ... can this be noted in the journaling (with authorities attempting to interfere with communication and communing)? Warpage and curves inclusive ...

Can only one lesson be caught in the great complexity ... singular assignments according to ability? There's more to God and word than restriction ... requiring vast caution, care and bother! That's experience ... within context of minus ... that which appears as isn't ...

 

[chansen]

@unsafe

Let me repeat my same question:

Which AI engine, settings and what prompts are you using?

I'm not suggesting you can't post AI. I do think you owe us the source of that AI and the prompts you are feeding it.

But yeah, the jokes at the expense of AI are funny. They pretty much write themselves.

 

[Mendalla]

I do think you owe us the source of that AI and the prompts you are feeding it.

This exactly. To be a bit blunt, absent this information, we have no basis for evaluating AI generated posts and are within our rights to be suspicious of them. LLM AIs still hallucinate and make stupid mistakes. They pick up and amplify the biases of their source and the prompter. They need thoughtful human evaluation, not blind faith in the AI's capabilities. Posting AI generated content without know how it was generated is basically posting untrustworthy content. AI-generated content really no more valid or trustworthy than posting content from a random, uncited web source so having this information is needed for us to respond properly.

 

[unsafe]

AI generated posts and are within our rights to be suspicious of them.

you all don't need AI to be suspicious ---your all suspicious whether AI is used or not when it comes to God and His word ---again ---same old --same old ----- ---excuses --excuses --always excuses =====

AI Overview

The the Bible is infallible and inerrant



-

-------OH YA !!!!!!!!!!!