TRUMP - Some people think......... How do you feel?

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Register Log in
Jae said:
It's a fair reference chansen, and I'm sure I can't convince you of otherwise. That said, nope, I like Trump because I think he's the right choice for America right now. In addition, as a disciple of Christ, I feel I cannot support Clinton's social positions such as her radical one on abortion.
Click to expand...

Being pro-choice is hardly a radical position, even in the States. One you disagree with, sure, but that hardly makes it radical in this day and age.
 
Mendalla said:
Being pro-choice is hardly a radical position, even in the States. One you disagree with, sure, but that hardly makes it radical in this day and age.
Click to expand...

Okay, but Clinton is in favor of late term abortions. I'd call that stance radical. It's further than many who are pro-choice would take things.( sentence deleted by mod.as it was offensive and unsubstantiated )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Once again, taking extreme junk Christian arguments that even most Christians see through and posting them as your position. Simply because they'll get a big reaction. It's so predictable, it's a yawn-fest.
 
Wrong Jae. Here it is from snopes:

WHAT'S TRUE: Both Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton support abortion access with few restrictions, and Clinton indicated she would agree with late-term abortion bans if provisions were included for the health of the mother.

WHAT'S FALSE: Clinton and Sanders didn't expressly seek to legalize all elective abortions up to 36 weeks, and neither candidate said that fetuses didn't feel pain or have rights.

Can you provide a different reference?
 
chansen said:
Once again, taking extreme junk Christian arguments that even most Christians see through and posting them as your position. Simply because they'll get a big reaction. It's so predictable, it's a yawn-fest.
Click to expand...

That's what your words are when you speak like this chansen. One big snooze. So very tired. Falling asleep as we speak. Zzz.
 
Tabitha said:
Wrong Jae. Here it is from snopes:

WHAT'S TRUE: Both Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton support abortion access with few restrictions, and Clinton indicated she would agree with late-term abortion bans if provisions were included for the health of the mother.

WHAT'S FALSE: Clinton and Sanders didn't expressly seek to legalize all elective abortions up to 36 weeks, and neither candidate said that fetuses didn't feel pain or have rights.

Can you provide a different reference?
Click to expand...

Even going by what you've provided here Tabitha, Clinton is in support of some late-term abortions.
 
So now you'll double down and try to bait me.

The way you regard people as things to manipulate and give you the negative attention you seek, is just wrong. No one need take anything you post seriously.
 
chansen said:
So now you'll double down and try to bait me.

The way you regard people as things to manipulate and give you the negative attention you seek, is just wrong. No one need take anything you post seriously.
Click to expand...

Thanks chansen. I'm in bed now and needed something to fall asleep to.
 
Some Christians (on reality theory) like people to follow them in a mad state ... just look about at the trinity of leadership. There could be exceptions ... those out of it (that which is in vogue) ... outlandish con scripts!

If you have no follows ... perhaps they have you on ignore or delete ... a metaphor for denial! Yah yah g'URLS (darker shades)where everything we know is subconsciously stored ... part of the syndrome of Haggadai ... or Stockholm ... where 'f you wish to keep them home ... have a good myth to captivate their imagination ... it is the most important part ... it passes over lightly in some hard cases who refuse to be cognizant of alien things ... like unseen gods ... kind of behaves like opinionated and emotional and not much under the v' near estas a brain fold ... where breezes of mind work out ... Nous Masses? LG King would say pneuma ... similar to an old cougar in drag ... respect the grand mother and all her précis dents ... you have subconsciously absorbed many of those knocks ... I.E. the stuff you arn't consciously receptive to ... like the pain of learning?
 
Kimmio said:
Can a president be impeached before they are sworn in?
Click to expand...

Ja eZus can they be impeached as being sworn at as a determinate NOSH ... bitter and can't change their hunger for power even though not that cognizant of the indeterminates in reality that depend upon conscience?

