Was Adam part of the creation process?

[Jaebius]

Didn't you have a different name or avatar before Wondercafe2?

Cheers

Yes, I went through a number of names on WC.

 

[Bolt_upright]

Yes, I went through a number of names on WC.

I went through a phase where I denied my identity. It is good to deny one's "flesh" or "self" but to deny one's name, there are things to consider. What name is written in the lambs book of life is an important one. Perhaps we will get a new name after Yeshua returns.
The fields are so ripe right now. I'm sure many believers can feel it.

 

[Jaebius]

I went through a phase where I denied my identity. It is good to deny one's "flesh" or "self" but to deny one's name, there are things to consider. What name is written in the lambs book of life is an important one. Perhaps we will get a new name after Yeshua returns.
The fields are so ripe right now. I'm sure many believers can feel it.

I am hoping for the new name of Redondo Nunepeko, but we shall see.

 

[revjohn]

Wow John" if we are going to keep this up. we should really have our own

thread .

Not too late to ask Mendalla to pull posts and move them to another thread. If you wish I can work with Mendalla to pull appropriate posts between us onto a new thread where we can continue.

Airclean---- I am not here to hurt anyone.

Which is great intention provided it doesn't wind up paving roads to hell right?

By the way have you read Neo's latest post? You might find it interesting on a number of levels.

But if you want to attack me" . I will defend.

And when you attack others who gets to defend them?

At any rate, in light of Neo's post you would be best served by comparing your actions with your intentions. There appears to be a disconnect.

In a response to revsdd you blame it on your old self. That being the case your new self has an opportunity to do something about it. I expect many will be watching to see what the difference is between your new self and your old self.

Time to step up.

And to be clear. I really hope you can. You alone, at this moment, have the ability to demonstrate the quality of your character like never before.

I hope you can figure it out.

 

[Bolt_upright]

Would it be mind blowing if an ancient body or preserved mummy dated 3000 years old found to have the same DNA as someone today???

What a story that would be, eh?

 

[Jaebius]

Would it be mind blowing if an ancient body or preserved mummy dated 3000 years old found to have the same DNA as someone today???

What a story that would be, eh?

I feel that would be odd since I believe that adaptation has occurred since the time of the Creation.

 

[Bolt_upright]

I feel that would be odd since I believe that adaptation has occurred since the time of the Creation.

I'm not sure I know know what you mean by that.

 

[Kimmio Laughterlove]

Would it be mind blowing if an ancient body or preserved mummy dated 3000 years old found to have the same DNA as someone today???

What a story that would be, eh?

Mummy DNA shows that the ancients don’t have much in common with modern Egyptians

 

[Luce NDs]

I feel that would be odd since I believe that adaptation has occurred since the time of the Creation.

Some people will adapt to anything of folly that lies there unquestioned ... like those humanoid footprints from 5.6 million year old stones ... even institutionalized scientists can't get there head around that and act religiously as if something is in denial ...

The old scripts do say to question everything ... nothing excluded as nothing is not recognizable ... sort of a catharsis ... deluge or wash? Cat's R's I say ... I've experienced them ... a Jae is like one ... illusive about what hei sup tue ... with More Leigh/league under the water ...

 

[Mendalla]

Mummy DNA shows that the ancients don’t have much in common with modern Egyptians

Which isn't much of a shock given how many times that region was invaded and received new populations over the centuries since that mummy died.

Would it be mind blowing if an ancient body or preserved mummy dated 3000 years old found to have the same DNA as someone today???

What a story that would be, eh?

Impossible. The only human beings with identical DNA are twins (or clones, but we aren't there, yet). They could have the same genetic markers showing they are part of the same population, but not the exact same DNA.

And even that makes no sense genetically, because human populations have shifted and mixed so much, even within historic times, that few people alive today would have identical markers to their own ancestors. And with globalization allowing even more mixing of different gene pools, that will only get more complex. Consider my son who has DNA from European ancestors on my side and Chinese ancestors on his mother's, then consider the mixing and matching that happened in both those regions over the millenia.

 

[Kimmio Laughterlove]

I was just thinking..."well, we all share human DNA."

 

[Luce NDs]

I was just thinking..."well, we all share human DNA."

Also consider the similarities in animal and DNA inhuman form ... some more inhuman than others as they love bum drops ...

In Dixie ... the agent was tar ... then the feathering .. a sick joke for those down south in the heat? Tis a good binding agent ... even seals roofers ...

 

[Mendalla]

I was just thinking..."well, we all share human DNA."

Except human DNA covers a lot of ground. For instance, we European-descended folks are more likely to have traces of Neanderthal DNA while Asians, like Jae's and my wives, may have traces of Denisovan DNA (an extinct human species known only from a few bones and only known to be a separate species because we sequenced their DNA). We are all technically the same species, but the variety and diversity among humans is quite amazing. I believe there's even some evidence of a third non-sapiens human species interbreeding with us but I forget the details. Something like a marker a few humans carry that doesn't fit any known species.

 

[Luce NDs]

Except human DNA covers a lot of ground. For instance, we European-descended folks are more likely to have traces of Neanderthal DNA while Asians, like Jae's and my wives, may have traces of Denisovan DNA (an extinct human species known only from a few bones and only known to be a separate species because we sequenced their DNA). We are all technically the same species, but the variety and diversity among humans is quite amazing. I believe there's even some evidence of a third non-sapiens human species interbreeding with us but I forget the details. Something like a marker a few humans carry that doesn't fit any known species.

God is said to like variety ... and thus the tremendous scattering ... thoughts get drawn into the draught ...

 

[Kimmio Laughterlove]

Except human DNA covers a lot of ground. For instance, we European-descended folks are more likely to have traces of Neanderthal DNA while Asians, like Jae's and my wives, may have traces of Denisovan DNA (an extinct human species known only from a few bones and only known to be a separate species because we sequenced their DNA). We are all technically the same species, but the variety and diversity among humans is quite amazing. I believe there's even some evidence of a third non-sapiens human species interbreeding with us but I forget the details. Something like a marker a few humans carry that doesn't fit any known species.

But can't human origins all be traced back to Africa?

 

[Mendalla]

But can't human origins all be traced back to Africa?

Ultimately, but it is still not entirely clear when we left, if we even all left at once, and what happened to who when during the millenia when we were spreading throughout the world. The fact remains that while my DNA and my wife's are the same basic set of chromosomes, there are some significant differences between us in the details of what is encoded in those chromosomes. Little M will be different again since he is a mashup of both.

 

[BetteTheRed]

And I'm betting that Little M will be a stronger human, immunologically anyway, than either you or your Mrs. Mixed breed animals are almost always substantially stronger and longer lived than their purebred counterparts. Life thrives in diversity.

 

[Kimmio Laughterlove]

It's true...but I'd add that I think humans are more than just animals. At the very least we have higher creative capacity than the rest of the animals. It's a pet peeve, to hear of humans spoken of in terms of breeding stock.

 

[chansen]

But that's what we are. It doesn't matter what you want.

 

[Kimmio Laughterlove]

But that's what we are. It doesn't matter what you want.

Not only me, of course. There are some socially problematic issues in viewing humans as breeding stock. History proves this (uh eugenics - starts with the idea that people are superior/ inferior stock - doesn't matter to whom it's applied, it's still callous). That we can recognize and analyze our history means we are not just breeding stock, anyway.