Recent content by Pavlos Maros

Agreed Kay. The point I was making is that saying aspartame as a artificial sweetener is dangerous is wrong. Yes it is artificial even if it is two natural chemicals fused together, that never fused naturally. One chemical of those two is dangerous to people with PKU. Its in real foods, meats...

My apologies if I came across as rude. I should not assume, it certainly makes a fool of me.

Aspartame is a man-made fusion of two natural chemicals. One half is phenylalanine, which is the dangerous part, but only to people with PKU (phenylketonuria). Aspartame is not only in canned drinks, it is also in flavoured waters and some juice drinks, chewing gum, gelatin jelly, puddings and...

Have You tried in all the foods it's put in.Or just canned drinks?

There's this man-made sweetener called aspartame, used in canned diet drinks and tons of other 'sugar-free' stuff, that some people scaremonger as extremely dangerous. The reality is much less dramatic. Aspartame is only a genuine concern for people with phenylketonuria (PKU), a rare genetic...

This definitely raises the spirits.

Wow! That surprises me that you are here complaining about NOISE, given that you have spent the last few days creating nothing but a repetitive, contradictory racket to avoid answering for your own lack of integrity. You dismiss established theology as noise while you scramble from one thread to...

Starting yet another thread to play the part of a mystic does not hide the fact that you have fled from every previous discussion where your logic was challenged. You speak of reconnecting to life and rejecting divisiveness, yet you have spent the last few days being a dishonest interlocutor...

You are the one posing as a spiritual authority, yet you are falling back on basic Sunday School riddles to distract the group. It is quite telling that you have started a fresh thread to ponder the mechanics of the fourth day instead of addressing the fact that you were caught cherry-picking my...

Cherry-picking half a sentence to avoid the contradiction in your argument is a transparent tactic. My point was that you cannot label human diligence as pollution one moment and then call for a global movement, even one based on repentance, the next. Whether you call it an outside force or not...

Invoking the metaphor of a "human coin" does not resolve the contradiction; it simply avoids it. You previously labelled human effort and systems as "pollution" and "abomination" in the eyes of God. Now, you are attempting to treat them as two sides of a coin to excuse your own inconsistency...

Claiming you "said the opposite" is a remarkable bit of revisionism. You previously cited Luke 16:15 and James 1:27 to argue that human systems are an "abomination" and that one must remain "unpolluted by the world." If those systems are an abomination, then your call to pray for leaders to...

It is not a contest, but it is a matter of consistency. You have shifted from claiming that human systems and effort are "spiritual failings" to now suggesting they are only problematic if they cause "unwilling loss." That is a complete contradiction of your original point. This constant moving...

It is remarkable to see a call for world leaders to find "wisdom" when you have only just finished arguing that human wisdom and diligence are "from the Tree of Knowledge" and therefore a spiritual failing. If human systems are merely "pollution," then praying for leaders to navigate them is a...

Your "third option" is a convenient bit of circular logic. You are using your own human reasoning to argue that human reasoning is a spiritual failing. By claiming that any practical effort is "from the Tree of Knowledge," you have essentially granted yourself a licence to ignore every part of...