jimkenney12
Well-Known Member
- Pronouns
- He/Him/His
Was there an original story about the servants and the money and the bit about the unhappy subjects and command to slaughter them added to the story? How can we judge this possibility?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This seems very possible. Either Luke embellished the story or Jesus added the slaughter command himself in a subsequent telling.Was there an original story about the servants and the money and the bit about the unhappy subjects and command to slaughter them added to the story? How can we judge this possibility?
Was there an original story about the servants and the money and the bit about the unhappy subjects and command to slaughter them added to the story? How can we judge this possibility?
There is a similar parable in the non- canonical Gospel of the Hebrews ( not the Book of Hebrews)Was there an original story about the servants and the money and the bit about the unhappy subjects and command to slaughter them added to the story? How can we judge this possibility?
Some of Jesus' parables are based on the "how much more principle; e. g. the Parable of the Widow and the Unjust Judge, where the unjust judge stands for an antitype of God, and the Parable of the Friend at Midnight, where the crabby neighbor who is awakened donates the loaves just to get ride of the knocker.Some teachers and philosophers offer stories that are the opposite of what they want to support. Is it possible that offering a story like this pokes people into considering the opposite. "I hate the idea of having a ruler like this, a ruler hated by his subjects who has people murdered for opposing him. The Messiah must be a different kind of leader.". Herod and the Roman governors were like the ruler in the story.
Most of his followers were poor people. How would they have heard the story about the minahs?
Yes, and how would they have reacted to the idea that the rich will become richer? And what little they have will be taken away?Most of his followers were poor people. How would they have heard the story about the minahs?
This interpretation assumes that Jesus expected a Christian church to be established.the issue for the parable is how Jesus envisaged the christianization of synagogues.
"And He asked them, but who do you say I am?" (Mark 8:29)Imagine the consequences if there were two Jesus ... one illuminated and one in dark reflection ... profound recession?
"And He asked them, but who do you say I am?" (Mark 8:29)
Which I don't think is really the case. He was expecting the end times to be imminent. From my reading of history, the Christian Church as we know it is really the work of Paul, Peter, and other Apostles and early church leaders. And to some degree the chroniclers like the gospel writers. Jesus teaching lit the fire, but they're the ones who carried out beyond his small circle.This interpretation assumes that Jesus expected a Christian church to be established.
Agreed. I never see Jesus as having any mission other than to reform Judaism, which was largely accomplished by the destruction of the Temple in 70 CE, anyway.Which I don't think is really the case. He was expecting the end times to be imminent.
Except not even Jesus knew when the end times were....only God.Which I don't think is really the case. He was expecting the end times to be imminent. From my reading of history, the Christian Church as we know it is really the work of Paul, Peter, and other Apostles and early church leaders. And to some degree the chroniclers like the gospel writers. Jesus teaching lit the fire, but they're the ones who carried out beyond his small circle.
For sure. But it often seems that Jesus was expecting end times sooner rather than later.Except not even Jesus knew when the end times were....only God.
Matthew 24:34, "Truly I tell you, this generation will not pass away until all these things have taken place." (NRSVUE) after a lengthy discourse on the last days. That alone makes it pretty clear he did not see these as something in the far future but something imminent. I think once you strip away the whole "Son of God" mantle and look at Jesus as a preacher/prophet, he was most definitely aligned with other apocalyptic movements of the day in seeing the Roman occupation and the corruption of the Temple leadership (or at least that's how groups like the Essenes and seemingly Jesus saw it) as a sign of the Day of Judgement drawing near.Except not even Jesus knew when the end times were....only God.
So was it necessary to be crucified then?Matthew 24:34, "Truly I tell you, this generation will not pass away until all these things have taken place." (NRSVUE) after a lengthy discourse on the last days. That alone makes it pretty clear he did not see these as something in the far future but something imminent. I think once you strip away the whole "Son of God" mantle and look at Jesus as a preacher/prophet, he was most definitely aligned with other apocalyptic movements of the day in seeing the Roman occupation and the corruption of the Temple leadership (or at least that's how groups like the Essenes and seemingly Jesus saw it) as a sign of the Day of Judgement drawing near.
Jesus as community builder:Which I don't think is really the case. He was expecting the end times to be imminent. From my reading of history, the Christian Church as we know it is really the work of Paul, Peter, and other Apostles and early church leaders. And to some degree the chroniclers like the gospel writers. Jesus teaching lit the fire, but they're the ones who carried out beyond his small circle.