Random thoughts about whatever

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

I often learn/ absorb information best in the wee hours because it’s quiet, there are no other distractions or demands to keep up with. And if I don’t have to get up early, I can sleep in, it works just fine for me.

That said, my eyelids are getting heavy after reading an intellectual essay about Rage Against the Machine and American historiography. It’s pretty interesting, though.

 
On learning the following times, as latent this seems to accelerate ... and some do not like it as it indicates decelerating pas Zions ... things that went! Bum in the night ... Bohm ????

In reality so much is metaphorical it disturbs folk ... the need to be different? Perhaps mist read ...
 
I remember a conversation I had with a client about 20 years ago. He listened to music quite out of my taste. I had him bring in a couple CDs and lyrics. The lyrics were fabulous poetry and I think included social/political statements. It was a great conversation and I learned. I wish I remember the artist/group
 
I have a grand who is enamoured with the music of my youth, He loves What Did You Learn In School Today, Little boxes On The Hillside, If You Miss Me At The Back of The Bus etc.. This reminded hubby, so he has been playing them again!
 
I remember a conversation I had with a client about 20 years ago. He listened to music quite out of my taste. I had him bring in a couple CDs and lyrics. The lyrics were fabulous poetry and I think included social/political statements. It was a great conversation and I learned. I wish I remember the artist/group
Have you ever heard Disposable Heroes of HipHopracy? They were a '90's band. I listened to them for the first time around 10 years ago. Well Micheal Franti anyway, whereupon I heard hip-hop meaningful for me (since Compton is unrelatable).All about world Peace and Love.
 
This war is still newish. I try not to underestimate battle tactics. Russia soldiers losing morale? Only if they're allowed in my opinion. And those weapons being given to Ukraine are only giving Russia clear insight as to who to include as the enemy IMO.
This is a country that ended WW2.
The U.S. continuously maintains and upgrades their equipment. For decades, Russia has stockpiled weapons, the components of which were stolen and sold off by corrupt officials. The scale of the corruption is impressive. One commander sold the propellers from his ship as scrap metal. On paper, Russia has still has thousands of spare tanks. The reality is a lot of them have no engines, no turrets and may have trees growing through them. Some of the tanks sent to Ukraine are from the 50s and 60s, even though they should have plenty more T-72s from the 70s and 80s. Further, they can't supply their troops because they can't maintain air superiority and their supply convoys and depots keep spontaneously exploding.

Literally, their initial push into Ukraine was halted in part because their trucks had full tanks of gas and the soldiers thought it was just a local training exercise and they wouldn't need that much fuel, so they sold it to locals for alcohol.

This is a shitshow for Russia. The only thing they have in their back pocket is threats of nuclear weapons.

But here again, what if those weapons were as well-maintained as the rest? What happens when you try to set off a nuclear warhead that hasn't been touched in 40 years? Does anybody know?

Russia has lots of people. Cannon fodder. They won WW2 by throwing soldiers at nazis early in the war until the nazis ran out of bullets. It gave them time to develop and produce more weapons, like the T34-85 tank. Russia is no longer a leader in tank design, and now they are struggling to convince the population that they need to be the new generation of cannon fodder until they can get their act together again.

For some good, bite-sized insights into the equipment and tactics of this war, I recommend following Ryan McBeth on YouTube, especially his "Shorts". He's a former US Army veteran and very good at explaining what's going on and why. He also debunks a lot of media reports.

 
Have you ever heard Disposable Heroes of HipHopracy? They were a '90's band. I listened to them for the first time around 10 years ago. Well Micheal Franti anyway, whereupon I heard hip-hop meaningful for me (since Compton is unrelatable).All about world Peace and Love.
Nope. What Hip Hop I've heard I haven't enjoyed- I guess I like music to have a tune!
 
As in the ongoing comedy ... do tyrants need to be insecure when they consider what enemies they've made out of the foundations of their society, populace and civic construct ... other than the 2% that is busy collecting commissions?

Could there be another side of this function? Perhaps al of that in the distant abstract ... far cide of the absolute psyche? That'd be the abstract!
 
I'm informed that there are folk that do not believe in the concept of psyche ... and certainly not a sense of an abstract mined ... that's be a target of powerful denial by the excessively emotional ...
 
The U.S. continuously maintains and upgrades their equipment. For decades, Russia has stockpiled weapons, the components of which were stolen and sold off by corrupt officials. The scale of the corruption is impressive. One commander sold the propellers from his ship as scrap metal. On paper, Russia has still has thousands of spare tanks. The reality is a lot of them have no engines, no turrets and may have trees growing through them. Some of the tanks sent to Ukraine are from the 50s and 60s, even though they should have plenty more T-72s from the 70s and 80s. Further, they can't supply their troops because they can't maintain air superiority and their supply convoys and depots keep spontaneously exploding.

Literally, their initial push into Ukraine was halted in part because their trucks had full tanks of gas and the soldiers thought it was just a local training exercise and they wouldn't need that much fuel, so they sold it to locals for alcohol.

This is a s**tshow for Russia. The only thing they have in their back pocket is threats of nuclear weapons.

But here again, what if those weapons were as well-maintained as the rest? What happens when you try to set off a nuclear warhead that hasn't been touched in 40 years? Does anybody know?

Russia has lots of people. Cannon fodder. They won WW2 by throwing soldiers at nazis early in the war until the nazis ran out of bullets. It gave them time to develop and produce more weapons, like the T34-85 tank. Russia is no longer a leader in tank design, and now they are struggling to convince the population that they need to be the new generation of cannon fodder until they can get their act together again.

