Pavlos Maros
Well-Known Member
Imagine a world where God announces that "Hell" has been permanently closed, and that everyone, regardless of their actions or beliefs, will go to heaven. This proclamation raises a fundamental question: without the threat of punishment, would people still worship God?
Would you?
I know for many believers, worship is not merely a transaction to avoid hell, but an expression of love, gratitude, and reverence for the divine. Faith is often driven by a personal relationship with God, where worship serves as a means of connection and spiritual fulfillment. For these individuals, the closure of hell might not diminish their devotion, as their worship is rooted in something deeper than the fear of punishment.
However, the concept of hell has historically served as a moral compass, deterring individuals from immoral actions and reinforcing societal norms. The absence of hell could lead some to question the necessity of adhering to moral or religious laws, potentially weakening the motivation to act ethically.
Human nature often gravitates toward self-interest, and without consequences, some might feel less compelled to uphold justice and morality.
Could this be you?
A friend once said to me If it wasn't for his fear of god, he could kills someone. I replied "I have no fear of a god and I could not kill any one."
The statement that "when justice breaks down so do the populace" reflects a concern that the removal of divine punishment could lead to social disorder.
Being a humanist, (but to the theist, technically an atheist.) I know that nothing would change for me. Mainly because the best places to live have the least amount of religious adherents or there isn't a theocracy ruling them. They are ruled by a secular government. A god and it's morality doesn't come into question.
Would you?
I know for many believers, worship is not merely a transaction to avoid hell, but an expression of love, gratitude, and reverence for the divine. Faith is often driven by a personal relationship with God, where worship serves as a means of connection and spiritual fulfillment. For these individuals, the closure of hell might not diminish their devotion, as their worship is rooted in something deeper than the fear of punishment.
However, the concept of hell has historically served as a moral compass, deterring individuals from immoral actions and reinforcing societal norms. The absence of hell could lead some to question the necessity of adhering to moral or religious laws, potentially weakening the motivation to act ethically.
Human nature often gravitates toward self-interest, and without consequences, some might feel less compelled to uphold justice and morality.
Could this be you?
A friend once said to me If it wasn't for his fear of god, he could kills someone. I replied "I have no fear of a god and I could not kill any one."
The statement that "when justice breaks down so do the populace" reflects a concern that the removal of divine punishment could lead to social disorder.
Being a humanist, (but to the theist, technically an atheist.) I know that nothing would change for me. Mainly because the best places to live have the least amount of religious adherents or there isn't a theocracy ruling them. They are ruled by a secular government. A god and it's morality doesn't come into question.