Say what you will about his treatment of women, but business-wise, he was a pretty cool, level-headed guy by all accounts..
This comment is just stupid.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Say what you will about his treatment of women, but business-wise, he was a pretty cool, level-headed guy by all accounts..
As if being a good business man should negate his negative impact on women being treated like objects and commodities and what an ideal woman looks like.He built a media empire. He could be controlling, but I've not heard him be described as a tyrant. Not sure how you describe Mendalla's post as "stupid".
Of course it doesn't.....but what was that business again.....oh yeah, profiting off of beautiful women.One's attitude to women does not mean one cannot be thoughtful and level-headed in how one conducts business. I highly doubt Hef would be pushing us to the brink of war with North Korea or picking fights with football leagues. And, given his editorial stances over the years, we would likely have a socially liberal administration that was pro-choice and pro-LGBTQ rights. IOW, like it or not, a big improvement over what they have now.
As if being a good business man should negate his negative impact on women being treated like objects and commodities and what an ideal woman looks like.
I'm not going to off on a tangent about this......said my piece.....as a woman, I am not impressed with Hugh Hefner, his business or how he became rich.I was comparing Hefner to the current regime, not saying he was in any way morally upright or an ideal candidate. See my post above though.
It's stupid because how one's attitude toward women and how one runs a business are not somehow mutually exclusive. It's not like saying his favourite flavour of ice cream has nothing to do with how he can run a business (which would've therefore make him a better president). Women are human beings and half of the voting population, and more than just pretty play-things to be held in seperate regard from other decisions in civic life and society - if he were to have been POTUS. It's like saying someone who built a business out of exploiting minorities would make a level headed POTUS. That's why it's stupid. Anyhooo...He built a media empire. He could be controlling, but I've not heard him be described as a tyrant. Not sure how you describe Mendalla's post as "stupid".
Okay, once again.
I am not advocating for Hugh Hefner as POTUS.
I was thinking it's more like admiring Pol Pot or Stalin for their leadership abilities over Trump.Just supporting and agreeing with Waterfall. Try this on:
One's attitude toward lawn ornaments shouldn't affect their ability to make level headed business decisions, as a POTUS.
One's attitude toward tea cups vs. mugs shouldn't affect their ability to make level headed business decisions, as POTUS
One's attitude toward uncooked vegetables shouldn't affect their ability to make level headed business decisions, as POTUS.
One's attitude toward women shouldn't affect their ability to make level headed business decisions as POTUS.
Now:
One's attitude toward global warming shouldn't affect their ability to make level headed business decisions, as POTUS.
One's attitude toward ethnic minorities shouldn't affect their ability to make level headed business decisions, as POTUS.
One's attitude toward healthcare shouldn't affect their ability to make level headed business decisions, as POTUS.
One's attitude toward women shouldn't affect their ability to make level headed business decisions, as POTUS.
To make your original point you, perhaps subconsciously, objectified women. That's why it was a "stupid" comment, imo.Okay, once again.
I am not advocating for Hugh Hefner as POTUS. I am merely saying he would have been a less bad choice in some regards than the twit who is in there now. If you think that is "stupid", so be it.
Because he was smarter and more manipulative - less transparent - at his bigotry and oppression, yes. I can see that. That would make him maybe even more dangerous.I was thinking it's more like admiring Pol Pot or Stalin for their leadership abilities over Trump.