Pavlos Maros said:However you cannot claim that christianity loves it neighbour. Because clearly it doesn't. Christianity is after all following jesus christ's lead.
You're... suggesting that Jesus isn't loving?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pavlos Maros said:However you cannot claim that christianity loves it neighbour. Because clearly it doesn't. Christianity is after all following jesus christ's lead.
You are arguing from a very narrow, almost ideological, position about churches, that you insist on continuing to believe is the correct premise that applies to all of Christianity. You are not well informed about it. Maybe you've been brainwashed.
Christianity itself doesn't love or not love it's neighbour. Christianity teaches love of neighbour. Not all people who claim to be christians fully understand and are able to follow that teaching.
You claim 'Christianity is following Jesus Christ's lead.' I am having trouble following you here. Jesus taught love of neighbour. What is more he illustrated love of neighbour by the way he lived his life -- humble, forgiving, compassionate, merciful, challenging the system, identifying with the outcast. If people follow his lead wouldn't they also be loving of neighbour?
Who is claiming that christianity is all pure and lovely? Not me. Christianiy is a belief system. It is made up of imperfect individuals. It is sometimes misunderstood and/or misinterpreted. And people fall short of their ideals. And all too often peeople jump on the bandwagon and use it for their advantage. It is not the fault of the BS when people fail to live up to its ideals or abuse it for their own interests.
He may not want to be.
Oh man, Mendalla. How long have we known each other online and yet you chose to take my comment seriously?!![]()
You're... suggesting that Jesus isn't loving?
Inn sin sear Christian? Delight is akin to that makes its mark if you get too much ... you are no Moor ... A'Moor is meta science ... a parallel understanding to what Leis here ... that people say is virtue ... ongoing unknown!
Do you for a second actually think that I'd ever seriously suggest that the UCCanada is more intelligent than are we Baptists? Serious scholarship goes on associated with each of said traditions.
No Regardless of him merely being a character in a book. It was poorly worded Jae I should have wrote. "Christianity should after all follow Jesus christ's lead". He is narrating Leviticus 19:9-18 after all. My bad.
You're... suggesting that Jesus isn't loving?
No Regardless of him merely being a character in a book. It was poorly worded Jae I should have wrote. "Christianity should after all follow Jesus christ's lead". He is narrating Leviticus 19:9-18 after all. My bad.
And that is exactly what I've been saying. And now. Lol. You are going to envoke the not true scotsman fallacy ok.Christianity teaches love of neighbour. Not all people who claim to be christians fully understand and are able to follow that teaching.
Yes you are correct I made a mistake here it was rushed.Sorry .See my reply to jae.You claim 'Christianity is following Jesus Christ's lead.' I am having trouble following you here. Jesus taught love of neighbour. What is more he illustrated love of neighbour by the way he lived his life -- humble, forgiving, compassionate, merciful, challenging the system, identifying with the outcast. If people follow his lead wouldn't they also be loving of neighbour?
It isn't Lol. It is the actual belief system that is at fault. if the doctrine actually orders the abhorant behaviour (or at least their interpretation of it), Then the actual doctrine must take part of the blame.Who is claiming that christianity is all pure and lovely? Not me. Christianiy is a belief system. It is made up of imperfect individuals. It is sometimes misunderstood and/or misinterpreted. And people fall short of their ideals. And all too often peeople jump on the bandwagon and use it for their advantage. It is not the fault of the BS when people fail to live up to its ideals or abuse it for their own interests.
No Regardless of him merely being a character in a book. It was poorly worded Jae I should have wrote. "Christianity should after all follow Jesus christ's lead". He is narrating Leviticus 19:9-18 after all. My bad.
Are you seriously telling me that every christian adheres to this.
Leviticus 19:9 And when ye reap the harvest of your land, thou shalt not wholly reap the corners of thy field, neither shalt thou gather the gleanings of thy harvest.
10 And thou shalt not glean thy vineyard, neither shalt thou gather every grape of thy vineyard; thou shalt leave them for the poor and stranger: I am the Lord your God.
11 Ye shall not steal, neither deal falsely, neither lie one to another.
12 And ye shall not swear by my name falsely, neither shalt thou profane the name of thy God: I am the Lord.
13 Thou shalt not defraud thy neighbour, neither rob him: the wages of him that is hired shall not abide with thee all night until the morning.
14 Thou shalt not curse the deaf, nor put a stumblingblock before the blind, but shalt fear thy God: I am the Lord.
15 Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment: thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honor the person of the mighty: but in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbour.
16 Thou shalt not go up and down as a talebearer among thy people: neither shalt thou stand against the blood of thy neighbour; I am the Lord.
17 Thou shalt not hate thy brother in thine heart: thou shalt in any wise rebuke thy neighbour, and not suffer sin upon him.
18 Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself: I am the Lord.
To be clear, you are saying there is a complete lack of any empirical evidence verifying your assertion that "No religious person can love their neighbour. Unless of course the neighbour is of the same church." It is simply a statement of opinion?The complete lack of any.
Pavlos Maros said:And that is exactly what I've been saying. And now. Lol. You are going to envoke the not true
Pavlos Maros said:scotsman fallacy ok.
Pavlos Maros said:Yes you are correct I made a mistake here it was rushed. Sorry. See my reply to jae.
Pavlos Maros said:if the doctrine actually orders the abhorant behaviour (or at least their interpretation of it), Then the actual doctrine must take part of the blame.
which is why Jesus is a Savior because no one can 100% adhere to the law, ever man has issues in his/her heart, but I do find it very funny when atheist take scripture out of context like you just did to justify there position.