The Gospel of Mark

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Ghosts and those German Twins write on ... poled Ur geists ...

Such is the word ... hoard Able ... some prescience is respected ...
 
Does the story have a different message if we don't believe it literally happened?

In other words, is it important to distinguish between historical accounts and mythology/ parable in the gospels? Some, like Marcus Borg, have argued that greater depth of meaning is possible with metaphorical understandings of Scripture.

Could God have given the same message using a parable? Sure, I believe he could have - God can do anything.

Some day Jesus is going to judge millions of people. A large herd of pigs is nothing.
 
paradox3 ---your quote ----- The demons wished to enter the swine in this story so maybe they did not like being who they were.

unsafe says ----more likely they knew Jesus could sent them all to Hell and they would be out of the way of mankind so they ask to be sent into the pigs so they could still be present in this world to possess another soul ------You see spirits don't die so the pigs would die when they went over the cliff which would release the spirits back into this world ------


human_spirit_ghost.jpg
 
paradox3 ---your quote ----- The demons wished to enter the swine in this story so maybe they did not like being who they were.

unsafe says ----more likely they knew Jesus could sent them all to Hell and they would be out of the way of mankind so they ask to be sent into the pigs so they could still be present in this world to possess another soul ------You see spirits don't die so the pigs would die when they went over the cliff which would release the spirits back into this world ------


human_spirit_ghost.jpg
If you are correct, unsafe, we are dealing with very sneaky demons here!
 
Could God have given the same message using a parable? Sure, I believe he could have - God can do anything.

Some day Jesus is going to judge millions of people. A large herd of pigs is nothing.
But here is my question. Does it make any difference if this story is a parable or historically accurate?
 
But here is my question. Does it make any difference if this story is a parable or historically accurate?

My answer: It does because if it is historically accurate, one starts questioning what really happened. Were there really demons? Did the pigs stampede for some natural reason that got explained as "demons"? Where the hell did that many pigs come from anyway? And so on. The facts become the focus.

If it is a parable, we can dispense with all that and cut right to what the story means. What was being taught here?
 
My answer: It does because if it is historically accurate, one starts questioning what really happened. Were there really demons? Did the pigs stampede for some natural reason that got explained as "demons"? Where the hell did that many pigs come from anyway? And so on. The facts become the focus.

If it is a parable, we can dispense with all that and cut right to what the story means. What was being taught here?
This gets back to Marcus Borg . . . the idea that metaphorical understandings of scripture are richer than literal interpretations.
 
So why is it so important to you to believe this (and other stories) literally happened?

It just is. I believe that the Spirit of God has given me trust in these things being accurate accounts. I could turn the question around - why do you and others here doubt so much that they are accurate accounts?
 
This gets back to Marcus Borg . . . the idea that metaphorical understandings of scripture are richer than literal interpretations.

Reading the Bible Again for the First Time is on my shelf. ;)

Even used some of it in UU sermon on scripture (the second time I gave it, hadn't read the book yet the first time).
 
Reading the Bible Again for the First Time is on my shelf. ;)

Even used some of it in UU sermon on scripture (the second time I gave it, hadn't read the book yet the first time).
The one which really spoke to me was Heart of Christianity.
 
As I read through the gospels for this WC2 study, I am not especially focused on whether the stories are literally true or metaphor. I am approaching them with a willing suspension of disbelief, I would say. At times I am finding myself quite cynical about the narratives but at other times I am experiencing a deepened sense of faith.

This is a most interesting exercise. On a few occasions I have become very aware of my liberal bias in reading scripture. . . most often when the text does not seem to support some of my ideas. My view of Jesus is changing somewhat.

It is great to have a variety of perspectives here in our discussion.
 
You still haven't explained why you find literal interpretations of stories like the demon-possessed pigs more meaningful.

Well, as I've shared - I believe God could have given the same message using parable. However, I trust that the accounts in the Bible are accurate - that when something is meant to be a parable it is identified as such. I will also echo what you've said - the Spirit of God guides me to use reason, perhaps.
 
Well, as I've shared - I believe God could have given the same message using parable. However, I trust that the accounts in the Bible are accurate - that when something is meant to be a parable it is identified as such. I will also echo what you've said - the Spirit of God guides me to use reason, perhaps.
Yes, it is curious that the gospels do not always identify parable.

But I still don't think you have answered my question. Let me try it another way. What is added to the story by believing it is literally true?
 
Yes, it is curious that the gospels do not always identify parable.

But I still don't think you have answered my question. Let me try it another way. What is added to the story by believing it is literally true?

Perhaps a real sense of God's power and love. I want to know the God I'm in relationship with, and to know God truly and more fully. That there are true accounts of how God has worked in the past gives assurance that God can still work in powerful, loving ways today.
 
Perhaps a real sense of God's power and love. I want to know the God I'm in relationship with, and to know God truly and more fully. That there are true accounts of how God has worked in the past gives assurance that God can still work in powerful, loving ways today.
Okay, I am starting to see where you are coming from. The miraculous healings by Jesus, the walking on water, the feeding of the 5000 and so on are more powerful when taken literally?
 
Back
Top