'Saved FROM What?' or "'Saved FOR What?'? What Is Salvation, Anywho?

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

revjohn: "Saved from what? From ourselves mostly I expect. All have sinned and all have fallen short. So we need help and grace is that help."

There is a big difference between the benefits of transformative salvation and the OP's more basic question of what we are saved from.
Paul and James would answer that we are saved from postmortem wrath--ie. postmortem separation from God variously expressed biblically as consignment to Hell, spiritual death, or "destruction," perhaps in the sense of soul annihilation.

"Much more surely then, now that we have been justified by His blood, we will be saved from wrath through Him (Romans 5:9)."
"Whoever brings back a sinner from wandering will save a soul from death and will cover a multitude of sins (James 5:20)."

To duck this point and pander to a progressive agenda by concocting a psychological existential view of salvation is to move in the direction of a cultic mentality divorced from biblical anchorage. Yes. the doctrine of a punitive postmortem fate is problematic for many moderns. But we should either come clean and either explicitly reject this biblical teaching or explore the possibility of some biblical form of universal salvation.
As C. S. Lewis famously and pithily said, "The gates of Hell are locked from the inside."

revjohn: "Saved for what? For God."

True, but too vague! Redbaron should be applauded for posting this generally ignored question. Paul, of course, teaches that we are saved by grace through faith. What gets overlooked is the implication that Christians must then strive to live grace-based lives--lives that constantly express gratitude for God's unconditional acceptance and forgiveness: "Give thanks in all circumstances (1 Thess. 5:17)."
This means I must serve others out of a sense of privilege to be used by God, not out of a dry sense of duty that might collect applause in my mind for putting up with the shortcomings of others.

All respected Bible scholars would agree that the posted article reveals a simple-minded ignorance of both Paul's Gospel and "Gnostic individualism." I will express that critique in my next planned post.
 
If conscience is saved ... where are these collected and preserved? All in the deluded and destroyed mind as exploited in passions ... to the point of implosion and collective formations ... collective UN conscience as it goes out ... some amber must be retained ... the yellow part that recesses ... as a hated thought!

Mankind does despise intellect ... or so it appears as not to be ... i.e. incarnate! It collapsed as mire ... dirty fallacy? Another poorly understood word in the great agenda of "not knowing"! Thus collectively we don't ...
 
Saved from what ? ---- from God's rightful Judgment and wrath that all Humans deserve for our disobedience and thinking we are all that that we don't need a Saviour -----and saved from enduring the horrible 7 year Tribulation that is coming to destroy this earth when God is ready to make His move to do so ----

People trying to save this planet is futile ------it will be destroyed in the end ------according to scripture and a new earth will come forth ---


read here if interested
The Events of the Tribulation Period
https://bible.org/illustration/events-tribulation-period
 
Our origin was in the natural order. We journeyed along the way of life. At some point we turned aside and entered the way of death. That being the way of self determination eclipsing the harmony of life in the natural order. All along that decadent way we have opportunity to turn back to the way of life. Some embrace that opportunity. Others do not.
 
The posted article displays an appalling biblical illiteracy. Paul makes it clear that the Gospel is entirely individualistic in the sense that at core it is the message that Christ died for the sins of all individuals and rose again to guarantee the effectiveness of His atoning death:

"Now, brothers and sisters, I want to remind you of the gospel I preached to you, which you received and on which you have taken your stand. 2By this gospel you are saved, if you hold firmly to the word I preached to you. Otherwise, you have believed in vain. 3For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures, and that He was buried, and that He was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures (1 Corinthians 15:1-4).

Because it is through the Gospel that "we are saved from wrath" and "have received [individual] reconciliation" (Romans 5:9, 11), the posted article's lame attempt to reinterpret our "ministry of reconciliation (2 Corinthians 5:20)" in broader terms is specious eisegesis acceptable to no scholarly Bible commentary. That's why the focus of Paul's initial missionary preaching is exclusively Christ crucified:

"1When I came to you, I did not come with eloquence or human wisdom as I proclaimed to you the testimony about God. 2For I resolved to now nothing among you except Jesus Christ, and Him crucified. And I came to you in weakness with great fear and trembling. 4My message and my preaching were not with wise and persuasive words, but with a demonstration of the Spirit's power, 5so that your faith might not rest on human wisdom, but on God's power (1 Corinthians 2:1-5)."

But other versions of the Gospel are permissible, right? Wrong, according to Galatians 1:9:
"As we have said before, so now we repeat, if anyone proclaims to you a gospel contrary to what you have received, let that one be accursed!"
 
Last edited:
Possibly she knew sacred things as hidden wisdom ... an ancient mother enigma! How did mother's know how to do these things? Well some mothers ...

Let's not dis fathers here, either. There's nothing magical, or indeed "maternal" about gender.
 
Let's not dis fathers here, either. There's nothing magical, or indeed "maternal" about gender.

Dis mothers or fathers that aren't there when there are needy children ...

I had neither and thus never learned anything in life according to some great priests of the Golden Rule that appeared to collapse and implode in their teaching ... so I turned about and took stock of life myself ... as an wonderfully and independently made genre without physical baggage.

Some ministers, etc. even suggest that I am nothing in their essence ... they just can't see that they contribute to my humility ...

It like the downs, or one of those plotted depressions on the Kubler Ross Graphic ... tis warped as the psyche turns about on itself ...

Tis ruagh being shaped up like a bentwood chair ... gamos thrones ... once just a log in the woods ... you could hang you buns on ... or the hind of your beef ... nothing remains but the fecundity ... another natural cycle!

The genre is mire essence ... a kind of od-dheur in the woods ... stinking myths?
 
Let's not dis fathers here, either. There's nothing magical, or indeed "maternal" about gender.
Agreed. What do you think about generations of women repressed by Western structures of patriarchy and the silence of most men in the face of it?
 
So why dis 'our Father' who art in Heaven?

I like to hear a wide variety of translations of the prayer of Jesus. Growing up knowing/hearing/saying only the very patriarchal "Our Father" version really limits one's vision of Godde into a very narrow point that is not much help to humanity, particularly women. My favourite starts: Eternal Spirit: Earth-Maker, Pain-bearer, Life-giver, source of all that is and that shall be, Father and Mother of us all.
 
Such pat answers may come from the monarchs of the higher LANs ... celtic blarney on the casting of snakes under the power thereof ...

Difficult squirms ...
 
Is character an active attribute of development of alternate emotional-intelligence? That would double up the path eh Boyce (people as boid up)? Resembles floaters in the face of Eire wandering in Lil'Putin ... when gnomes dream of absolute power ...

Gnomes may hide in a forest 've Lei Sa'! The Shadow signs off ...
 
I like to hear a wide variety of translations of the prayer of Jesus. Growing up knowing/hearing/saying only the very patriarchal "Our Father" version really limits one's vision of Godde into a very narrow point that is not much help to humanity, particularly women. My favourite starts: Eternal Spirit: Earth-Maker, Pain-bearer, Life-giver, source of all that is and that shall be, Father and Mother of us all.
Lately my favorite starts: Hi Mom ....
 
Saved from nothingness. Saved from meaninglessness. To contribute positive energy to the momentum of positive human endeavour (now and into the distant future). Momentum has direction. Energy is indestructible (and is therefore eternal).
 
Back
Top