TRUMP - Some people think......... How do you feel?

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

What is it telling about, in my case? It was more rhetorical because even if I had an answer I have no power.

Thus lesser people are under powered regarding the trend to corruption! All they have to do is cannibalize the waste of those representing higher gamma ... hidden wisdom in bringing down vain wisdom 'eirosc-amma or helter skelter as chaos goes!

Thus logical fallacy ... and we learn from the leavings of those ahead ... a sloe process of djinns as you can't really say critical stuff ... you could lose your head atae party!

Thus large alien words as god attempting to force you to think about understanding greatest dark things ... obscure POTUS ess ... what a po'ess on that ...
 
Last edited:
It's telling that you have to ask that question.....seems world leaders don't bother to dig that deeply for answers to that question either.

What is it telling about, in my case? It was more rhetorical because even if I had an answer I have no power.

Accepting the truth could set us free ...

  • Real power is unelected
  • Politicians change, but the power structure does not.
  • A global financial elite power structure operates behind the scenes for its own benefit
  • It is a Network composed of individuals who prefer anonymity.
  • They are "satisfied to possess the reality rather than the appearance of power."
  • This approach of secretly exercising power is common throughout history because it protects the conspirators from the consequences of their actions.
  • A primary tactic for directing public opinion and "government" policy is to place willing servants in leadership positions of trusted institutions (media, universities, government, foundations, etc.).
  • If there is ever a major backlash against a given policy, the servant can be replaced.
  • This leaves both the institution and the individuals who actually direct its power unharmed.
  • Historically, those who establish sophisticated systems of domination are not only highly intelligent; they are supremely deceptive and ruthless.
  • They completely ignore the ethical barriers that govern a normal human being's behavior.
  • They do not believe that the moral and legislative laws, which others are expected to abide by, apply to them.
  • This gives them an enormous advantage over the masses that cannot easily imagine their mind-set.
  • Advances in technology have enabled modern rulers to dominate larger and larger areas of the globe.
  • As a result, the substance of national sovereignty has already been destroyed, and whatever remains of its shell is being dismantled as quickly as possible.
  • The new system they're building (which they themselves refer to as a New World Order), will trade the existing illusion of democratically directed government for their long-sought, "expert-directed," authoritarian technocracy."
Source: Joseph Plummer, 2014

.... to start to stop complying with these powers that should not be !
 



Accepting the truth could set us free ...

  • Real power is unelected
  • Politicians change, but the power structure does not.
  • A global financial elite power structure operates behind the scenes for its own benefit
  • It is a Network composed of individuals who prefer anonymity.
  • They are "satisfied to possess the reality rather than the appearance of power."
  • This approach of secretly exercising power is common throughout history because it protects the conspirators from the consequences of their actions.
  • A primary tactic for directing public opinion and "government" policy is to place willing servants in leadership positions of trusted institutions (media, universities, government, foundations, etc.).
  • If there is ever a major backlash against a given policy, the servant can be replaced.
  • This leaves both the institution and the individuals who actually direct its power unharmed.
  • Historically, those who establish sophisticated systems of domination are not only highly intelligent; they are supremely deceptive and ruthless.
  • They completely ignore the ethical barriers that govern a normal human being's behavior.
  • They do not believe that the moral and legislative laws, which others are expected to abide by, apply to them.
  • This gives them an enormous advantage over the masses that cannot easily imagine their mind-set.
  • Advances in technology have enabled modern rulers to dominate larger and larger areas of the globe.
  • As a result, the substance of national sovereignty has already been destroyed, and whatever remains of its shell is being dismantled as quickly as possible.
  • The new system they're building (which they themselves refer to as a New World Order), will trade the existing illusion of democratically directed government for their long-sought, "expert-directed," authoritarian technocracy."
Source: Joseph Plummer, 2014

.... to start to stop complying with these powers that should not be !

This cannot be for it would be labelled occult ... or filmy noire as those veils go ...
 
That looks like a list of problems not solutions.

These solutions were always used by powers that were not demos pragmatic for all of creation ... the individualization of free wile for personal advantage as counter to God ... the distributed knowledge ... demos akin to of metaphoric to democracy as despised by totalitarian powers ... on the alternate side of a greater mind is a reciprocal thought ... like a dark mire or MIR thingy!
 



Accepting the truth could set us free ...

