Civil Disobedience

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

I don’t think that applies to Germans only. When I arrived here in Canada in our rural NS, the women were still used to be called “Mrs. John Smith”.
My mom said that when she was young a lot of women went to university to get their MRS degrees. They took courses that were traditional for women. I think home economics was a degree program.
 
I don’t think that applies to Germans only. When I arrived here in Canada in our rural NS, the women were still used to be called “Mrs. John Smith”.
Definitely not but it stands out historically. Now we’re seeing a backlash to authority for lots of valid reasons, too. Thinking of down south in particular.
 
Disobedience or disturbance and chaos of any kind is generally when there is a spirit of fear or anger settling over herd settings. I think of Temple Grandon's success as autistic person identifying what disturbs animals in abattoirs ... thus we think of stampedes and ghost riders in the clouds ...

Now let us shift to situations when people are emotionally distraught over a situation they don't understand. Now think of the matter that a portion of a herd has absconded with a large portion of resources because of avarice ...

If the avarice is hidden and unknown, is the unconscious response more powerful and negative. Fear is usually the most powerful aggressive faction ... especially when lies exaggerate the the level of general concern stressing out the medium of transfer ... a collective device?

Can this indeterminate be denied, or just labelled as a great unknown and used as a violent tool?

Is it philosophical rather than a theological factor ... philosophy being despised by the pious and seized?

Does conflict emerge into vision when considering the philosophical sector? Will folk just say they don't understand to avoid the complexity?
 
Last edited:
"Walk in The Woods" Civil Disobedience update.

1776454444658.png
The Supreme Court of Nova Scotia has struck down the province’s sweeping 2025 ban on entering the woods, ruling that the government acted unreasonably and failed to consider the Charter rights and values affected by the ban.

The decision follows a constitutional challenge brought by lawyers funded by the Justice Centre on behalf of Canadian Armed Forces veteran Jeffrey Evely, who was fined $28,872.50 for walking in the woods under the province’s blanket prohibition.
 
The woods are allowed the impression of a burning bush ... without common sense!

It is like the church shooting itself in the foot and driving nails in the palms ... verily disagreeable on all Counts ... counts being obstinate!
 
Back
Top