Am I Now Being As So Atheist ?

Welcome to Wondercafe2!

A community where we discuss, share, and have some fun together. Join today and become a part of it!

Register Log in
Yet killing a knowledge of truth is advantageous to the Gods that take advantage of the sheep, goads and other creatures baffled into the state of naivete!

Once complete new wars can be advanced to improve the wealth of what the others did lose --- Lucely stated by Lucy in red fabric! In some myths she plays the part of a neuroscientist ... painful in her supporting of kicks! This may appear as the dance ,,, fundamentally! What funds mentally deprived folks? Lures of power!

In the swamp of humanity this is all denied and put down ... due to denial of neural 'đ issue. There are impacts and implications with the mysterious machinations of life ... thus stories as pure intellect cannot be accepted without some experience of whats out there in the great circle! There are plastic cores ... thermal SET ... hard types that don't flow well and await further functions, operations and Jobs on them ... the whole lot ...

Occiput ... that fat that just doesn't cut it in the west!
 
I am quite interested in the persons who refuse my point of view. I am curious about this refusal coming from theists as well as atheists. It pleases me to realize my standing beyond conventional thinking regarding matters of human concern.

Moses wanted to know the name of God. That name is “I am who I am”. My own true name is “I am who I am becoming”.
 
Do you find a difference between using non-theist verus a-theist as a label, although they essentially mean the same thing?
 
BetteTheRed said:
Do you find a difference between using non-theist verus a-theist as a label, although they essentially mean the same thing?
Click to expand...

I am now 'bethinking' and no longer habitually 'believing'.

Belief is acquired through culture and education - therefore 'make belief'.

I chose Atheist ... in favor of the good ole 'default' position:

'It is not ultimately up to the atheist to justify atheism; rather, it is up to the theist to explain why belief in any god is reasonable.'

In the absence of such an explanation ... I Am Free To Be As Is Being.
 
GeoFee said:
That name is “I am who I am”. My own true name is “I am who I am becoming”.
Click to expand...

Not quite true, you're small I am cannot become other than what it currently is without the will of the Great I AM's objective help.

You do not possess the power to become other than what you are
 
Last edited:
My current nature finds itself in the unchanging nature of my freedom to choose how I react to my circumstances be they mere or dire.
 
Ritafee said:
My current nature finds itself in the unchanging nature of my freedom to choose how I react to my circumstances be they mere or dire.
Click to expand...
Exactly , which is why I said " I am that I am becoming is not true , no one has the power to become other than what they currently are.
 
Amore true translation would read

I will be that I will to be

Their is so much power in that name alone than most people even realize
 
blackbelt1961 said:
Amore true translation would read

I will be that I will to be

Their is so much power in that name alone than most people even realize
Click to expand...
So, wouldn't a slight paraphrase of that be, 'I will be what I want to become'?
 
Ritafee said:
I am now 'bethinking' and no longer habitually 'believing'.

Belief is acquired through culture and education - therefore 'make belief'.

I chose Atheist ... in favor of the good ole 'default' position:

'It is not ultimately up to the atheist to justify atheism; rather, it is up to the theist to explain why belief in any god is reasonable.'

In the absence of such an explanation ... I Am Free To Be As Is Being.
Click to expand...

As a latent child and even before I was told by religious types that I shouldn't bethinking! Glad I turned that over with a hoe'd metaphor!

Perhaps a bit hoer frosty?
 
blackbelt1961 said:
not true ,
That power does not change the nature of what you currently are but merely your circumstances your current nature finds itself in
Click to expand...

See the great fuzzy Black Belt is blinding you psyche because of the bethinking theory was discarded, denied and exorcised by choice on that side ... thus nothing comes together for that spot ... Moor words to be absorbed from the spread've green? So hung in space ...
 
Redbaron said:
So, wouldn't a slight paraphrase of that be, 'I will be what I want to become'?
Click to expand...

There are those that don;t wish that ... could involve change in the institution that constituted them to SET thought ... the sanman will wear that down ... given times and climate alterations .... storming normals? I see images of blown leaders in a comedown state! Thus spirits descent ... the lighter ones casting shadows ...

Institutional minds as edifices can't get the*ir head about it ... soft, gentile, dark domains ... like inside a clam ... metaphorically there appears a story is in their!
 
I think maybe Blackbelt is trying to say that we can only "become" within the limitations of being a human being, where as God can "become" anything (shape shifter) and beyond the capabilities of everything?
 
Waterfall said:
I think maybe Blackbelt is trying to say that we can only "become" within the limitations of being a human being, where as God can "become" anything (shape shifter) and beyond the capabilities of everything?
Click to expand...

Then one throws nothing into the fray ... causing a hole Heh place ... consequences vary greatly as broad spread ... Sp. literary capability that leaves the alternate speechless ...
 
blackbelt1961 said:
Not quite true, you're small I am cannot become other than what it currently is without the will of the Great I AM's objective help.

You do not possess the power to become other than what you are
Click to expand...
The word “objective” is not how I understand my standing in the presence of God. My relationship is wholly subjective. I am related to God revealed in the presence of Jesus, a human being just like me. This is a person to person relationship (subjective) and not a person to fact (objective) relationship. I do not follow any doctrine or dogma related to God. Nor to I profess my relationship with God as the only possible way to know God.

Jesus calls persons to be followers. This involves counting the cost and taking up responsibility. Following being the way of sanctification by which all that comes between me and God is stripped away. You may not agree and that is fine with me. I do not need your agreement to move forward confidently in life. Nor am I intimidated or coerced by the fear of death.

I am who I am becoming. My position is the same as the apostle who was inspired by the spirit to say:
​
“All athletes are disciplined in their training. They do it to win a prize that will fade away, but we do it for an eternal prize. So I run with purpose in every step. I am not just shadowboxing. I discipline my body like an athlete, training it to do what it should.”​
​
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top