From a theist’s view, an atheist is simply someone "without god," following the Greek prefix a- (as in asexual or amoral). To a skeptic, however, an atheist is someone who withholds belief in deities and other unverified things like elves or demons because the burden of proof has never been met...
Agreed Kay. The point I was making is that saying aspartame as a artificial sweetener is dangerous is wrong. Yes it is artificial even if it is two natural chemicals fused together, that never fused naturally. One chemical of those two is dangerous to people with PKU. Its in real foods, meats...
Aspartame is a man-made fusion of two natural chemicals. One half is phenylalanine, which is the dangerous part, but only to people with PKU (phenylketonuria).
Aspartame is not only in canned drinks, it is also in flavoured waters and some juice drinks, chewing gum, gelatin jelly, puddings and...
There's this man-made sweetener called aspartame, used in canned diet drinks and tons of other 'sugar-free' stuff, that some people scaremonger as extremely dangerous.
The reality is much less dramatic.
Aspartame is only a genuine concern for people with phenylketonuria (PKU), a rare genetic...
Wow! That surprises me that you are here complaining about NOISE, given that you have spent the last few days creating nothing but a repetitive, contradictory racket to avoid answering for your own lack of integrity. You dismiss established theology as noise while you scramble from one thread to...
Starting yet another thread to play the part of a mystic does not hide the fact that you have fled from every previous discussion where your logic was challenged. You speak of reconnecting to life and rejecting divisiveness, yet you have spent the last few days being a dishonest interlocutor...
You are the one posing as a spiritual authority, yet you are falling back on basic Sunday School riddles to distract the group. It is quite telling that you have started a fresh thread to ponder the mechanics of the fourth day instead of addressing the fact that you were caught cherry-picking my...
Cherry-picking half a sentence to avoid the contradiction in your argument is a transparent tactic. My point was that you cannot label human diligence as pollution one moment and then call for a global movement, even one based on repentance, the next. Whether you call it an outside force or not...
Invoking the metaphor of a "human coin" does not resolve the contradiction; it simply avoids it. You previously labelled human effort and systems as "pollution" and "abomination" in the eyes of God. Now, you are attempting to treat them as two sides of a coin to excuse your own inconsistency...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.