  • Real power is unelected
  • Politicians change, but the power structure does not.
  • A global financial elite power structure operates behind the scenes for its own benefit
  • It is a Network composed of individuals who prefer anonymity.
  • They are "satisfied to possess the reality rather than the appearance of power."
  • This approach of secretly exercising power is common throughout history because it protects the conspirators from the consequences of their actions.
  • A primary tactic for directing public opinion and "government" policy is to place willing servants in leadership positions of trusted institutions (media, universities, government, foundations, etc.).
  • If there is ever a major backlash against a given policy, the servant can be replaced.
  • This leaves both the institution and the individuals who actually direct its power unharmed.
  • Historically, those who establish sophisticated systems of domination are not only highly intelligent; they are supremely deceptive and ruthless.
  • They completely ignore the ethical barriers that govern a normal human being's behavior.
  • They do not believe that the moral and legislative laws, which others are expected to abide by, apply to them.
  • This gives them an enormous advantage over the masses that cannot easily imagine their mind-set.
  • Advances in technology have enabled modern rulers to dominate larger and larger areas of the globe.
  • As a result, the substance of national sovereignty has already been destroyed, and whatever remains of its shell is being dismantled as quickly as possible.
  • The new system they're building (which they themselves refer to as a New World Order), will trade the existing illusion of democratically directed government for their long-sought, "expert-directed," authoritarian technocracy."
Source: Joseph Plummer, 2014

.... to start to stop complying with these powers that should not be !
And there will be no violence? (And nobody has ever tried to do that, or if so, there was no violence?)

As per Syria and Russia...authoritarian tyranny in the east is better than authoritarian technocracy in the west, so just leave it be?
 
I've spent a lot of time researching this one. What we a watching is a massive (and lying) propaganda campaign with all the news media, including CBC, bowing their heads and saying, yes. massa.

As well, the biggest user of chemical weapons and the biggest killer of civilians and children over the last 70 years has been the USA. But Far.

The evidence is there an reliable. But our news media aren't touching it.

And this one is not a small issue. This is one step from Armageddon.
 
What is it telling about, in my case? It was more rhetorical because even if I had an answer I have no power. And none of us started this. We are not responsible for the original seeds of the war machine, the MIC, and the high level decisions. The leaders are.

It seems like neither doing something, nor doing nothing, will have good outcomes.
I suppose we as Christians have given away much of our power. In some ways I see the early churches seizing that power to bring about change but eventually, overtime buckling beneath that governmental power by being allowed to practice christianity as long as it's influence does not deter governments with a military agenda. Christians are numbered in the billions and would truly be a powerful force for change if we concentrated in promoting a humane agenda that could address and influence the thinking of the world for the good, but alas I think as churches we tend to separate ourselves as such a force that only exists on the periphery of world problems. A place for solace when s**t happens, rather than be confrontational in the way Jesus may have been with a choice on the side of loving humanity to be considered, when killing others seems to be the only option.
But I believe you're right as far as being individuals effective on their own....our thoughts and prayers are only effective for the grounding of those ideas and to solidify the thinking, but it would take a collective involvement and a Messiah to lead us probably.
 
but it would take a collective involvement and a Messiah to lead us probably.

Which might look something like this ...
  • Obedience to Jesus Christ, that the church is called to confess, witness and act, even though the authorities and human law might forbid them, and punishment and suffering be the consequence (Acts 4.18ff).
The Accra Confession

And here is another option ...

Nothing left to do
When you know that you've been taken
Nothing left to do
When you're begging for a crumb
Nothing left to do
When you've got to go on waiting
Waiting for the miracle to come
When you've fallen on the highway
And you're lying in the rain,
And they ask you how you're doing
Of course you'll say you can't complain
If you're squeezed for information,
That's when you've got to play it dumb
You just say you're out there waiting
For the miracle, for the miracle to come ...
 
I suppose we as Christians have given away much of our power. In some ways I see the early churches seizing that power to bring about change but eventually, overtime buckling beneath that governmental power by being allowed to practice christianity as long as it's influence does not deter governments with a military agenda. Christians are numbered in the billions and would truly be a powerful force for change if we concentrated in promoting a humane agenda that could address and influence the thinking of the world for the good, but alas I think as churches we tend to separate ourselves as such a force that only exists on the periphery of world problems. A place for solace when s**t happens, rather than be confrontational in the way Jesus may have been with a choice on the side of loving humanity to be considered, when killing others seems to be the only option.
But I believe you're right as far as being individuals effective on their own....our thoughts and prayers are only effective for the grounding of those ideas and to solidify the thinking, but it would take a collective involvement and a Messiah to lead us probably.
I agree.
 
Except I never really had power to give away. What about we Christians who already are almost on the margins. What are we supposed to do?

