Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Have you read his Norse Mythology? I actually listened to the audiobook, which is read by him. Wonderful take on those stories. He was a fan of an older Norse Mythology by, I think, Roger Lancelyn Green and writing his own was kind of Gaiman's way of recapturing that magic for modern readers.It's totally what draws me to him. Showing my age, my first reading (after picture books) was a large compilation of world mythology stories, for some reason, sorted by colour. The blue book of fairy stories, the yellow book of fairy stories, etc. There were probably at least 10, and I treasured those things, borrowing them over and over again when I was restricted to the children's section.
BetteTheRed -----you said -------- on a personal note, mystic and unsafe have persuaded me to train myself out of any use of the acronym "lol", as it's never laughing with you, always laughing at you.)
I say
View attachment 5818
Have you read his Norse Mythology? I actually listened to the audiobook, which is read by him. Wonderful take on those stories. He was a fan of an older Norse Mythology by, I think, Roger Lancelyn Green and writing his own was kind of Gaiman's way of recapturing that magic for modern readers.
You and unsafe can LOL to your hearts' content. Your scorn will change nothing. Reality and truth will not bend to fit your limited perceptions.
By the way, are they flocking back to YOUR denomination?Yes
Yes! Because we understand the need to make society relevant to the Gospel rather than vice versa!
First off I'm not UCCan but it's not an insult to me.UCCans like you and Jim Kenney illustrate the typical UCCan ploy of ignoring Jesus' well established self-understanding to simplistically invent a progressive Jesus to suit their denominational agenda. They have no basis for challenging the authenticity of Mark 10:45, which of course derives compelling support from other well established sayings of Jesus.
Lame attempts to find common ground among religions and build a spirituality based on parallelomania is scorned by historians of religion because this ploy distorts the distinctiveness of each religion and betrays a superficial grasp of them. Indeed, this thread displays profound ignorance of the actual biblical basis for an irenic perspective on other religions, an ignorance betrayed by the frequent disdain here for proof-texting that is required to demonstrate competence. As Bible text critic, B. F. Wescott famously said, "The simple Gospel is not so simple as the simple would have you suppose." My Princeton philosophy professor put the Christian's task succinctly: "Our job is not to make the Gospel relevant to society, but to make society
relevant to the Gospel."
t
ort
i
Didnt realize it was a competition between churches....Yes! Because we understand the need to make society relevant to the Gospel rather than vice versa!
Didnt realize it was a competition between churches....
First off I'm not UCCan but it's not an insult to me.
I hope you know I was defending and not putting the United church down.I thought you were not. And I don't get throwing around "UCCan" as if it were some kind of generic insult. I don't see any intersections between my faith and that of RevJohn's (just for an example, because he's the most different in theology, I would think, to me), so what the "offending" beliefs are is a mystery?
I will start a new thread entitled "The Rationality of Jesus' Atonement" in which I will explain the prophetic perspective of sacrifice and the Jewish background of Jesus' "ransom" theology and self-understanding. The ultimate result is the well known wordplayFirst off I'm not UCCan but it's not an insult to me.
So which belief of the atonement do you think Mark was following in the 1st century? Because what I've read, not many at that time were seeing it the same way that we see it now.
Doesn't John's Gospel tell us that God so loved the world that God sent God's Son, not to condemn it but to save it? Did God not look at all of creation in the beginning and see that it was good? How can you be so dismissive of what GOD has created, what GOD sees as good, what GOD is still actively engaged in trying to make better? Seems to me God hasn't given up on the world yet. Why have you?Christianity gives people nothing in today's world -----Christianity is just a man made and man driven Religion ---it hasn't got the authority or the ability to do crap for people -----it is like every other Religion --it is a dead Faith Religion ---it has nothing to offer people ---it needs to be done away with as do all Religions -----in my view
Take Christ out of the word and all it is --is ianity which is not even a word -----and Christ has been taken out of the word today big time ----It use to be the focus of the word but not anymore -----it is just a haphazard word today meaning all kinds of twisted things -----very sad but true -----