TRUMP - Some people think......... How do you feel?

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Except they took too long...they elected him, while most of the rest of the world saw this potentially happening. They should've invoked the 25th amendment 3 yrs ago. But, I suppose Pence being potentially worse (worse and smarter) was his "insurance policy". That reminds me...Guliani. Why are Americans tolerating the fact that he, non elected personal lawyer to Trump, was brokering these meetings with foreign governments and such - acting as a defacto Secretary of State (shadow government - uhm, hello? I thought the right had a serious problem with shadow government...but not where Guliani's concerned) ?

Chansen's right. You can't make this stuff up. It's stunning. There's no point in Hollywood making a political thriller/ drama about corruption in Washington because we're getting a daily soap opera already. And, not for several years after Trump is gone...because everybody's too tired of it.

Are we not all immersed in the power of corruption ... as we approach Easter and the great loss of light and Levite! Brilliant thoughts are dulled by politix! Power of emotions overwhelms ... then some have no choice due to overwhelming fear and anger of demos.

What is demo? De vile questions ... yet it is biblical! Can folk that don't read the NU's ... dictate all about the understanding thereof?

De tailing ... what most don't follow upon ... up on a capital stance! Disestablishmentarian is a form of dissonance against the alternate institution to allow conflicting points ... sorts of maas ess.
 
Fore boden about the hunter? No Good Will found in that search ... must be beyond us yet!

Rest well with what remains ... a broken and scattered world ... our onus! Rhonas as roils on ...
 
Someone needs to ask writer/ director (The Spanish Prisoner, Glengarry Glen Ross, etc.) what he thinks Trump is up to. Maybe he should've been consulted a few years ago. He could probably get inside Trump's head and do a better analysis than anyone...except he appears to like Trump's cunning and brash character. I suppose it's most amusing to those who are insulated by wealth and never have to fear the fallout from his policies.
 
Last edited:
Tanks ... sunk vessels ... a' moured to cause war!

Divising outbreaks ... divining?

Do isolated developments loose connections ... character attributes!
 
Be radical use irrational words that appeal to madden groups ... only the reasoned will get it! Thus untrumped over the idea that Trump's Policies won;t affect them. Power has this avarice attribute ... that it must control the in Tyre thingy ... and roll on ...
 
The most recent Gallup poll conducted after the impeachment hearings and senate votes found the Trump's approval ratings (49%) to be at an all-time high for his presidency--up 10 points and higher than Obama's approval rating at the same period. Votes for him during the Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire primary broke all-time records. Many pundits are predicting a landslide victory for him in November. Why is this happening?
(1) Well, the US economy has never been better and that, though he constantly plays fast and loose with the truth, he strives to keep his campaign promises more than any president in modern history.
(2) There are so many tapes in which Schiff, Nadler, and Pelosi, are shown contradicting their current rhetoric and sounding like the Republican Trump defenders during the Clinton impeachment efforts.
(3) The Democratic governing philosophy is widely preceived as "Don't legislate; litigate" and they are blamed as a do-nothing congress.

So what is my own political attitude? Trump deserves much of the criticism directed at him, but the Dems are far worse. I have never voted for a Republican president before, but I will hold my nose and vote for Trump's reelection this Fall.
 
In the entire conception of doing what is best for the greater western (American) good ... who exhibits the strongest contraries? It is enough for flipping out reality in favour of a mental fantasy! Thus dreams are set adrift as wind rift ... pseudo breezes with ode I-US fractures!
 
So what is my own political attitude? Trump deserves much of the criticism directed at him, but the Dems are far worse. I have never voted for a Republican president before, but I will hold my nose and vote for Trump's reelection this Fall.


This kind of thinking frustrates me. How can the Dems be worse? People said they despised Hillary, yet were fine with crap T did.

Help me to understand, how specifically are the Dems worse?
 
Just two words: "strong women".

Wait. You don't think it was strong when Susan Collins said "I think Donald was a very bad boy but I'll vote to acquit him because I'm sure he's learned his lesson and he won't do it again."

I don't agree that the Democrats are worse, but I do think Trump stands a very good chance of being re-elected, just based on his competition. Sanders and Warren probably can't win because they're too far "left." Single payer health care and free college tuition just won't fly in the US. Buttigieg probably can't win because he's gay. Biden's run for president twice and both times failed to even come close to the Democratic nomination. The only reason he's taken seriously now is because Obama picked him for VP. That leaves Bloomberg and Klobuchar. Klobuchar did well in Iowa and especially New Hampshire but whether she has the ground organization and the money to compete in the bigger states (and especially Super Tuesday) is doubtful. So that leaves Bloomberg. He's interesting. He certainly has the resources to compete with Trump. As a commentator said this morning "Bloomberg can buy and sell Trump." He has the ability to get under Trump's skin. Their tweet war this morning showed that. And of all the Democratic candidates I think Bloomberg is probably the one who unnerves Trump the most because he is richer and more successful and moves in the right circles that Donald wants to move in but where he's really not accepted. In the tweet war Bloomberg must have infuriated Trump when he said (probably rightly) that they know all the same people in New York City and that those people all laugh at Trump when he's not there. Some are saying that Bloomberg's decision to engage Trump on Twitter was undignified but I think he's positioning himself as the guy with the money and the will to go toe to toe with him, while all the other Democrats are fighting amongst themselves. Bloomberg has some momentum right now. It will be interesting to see if it lasts up to Super Tuesday on March 3, I believe. Whether it's really a good thing to have another billionaire president is a question - but sometimes you have to fight fire with fire, and at least Bloomberg seems competent. By all accounts he was a decent Mayor of New York City, he's never declared bankruptcy and he's never bragged about sexually assaulting women. That puts him way ahead of Trump right there.

I think a Democratic ticket of Bloomberg-Klobuchar is a real possibility.
 
No, that wasn't very strong of Susan Collins. But there are strong women in the democratic race. I don't like Klobichar though. She's wonky, I heard she's a terrible boss (throwing office supplies at staff), and she cannot beat Trump. Only someone with populist style, on the left, can beat him.

And...Bernie can and most likely will win. I think you're wrong about him.

It's interesting how the MSM is playing up Klobichar coming in third, Pete coming in second...and completely missing that Bernie is winning right now.
 
Back
Top