Tonight, on my way to a church event across town, I stopped at Tim's, and was talking to a young homeless guy outside. Nicest guy. I didn't ask what he'd done - he asked about my leg, and told me he has epilepsy and is scared of breaking bones if he falls. He told me he had been in and out of city jail over the weekend and the cops were keeping his seizure medication in the personal belongings lockup until Monday, when somebody's there to open the locker. I didn't ask what he'd done. Maybe it was for panhandling. This city is uptight about street folks! Could've been for a minor disturbance. He seemed very friendly to me. Anyway...He couldn't get a refill for free because med refills are not covered until the last ones run out, and an emergency couple of doses is half the cost of a refill, because of the dispensing fee, and he didn't have it. He had a cough - said he's coughing up green stuff - he thought was an infection that needed antibiotics, pneumonia maybe. He said he went to the hospital last week and they told him it didn't need treatment. I was trying to think of how to help - I'm only ever a few weeks away from where he's at really - I may not look like it but I am. I learned that in Vancouver. Anyway, I suggested he go back to the hospital, and tell them his cough isn't getting better and needs to be treated, and while he's at it, ask if he can have his epilepsy meds at the hospital. I don't know whether he'll try that or not.

When I left I thought that I should've asked him to come and listen to Shane Claiborne. I missed the chance. Thought of it later. I always seem to think of good ideas in hindsight that might've helped. There might've been a lot of people motivated to help him out, with what I can't do. I blew it. What can I do, as a good Christian witness, with not much to give?
 
Last edited:
Except I never really had power to give away. What about we Christians who already are almost on the margins. What are we supposed to do?

Tonight, on my way to a church event across town, I stopped at Tim's, and was talking to a young homeless guy outside. Nicest guy. I didn't ask what he'd done - he asked about my leg, and told me he has epilepsy and is scared of breaking bones if he falls. He told me he had been in and out of city jail over the weekend and the cops were keeping his seizure medication in the personal belongings lockup until Monday, when somebody's there to open the locker. I didn't ask what he'd done. Maybe it was for panhandling. This city is uptight about street folks! Could've been for a minor disturbance. He seemed very friendly to me. Anyway...He couldn't get a refill for free because med refills are not covered until the last ones run out, and an emergency couple of doses is half the cost of a refill, because of the dispensing fee, and he didn't have it. He had a cough - said he's coughing up green stuff - he thought was an infection that needed antibiotics, pneumonia maybe. He said he went to the hospital last week and they told him it didn't need treatment. I was trying to think of how to help - I'm only ever a few weeks away from where he's at really - I may not look like it but I am. I learned that in Vancouver. Anyway, I suggested he go back to the hospital, and tell them his cough isn't getting better and needs to be treated, and while he's at it, ask if he can have his epilepsy meds at the hospital. I don't know whether he'll try that or not.

When I left I thought that I should've asked him to come and listen to Shane Claiborne. I missed the chance. Thought of it later. I always seem to think of good ideas in hindsight that might've helped. There might've been a lot of people motivated to help him out, with what I can't do. I blew it. What can I do, as a good Christian witness, with not much to give?

Lets see ... you stopped and talked ... did not judge ... empathized ... recognized that you and he were pretty much the same on the marginalized scale ... thought of helping more than rushing away to a 'church event' ... offered the best suggestions you could think of in the moment ... and in hindsight felt that you had not done enough? I would call that about as good a christian witness as it gets!
 
I suppose we as Christians have given away much of our power. In some ways I see the early churches seizing that power to bring about change but eventually, overtime buckling beneath that governmental power by being allowed to practice christianity as long as it's influence does not deter governments with a military agenda. Christians are numbered in the billions and would truly be a powerful force for change if we concentrated in promoting a humane agenda that could address and influence the thinking of the world for the good, but alas I think as churches we tend to separate ourselves as such a force that only exists on the periphery of world problems. A place for solace when s**t happens, rather than be confrontational in the way Jesus may have been with a choice on the side of loving humanity to be considered, when killing others seems to be the only option.
But I believe you're right as far as being individuals effective on their own....our thoughts and prayers are only effective for the grounding of those ideas and to solidify the thinking, but it would take a collective involvement and a Messiah to lead us probably.
i think that if people r serious aboot this that they have 2 b willing to take the consequences including possible jail time?
 
Lets see ... you stopped and talked ... did not judge ... empathized ... recognized that you and he were pretty much the same on the marginalized scale ... thought of helping more than rushing away to a 'church event' ... offered the best suggestions you could think of in the moment ... and in hindsight felt that you had not done enough? I would call that about as good a christian witness as it gets!
Thank you.
 
Back
Top