For some good, bite-sized insights into the equipment and tactics of this war, I recommend following Ryan McBeth on YouTube, especially his "Shorts". He's a former US Army veteran and very good at explaining what's going on and why. He also debunks a lot of media reports.

I guess they better update wikipedia on armies and equipment. Lol
Then theres the USA with, I assume, more updated equipment, and has continuously lost wars.
Is it really what equipment one has or is there an advantage to those who have to defend themselves...like Ukraine or Vietnam?
Thanks for the info. I'll check out the site.
 
Have you ever heard Disposable Heroes of HipHopracy? They were a '90's band. I listened to them for the first time around 10 years ago. Well Micheal Franti anyway, whereupon I heard hip-hop meaningful for me (since Compton is unrelatable).All about world Peace and Love.

I don't know about the band. I do know Michael Franti. We saw him at a music festival in 2018. He was amazing.
 
I guess they better update wikipedia on armies and equipment. Lol
Then theres the USA with, I assume, more updated equipment, and has continuously lost wars.
Is it really what equipment one has or is there an advantage to those who have to defend themselves...like Ukraine or Vietnam?
Thanks for the info. I'll check out the site.
It is difficult to invade and conquer another country. It's equally difficult to occupy a country that is uncooperative. They have all their population at their disposal. You have your army. They know the terrain and where they have hidden caches of weapons. You don't.

Russia needed Ukraine to not only lose fast, but to also capitulate when occupied. They did neither. The new mobilization will take weeks or months to produce low-quality and unmotivated soldiers, many of whom will surrender the first chance they get, if they don't get killed first. And winter is coming. Ukraine will suffer, but Russian soldiers will suffer more.

Putin is looking like Hitler in his bunker, sending imaginary armies into battle that are more impressive on paper than they are in real life. He's not trapped physically, but he is metaphorically. He went past the point of no return months ago.

Also, I doubt Putin really cares about Russian speakers in Donetsk and Luhansk. I think he wants the gas fields so Ukraine isn't his competition for EU gas contracts. He wants to cut Ukraine off from the Black Sea. If he could take the whole country fast, then great. Now he wants those parts as a consolation prize. Anything else is failure, and impossible to explain at home.
 
There’s a rap/ hip hop artist activist/ movie director who put out a film pre-Covid called “Sorry to Bother You” - it’s a dystopian satire in a fictional version of Oakland, about greed, union organizing, exploitation, selling out values for profits - mocks giants like Amazon and also Steve Jobs - their contributions to the capitalist military industrial complex (the “machine”). He’s probably the most far left political artist/ musician out there nowadays - musician in general with a large (indie) following - who hasn’t sold his soul to the corporate machine. Whether to sell out or not to survive and get ahead is actually the core theme of his movie. He’s extremely smart. And his music is funky, it’s not just rhyming rap. The music is cultural and I’ve been giving more music that wasn’t always my taste a chance, looking for the gifts in it - getting past feeling intimidated by just listening to it - and it opens me up to so much more depth of understanding. It’s art not just entertainment for bopping around to or pleasant vibes - sometimes art is uncomfortable. It probably should be. There’s a time and place for angry political music, and for appreciating and giving some deeper thought to why they’re making it.

Here’s an NPR article about him.



This is him at a labour union protest in 2020, where Angela Davis and Danny Glover also spoke.


Same video, extracted from the Rolling Stone article. He’s astute, gifted, and I respect him a lot. I saw the movie he made, Sorry to Bother You, with a Christian minister friend, and she loved it btw. It’s risqué but she was laughing her face off.

 
He’s a self proclaimed socialist, and sometimes says communist. He got Bill Maher riled up on his show, about it, back in the 90s. All of this has been going on - people have been trying to speak about it for years, but history is now catching up to us, all of us.
 
It is difficult to invade and conquer another country. It's equally difficult to occupy a country that is uncooperative. They have all their population at their disposal. You have your army. They know the terrain and where they have hidden caches of weapons. You don't.

Russia needed Ukraine to not only lose fast, but to also capitulate when occupied. They did neither. The new mobilization will take weeks or months to produce low-quality and unmotivated soldiers, many of whom will surrender the first chance they get, if they don't get killed first. And winter is coming. Ukraine will suffer, but Russian soldiers will suffer more.

Putin is looking like Hitler in his bunker, sending imaginary armies into battle that are more impressive on paper than they are in real life. He's not trapped physically, but he is metaphorically. He went past the point of no return months ago.

Also, I doubt Putin really cares about Russian speakers in Donetsk and Luhansk. I think he wants the gas fields so Ukraine isn't his competition for EU gas contracts. He wants to cut Ukraine off from the Black Sea. If he could take the whole country fast, then great. Now he wants those parts as a consolation prize. Anything else is failure, and impossible to explain at home.
(I wouldnt mind all of these posts being gathered into a separate thread to talk about Ukraine.)
I think you're bang on about several things especially about the fuel. I've often wondered how much Russias oil exports would be affected by the new initiatives to go electric and reduce fossil fuels. Now Europe is restarting nuclear plants, coal is once again an option for heat this coming winter and fracking that was stopped is now being set to start again. In this regard, it may not just be Putins doing to restart the need for oil products. Wouldnt be the first time countries have been in collusion to take down a smaller nation.
The other thing I've noticed is that sometimes when these wars are starting to get so much analuzed news coverage, war begins to look like an increasingly senseless way to resolve even the big issues, to the rest of us.
 
Back
Top