Some don't got nun (haggai woman, or haggadai, gay Skye character, once known as Isis .. chi altered too) and thus cogito erg-0's AUM ... that echo where there is no ego (awareness) whatsoever ... psychologists will get it ... those scholars that do etudes on that which isn't ... the realm of the incarnate ... all in your mind ... under that ... boones of the story forming a skeleton needing meat ... sometimes they are visualised there ... in the SOL as chit out of luck!

If you pull out of it ... you hear echos from all sides ... beautiful whispers in the pine NG! Freely ungoverned albeit only in thought ... and free thought is restricted here ... as press, speech, movement, etc. thus constant patience is required for the shut out experience ... but you do pick up a lot by listening to the silence of what's writ ... the alien script? Some is deep and dark others not so well .. you know shallow, but believe not! Thus ID isn't as it appears, or manifests itself in reality when it isn't ... thus defined QED! (short form of cogito ergo sum, therefore continued because of what isn't know yet-ah ... drop out theory on the philosophy of mind, soul, or psyche ... where wisdom went and become passive ... thus reclusive and po' lyre cognizant than some could believe ... so they don't, or Eire'NT! Lack of virtue ... virtual reality as it pops up ...
 
I really really hate the discussion of late term abortions

It is such a crap discussion. Full of statements that have no basis in reality

Doctors do not do late term abortions unless the mothers life is at risk. Why would her life be at risk?

Partial placental abruption perhaps.

Fetal death of unknown cause that has not resulted in a miscarriage. Now the mother is carrying a rotting corpse inside her that is causing the mother to begin to have clotting issues

These types if things result in late abortions
 
The concept of freedom in the west is a clot to my observations ... causing obscurity ... thus the need for staring about ... alien Leers?

Do abortions bother the mother lode? Some prophylactic may assist but religiously contended by those that love infinite growth in the market place. Could this cause a bust ... or just collapse of an uninformed host?

When is enough ... enough ... that is a question of people that can't see consequence or reason with results ... a distant hope, dream or just fear of getting out of here ... thus Isis ... Skye Gods? Kind've out of here ...
 
Kimmio said:
Can a president be impeached before they are sworn in?
Click to expand...
nope. because AFAIK impeachment applies to crimes committed while in office.

ANd as I understand it, in the full process to impeach a President the House votes to indict. Then the Senate serves as the trial. Can't remember if the Senate needs a 2/3 vote or a simple majority to convict. IIRC Bill was indicted by the House but not convicted by the Senate (and really the serious crime for which he was indicted was perjury, not adultery or sexual misconduct)
 
If Hillary voters stay home, like they did for her rallies, she is not going to win.

Even if Trump loses, something more remarkable than99%ers sitting around in parks has begun. The corruption goes right to the top. There is plenty of stuff out there to put most of them in jail, but it won't happen because those who could throw them in jail are on the take too.

Wiki leaks has proven a lot and gotten quite a few dems fired already. Others are getting immunity deals. What if disgruntled office staff for all the corrupt politicians start sending in emails?

In four more years we could see a whole new set of faces.

Many in both the left and the right, I think have put their finger on the problem and wiki leaks is the tool to throw light on it. Too bad for Kimmio that Sanders caved. But as usual it's the other guys who get things done.
 
Pontifex Geronimo 13 said:
One of the last wiki leaks emails shows huffington post working for Hillary too.
Click to expand...
It's no secret that Huffpost generally appeals to readers on "the left" and pieces about Trump have a permanent footnote at the bottom that says something like, "Donald Trump is misongynistic, xenophobic, sexist, racist..." Etc. - and that has been the case, openly, for about a year. They make no bones about not supporting Trump. And that is based on comments he has actually made about women and minorities, and people like the KKK who support him. That "opinion" is completely based on his own words, recorded - which he calls unfair or denies after saying them on national TV.

Fox is working for Trump. Roger Ailes was hired to be on his team. Hannity works for Trump...where's wikileaks on Trump's media influences? Where is wikileaks on wikileaks conflict of interest/ interference? Who gets to oversee them on what they choose to publish, as though it isn't biased? Wikileaks used to be non-partisan. Why have they not put out much controversial stuff about Trump but have made a carnival out of timing their releases of anything that could be hinted at as controversial about Hillary?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top