Merriam Webster:
![]()
Definition of GOD
the supreme or ultimate reality: such as; the being perfect in power, wisdom, and goodness who is worshipped (as in Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and Hinduism) as creator and ruler of the universe… See the full definitionwww.merriam-webster.com
They define what supposedly doesn’t exist. It’s not how I necessary define God but just pointing out - to your point about defining things that are real - that people have indeed really defined it in dictionaries, respectfully. It’s important to people. It doesn’t say: “some nonsense that lives in your imagination”
It’s also cultural. If you go around saying that belief in God is nonsense you’re just being divisive and it won’t accomplish anything.Better to find common ground with the beliefs/ theology that’s most compatible with your humanism, don’t you think - to connect with rather than alienate people? Because the people who hold beliefs in God that you think are imaginary are just as human as you are and your arguments aren’t likely to sway them. And holding religious beliefs is a universal human right. Human rights reflect an inclusive humanism.
Can one define such a dynamic that is like cash, or intercourse in the exchange? When thought through it comes and goes like Trumps tough suit ... corn ... that you cannot depend upon? Then is such a person indicative (semantic) of an unreachable ideal that doesn't even know the limits are beyond heh?
These things will go round and round like one of the furies: (1) Spinner (2) Weaver (3) Cutter?
Thus in the end something is cut out ... prepare for its departure ... and nothing arrives! Are we about to lose all and such leaders do not know what they can do without the sublime forms?
It all happens because we cannot gather much while in physical form ... we await the essence so we's can drift aside ... settling to conflict between "I" and "stinky" fuzzy item ... brae in tissue? Smells as it something is heated and burning ...